Do patients benefit from tourniquet in arthroscopic surgeries of the knee?
- 471 Downloads
To undertake a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether routine use of a tourniquet is a better choice for knee arthroscopic procedures.
Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the application of a tourniquet were selected, gathering information about arthroscopic visualization and operative time. The random-effects meta-analysis was performed using relative risk calculated from the raw data.
A total of five eligible studies were selected in this meta-analysis with 471 participants. There was no significant difference in visualization or operative time between the tourniquet and the non-tourniquet group.
There is insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that patients would benefit from routinely applying a tourniquet. The use of a tourniquet did not show any advantage to arthroscopic procedures.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic randomized controlled trials, Level I.
KeywordsTourniquet Knee arthroscopy Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trials
- 14.Julian PT, Sally G (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. http://www.cochrane.org/training/cochrane-handbook
- 17.Klenerman L (1962) The tourniquet in surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br 44:937–943Google Scholar
- 23.Patterson S, Klenerman L (1979) The effect of the pneumatic tourniquet on the ultrastructure of skeletal muscle. J Bone Jt Surg Br 61:178–183Google Scholar
- 26.Shaw JA, Murray DG (1982) The relationship between tourniquet pressure and underlying soft-tissue pressure in the thigh. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64(8):1148–1152Google Scholar
- 27.Sherman OH, Fox JM, Snyder SJ et al (1986) Arthroscopy- “No problem surgery”. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:256–265Google Scholar
- 33.Tountas CP, Bergman RA (1977) Tourniquet ischemia: ultrastructural and histochemical observations of ischemic human muscle and of monkey muscle and nerve. J Hand Surg [Am] 2:31–37Google Scholar