Comparison between Nintendo Wii Fit and conventional rehabilitation on functional performance outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was to compare the outcomes, including knee strength, balance, coordination, proprioception and response time, of Nintendo Wii Fit with those of conventional rehabilitation on the subjects with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Thirty volunteer subjects were enrolled in either Wii Fit (n = 15; mean age, 29 ± 7 years) or conventional rehabilitation (n = 15; mean age, 29 ± 6 years) programmes from the first week up to 12th weeks of the operation. Endoscopic reconstruction of a completely ruptured ACL was performed by using graft harvested from hamstrings. Each subject underwent an individual therapeutic programme. Functional examinations included the measurements of the balance using modified star excursion balance test, coordination, proprioception and response time using functional squat system and strength of flexor and extensor muscles of the involved and uninvolved leg using an isokinetic machine.
There was no significant difference between Wii Fit and conventional group in terms of isokinetic knee strength at 12th week, and dynamic balance, and functional squat tests including coordination, proprioception and response time at first, 8th and 12th weeks of the rehabilitation.
Two different 12-week-physiotherapy programmes following ACL reconstruction have the same affect on muscle strength, dynamic balance and functional performance values in both groups. We considered that the practice of Wii Fit activities like conventional rehabilitation could also address physical therapy goals, which included improving visual–perceptual processing, coordination, proprioception and functional mobility.
Level of evidence
Randomized, controlled trials with adequate statistical power, Level I.
KeywordsStrength Balance Proprioception Coordination ACL Rehabilitation
- 3.Bjorklund K, Skold C, Andersson L, Dalen N (2006) Reliability of a criterion-based test of athletes with knee injuries; where the physiotherapist and the patient independently and simultaneously assess the patient’s performance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:165–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Decoster L, Labore, LL, Boquiren, ML, Russell, PJ (2008) Monitored rehab functional squat coordination test: reliability, learning curve and eccentric-concentric performance comparisons. http://www.nhmi.net/monitored_rehab_functional_squat_coordination_test.php
- 13.Hertel J, Miller S, Denegar C (2000) Intratester and intertester reliability during the star excursion balance test. J Sport Rehabil 9:104–116Google Scholar
- 14.Jamshidi AA, Olyaei GR, Heydarian K, Talebian S (2005) Isokinetic and functional parameters in patients following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Isokinet Exerc Sci 13:267–272Google Scholar
- 16.Kinzey SJ, Armstrong CW (1998) The reliability of the star excursion balance test in assessing dynamic balance. J Orthop Sports Phys The 27:356–360Google Scholar
- 18.Lautamies R, Harilainen A, Kettunen J, Sandelin J, Kujala UM (2008) Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1009–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M (2011) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD008349Google Scholar
- 23.Monitored Rehab Systems Software-MRS-E0701 Guidelines (2006) pp 74–97Google Scholar
- 25.Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Underwood FB, Elkins B et al (2009) The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. Am J Sports Phys Ther 4(2):92–99Google Scholar