Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 1516–1522 | Cite as

Prospective comparative study between two different fixation techniques in meniscal allograft transplantation

  • Ferran Abat
  • Pablo Eduardo GelberEmail author
  • Juan I. Erquicia
  • Marc Tey
  • Gemma Gonzalez-Lucena
  • Juan Carlos Monllau
Knee
First Online:

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the functional and radiographic results between two different horn fixation techniques for meniscal allograft transplant.

Methods

This is a prospective study of 88 meniscal allograft transplants with a mean 5-year follow-up. Forty transplants were performed on the medial compartment and 48 on the lateral compartment. The same surgeon performed all surgeries. Thirty-three grafts were fixed only with sutures (Group A) and 55 only with bony fixation (Group B). Both groups were comparable in terms of age, laterality, time since meniscectomy and preoperative functional and radiographic status. Functional assessment was done with Lysholm and Tegner scores and the Visual Analogical Scale for pain. Joint space narrowing was evaluated in the Rosenberg view.

Results

There was a significant improvement in Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores without differences between Group A and Group B (n.s.). Radiographic evaluation did not show any joint space narrowing (n.s.). No differences in the comparison of all the variables of the two compartments were found. There were complications in 33.3 % of patients in Group A that including 7 graft tears (21.4 %) and in which there was an allograft failure rate of 9 %. Group B showed complications in 16.4 % of the patients and included 4 graft tears (7.3 %, n.s.) with an allograft failure rate of 3.6 %.

Conclusions

Meniscal allograft transplantation with either technique provided good functional and radiographic results at mid-term follow-up. Both graft fixation methods showed no differences relative to functional and radiographic results. There was a considerably higher rate of complications in transplantations performed with the only-suture technique than those with bony fixation, although the difference was not statistically significant with the numbers available. The results suggest that similar functional results should be expected whether the meniscal graft includes bone plugs or not. However, graft tears seem to happen more frequently if the MAT is performed without bony fixation.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Keywords

Meniscectomy Meniscal transplantation Meniscal allograft Suture fixation Bony fixation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ignasi Gich for assisting in the statistical analysis. We also thank Eric Goode for his help in correcting the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Alentorn-Geli E, Seijas Vázquez R, García Balletbó M, Alvarez Díaz P, Steinbacher G, Cuscó Segarra X, Rius Vilarrubia M, Cugat Bertomeu R (2011) Arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation without bone plugs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alhalki MM, Howell SM, Hull ML (1999) How three methods for fixing a medial meniscal autograft affect tibial contact mechanics. Am J Sports Med 27:320–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen CR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, Sakane M, Fu FH, Woo SL (2000) Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 18:109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bae JH, Lim HC, Kim HJ, Kim TS, Yang JH, Yoon JR (2010) Arthroscopic treatment of acute septic arthritis after meniscal allograft transplantation. Orthopedics 33. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-24
  5. 5.
    Buckland-Wright JC (1999) Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: comparison between existing methodologies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:430–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen MI, Branch TP, Hutton WC (1996) Is it important to secure the horns during lateral meniscal transplantation? A cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 12:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elattar M, Dhollander A, Verdonk R, Almqvist KF, Verdonk P (2011) Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:147–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott DM, Jones R, Setton LA, Scully SP, Vail TP, Guilak F (2002) Joint degeneration following meniscal allograft transplantation in a canine model: mechanical properties and semiquantitative histology of articular cartilage. Knee Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30B:664–670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gelber PE, Gonzalez G, Lloreta JL, Reina F, Caceres E, Monllau JC (2008) Freezing causes changes in the meniscus collagen net: a new ultrastructural meniscus disarray scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:353–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    González-Lucena G, Gelber PE, Pelfort X, Tey M, Monllau JC (2010) Meniscal allograft transplantation without bone blocks: a 5- to 8-year follow-up of 33 patients. Arthroscopy 26:1633–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ha JK, Sung JH, Shim JC, Seo JG, Kim JG (2011) Medial meniscus allograft transplantation using a modified bone plug technique: clinical, radiologic, and arthroscopic results. Arthroscopy 27:944–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hale CA, Fleiss JL (1993) Interval estimation under two study designs for kappa with binary classifications. Biometrics 49:523–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hergan D, Thut D, Sherman O, Day MS, Phil M (2011) Meniscal allograft transplantation. Arthroscopy 27:101–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hommen JP, Applegate GR, Del Pizzo W (2007) Meniscus allograft transplantation: ten-year results of cryopreserved allografts. Arthroscopy 23:388–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunt S, Kaplan K, Ishak C, Kummer FJ, Meislin E (2008) Bone plug versus suture fixation of the posterior horn in medial meniscal allograft transplantation: a biomechanical study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66:22–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jung YH, Choi NH, Victoroff BN (2011) Arthroscopic stabilization of the lateral capsule of the knee in meniscal transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:189–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LaPrade RF, Wills NJ, Spiridonov SI, Perkinson S (2010) A prospective outcomes study of meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 38:1804–1812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lubowitz JH, Verdonk PC, Reid JB 3rd, Verdonk R (2007) Meniscus allograft transplantation: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:476–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Bonanzinga T, Nitri M, Bondi A, Molinari M, Rimondi E (2012) Meniscal allograft transplantation without bone plugs: a 3-year minimum follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 40:395–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matava MJ (2007) Meniscal allograft transplantation: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:142–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDermott ID, Lie DT, Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2008) The effects of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation techniques on tibio-femoral contact pressures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:553–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milachowski KA, Weismeier K, Wirth CJ (1989) Homologous meniscus transplantation. Experimental and clinical results. Int Orthop 13:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Rankin M (2005) Meniscal transplantation in symptomatic patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 1):149–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pollard ME, Kang Q, Berg EE (1995) Radiographic sizing for meniscal transplantation. Arthroscopy 11:684–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rijk PC, Van Noorden CJF (2002) Structural analysis of meniscal allografts after immediate and delayed transplantation in rabbits. Arthroscopy 18:995–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sekiya JK, Giffin JR, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2003) Clinical outcomes after combined meniscal allograft transplantation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:896–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spang JT, Dang AB, Mazzocca A, Rincon L, Obopilwe E, Beynnon B, Arciero RA (2010) The effect of medial meniscectomy and meniscal allograft transplantation on knee and anterior cruciate ligament biomechanics. Arthroscopy 26:192–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stollsteimer GT, Shelton WR, Dukes A, Bomboy AL (2000) Meniscal allograft transplantation: a 1- to 5-year follow-up of 22 patients. Arthroscopy 16:343–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Szomor ZL, Martin TE, Bonar F, Murrell GA (2000) The protective effects of meniscal transplantation on cartilage. An experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:80–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tengrootenhuysen M, Meermans G, Pittoors K, van Riet R, Victor J (2011) Long-term outcome after meniscal repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:236–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Arkel ER, de Boer HH (2002) Survival analysis of human meniscal transplantations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:227–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van der Wal RJ, Thomassen BJ, van Arkel ER (2009) Long-term clinical outcome of open meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 37:2134–2139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Verdonk PC, Demurie A, Almqvist KF, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R (2005) Transplantation of viable meniscal allograft. Survivorship analysis and clinical outcome of one hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:715–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Verdonk PC, Verstraete KL, Almqvist KF, De Cuyper K, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R (2006) Meniscal allograft transplantation: long-term clinical results with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging correlations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:694–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vundelinckx B, Bellemans J, Vanlauwe J (2010) Arthroscopically assisted meniscal allograft transplantation in the knee: a medium-term subjective, clinical, and radiographical outcome evaluation. Am J Sport Med 38:2240–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wirth CJ, von Lewinski G (2004) Long-term results after combined medial meniscal allograft transplantation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 8.5-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 20:782–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yoldas EA, Sekiya JK, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2003) Arthroscopically assisted meniscal allograft transplantation with and without combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:173–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yoon JR, Kim TS, Lee YM, Jang HW, Kim YC, Yang JH (2011) Transpatellar approach in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation using the keyhole method: can we prevent graft extrusion? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:214–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang H, Liu X, Wei Y, Hong L, Geng XS, Wang XS, Zhang J, Cheng KB, Feng H (2012) Meniscal allograft transplantation in isolated and combined surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ferran Abat
    • 1
  • Pablo Eduardo Gelber
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Juan I. Erquicia
    • 2
  • Marc Tey
    • 2
  • Gemma Gonzalez-Lucena
    • 1
  • Juan Carlos Monllau
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.ICATME-Institut Universitari DexeusUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options