Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction
- 556 Downloads
In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with looped soft-tissue grafts, an interference screw is frequently used for tibial fixation. This study compared three alternatives thought to improve the initial mechanical properties of direct bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: suturing the graft to close the loop, adding a supplementary staple, or increasing the oversize of the screw diameter relative to the bone tunnel from 1 to 2 mm.
Twenty-eight porcine tibiae and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized into four testing groups: a base fixation using 10-mm-diameter screw with open-looped graft, base fixation supplemented by an extracortical staple, base fixation but closing the looped graft by suturing its ends, and base fixation but using an 11-mm screw. Graft and bone tunnel diameters were 9 mm in all specimens. Constructs were subjected to cyclic tensile load and finally pulled to failure to determine their structural properties.
The main mode of failure in all groups was pull-out of tendon strands after slippage past the screw. The sutured graft group displayed significantly lower residual displacement (mean value reduction: 47–67 %) and higher yield load (mean value increase: 38–54 %) than any alternative tested. No other statistical differences were found.
Suturing a soft-tissue graft to form a closed loop enhanced the initial mechanical properties of tibial fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using a porcine model, and thus, this may be an efficient means to help in reducing post-operative laxity and early clinical failure. No mechanical improvement was observed for an open-looped tendon graft by adding an extracortical staple to supplement the screw fixation or by increasing the oversize of the screw to tunnel diameter from 1 to 2 mm.
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament Soft-tissue graft Interference screw Tibial fixation Supplementary fixation Mechanical testing
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Chang HC, Nyland J, Nawab A, Burden R, Caborn DN (2005) Biomechanical comparison of the bioabsorbable RetroScrew system, BioScrew XtraLok with stress equalization tensioner, and 35-mm Delta Screws for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation in porcine tibiae. Am J Sports Med 33:1057–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Charlick DA, Caborn DN (2000) Alternative soft tissue graft preparation technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 6:E20Google Scholar
- 7.Espejo-Baena A, Ezquerro F, Pérez de la Blanca A, Serrano-Fernández J, Nadal F, Montañez-Heredia E (2006) Comparison of initial mechanical properties of 4 hamstring graft femoral fixation systems using nonpermanent hardware for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro animal study. Arthroscopy 22:433–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Halewood C, Hirschmann MT, Newman S, Hleihil J, Chaimski G, Amis AA (2011) The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:559–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Scheffler S, Sudkamp N, Gockenjan A, Hoffmann R, Weiler A (2002) Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: the impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 18:304–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Walsh MP, Wijdicks CA, Armitage BM, Westerhaus BD, Parker JB, Laprade RF (2009) The 1:1 versus the 2:2 tunnel-drilling technique: optimization of fixation strength and stiffness in an all-inside double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 37:1539–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Wijdicks CA, Brand EJ, Nuckley DJ, Johansen S, LaPrade RF, Engebretsen L (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of a medial knee reconstruction with comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw constructs and optimization with a cortical button. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1532–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Zantop T, Weimann A, Schmidtko R, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Petersen W (2006) Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro study comparing titanium, poly-d, l-lactide, and poly-d, l-lactide-tricalcium phosphate screws. Arthroscopy 22:1204–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar