Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 2559–2566 | Cite as

Superiority of bridging techniques with medial fixation on initial strength

  • Werner AnderlEmail author
  • Philipp R. Heuberer
  • Brenda Laky
  • Bernhard Kriegleder
  • Roland Reihsner
  • Josef Eberhardsteiner



The purpose of our study was to evaluate the initial fixation strength of bridging techniques compared to other suture techniques for rotator cuff repair using a biomechanical animal model, which incorporated pretesting of intact tendons.


Seventy-six fresh bovine shoulders were used for testing seven suture configurations including simple suture (SS), mattress suture (MS), Mason-Allen (MA), modified double row (mDR), SpeedBridge (SpB), SpeedBridge with medial fixation (mSpB), and double-mattress SutureBridge (dmSuB) techniques. Cyclic loading was performed with all intact bone-tendon complex before (pretest) and after repair of the tendon (main test) at the level of 10 and 180 N at 100 Hz with displacement-controlled ramps of ±33 mm/s. The pretest was stopped after 200 cycles. For the main test, the loading scheme was continued for a maximum of 500 cycles or until failure.


The mean elongation of all 76 intact tendons measured at the pretest was 3.8 ± 0.6 mm (2.4–5.4 mm). No differences of gap formations at the 1st cycle were detected between SS, MS, MA, and mDR. SpB showed significant higher gap formations compared to all other suture techniques (p = 0.001). No significant differences were detected between mSpB and dmSuB, whereas both techniques were significant different when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).


In this study, results showed that bridging techniques with medial fixations have superior initial repair strength compared to other suture techniques. Knowledge of initial fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques may be of informative value to the surgeon.


Biomechanical testing Initial fixation strength Rotator cuff repair Single row, double row Bridging techniques 


  1. 1.
    Anderl W, Reihsner R, Heuberer P, Kriegleder B, Eberhardsteiner J (2011) Comparison of the stability of different arthroscopic tendon fixation techniques in dynamic tests. Strain 47:421–429Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo I, Bird J, Gladstone J, Flatow E (2006) Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Should Elbow Surg 15(3):290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhart SS, Adams CR, Schoolfield JD (2009) A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy 25(3):274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhart SS, Diaz Pagan JL, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA (1997) Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 13(6):720–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkhart SS, Johnson TC, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA (1997) Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure. Arthroscopy 13(2):172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busfield BT, Glousman RE, McGarry MH, Tibone JE, Lee TQ (2008) A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical variations of double-row rotator cuff fixation: the importance of medial row knots. Am J Sports Med 36(5):901–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D (2007) Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: a prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1247–1253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christoforetti JJ, Krupp RJ, Singleton SB, Kissenberth MJ, Cook C, Hawkins RJ (2011) Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Should Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.012
  9. 9.
    Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 23(6):662–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Craft DV, Moseley JB, Cawley PW, Noble PC (1996) Fixation strength of rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and the transosseous suture technique. J Should Elbow Surg 5(1):32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Carli A, Vadala A, Monaco E, Labianca L, Zanzotto E, Ferretti A (2005) Effect of cyclic loading on new polyblend suture coupled with different anchors. Am J Sports Med 33(2):214–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2007) Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1254–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fung YC (1984) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(2):219–224Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25(1):4–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hage JJ (2007) The Duncan loop: all knots and tangles. Arthroscopy 23(3):332–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harryman DT II, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA III (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73(7):982–989Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34(3):407–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klinger HM, Buchhorn GH, Heidrich G, Kahl E, Baums MH (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model: suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches compared with transosseous sutures using traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23(3):291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koganti AK, Adamson GJ, Gregersen CS, Pink MM, Shankwiler JA (2006) Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 34(11):1832–1838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2003) Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 19(9):1035–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(2):403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maguire M, Goldberg J, Bokor D, Bertollo N, Pelletier MH, Harper W, Walsh WR (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of four different transosseous-equivalent/suture bridge rotator cuff repairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9):1582–1587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahar A, Tamborlane J, Oka R, Esch J, Pedowitz RA (2007) Single-row suture anchor repair of the rotator cuff is biomechanically equivalent to double-row repair in a bovine model. Arthroscopy 23(12):1265–1270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1861–1868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(1):75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mochizuki T, Sugaya H, Uomizu M, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Akita K (2009) Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. Surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):1–7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22(12):1360.e1361–1360.e1365Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ (2007) Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elbow Surg 16(4):461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elbow Surg 16(4):469–4761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pauly S, Fiebig D, Kieser B, Albrecht B, Schill A, Scheibel M (2011) Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2090–2097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26(10):1281–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Petit CJ, Boswell R, Mahar A, Tasto J, Pedowitz RA (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 31(6):849–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scheibel MT, Habermeyer P (2003) A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Arthroscopy 19(3):330–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, Huijsmans PE, Bull AM, Amis AA, De Beer JF, Wallace AL (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(11):2425–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Spang JT, Buchmann S, Brucker PU, Kouloumentas P, Obst T, Schroder M, Burgkart R, Imhoff AB (2009) A biomechanical comparison of 2 transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques using bioabsorbable anchors: cyclic loading and failure behavior. Arthroscopy 25(8):872–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Viidik A (1979) Biomechanical behaviour of soft connective tissues. In: Akkas N, Aan de Rijn A (eds) Progress in biomechanics. Sijthoff and Nordhoff, The Netherlands, pp 75–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Werner Anderl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Philipp R. Heuberer
    • 1
  • Brenda Laky
    • 1
  • Bernhard Kriegleder
    • 1
  • Roland Reihsner
    • 2
  • Josef Eberhardsteiner
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySt. Vincent HospitalViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Mechanics of Materials and StructuresVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations