Advertisement

Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

  • Olufemi R. AyeniEmail author
  • Manraj Chahal
  • Michael N. Tran
  • Sheila Sprague
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To identify and evaluate the evidence for the pivot shift test as an outcome measure following ACL reconstruction. Achieving rotatory control of the knee post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been shown to increase patient satisfaction, decrease functional instability and potentially delay the development of osteoarthritis. The pivot shift is able to assess this rotatory component of knee laxity and appears to have the potential to become a benchmark in gauging the success of ACL surgery. Multiple confounding factors and discrepancies in performing the maneuver itself however put its usefulness in question. Thus, the literature was reviewed to assess whether the pivot shift was able to correlate with final functional outcomes.

Methods

Two reviewers searched two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) for randomized control trials that involved anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the last 5 years. All non-clinical studies were excluded. A quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Jadad scale by a reviewer. The number of studies using the Pivot Shift Test as well as the test’s relationship with functional outcome was evaluated.

Results

The literature search yielded 274 studies, of which 65 papers were included. The average Jadad quality score for papers reporting pivot shift as an outcome measure was 2.4, with the most frequent score being 3. Forty seven of 65 studies described the Pivot Shift Test as an outcome measure following ACL reconstruction. Of the 47 studies that included pivot shift as an outcome measure, 40 (85%) correlated with the final functional outcomes.

Conclusion

The pivot shift test is an important test following ACL reconstruction, and it correlates with functional outcomes.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Pivot shift Systematic review Outcomes Knee ligament 

Notes

Conflict of interest

No funding was received for the completion of this manuscript. There are no possible conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Ageberg E, Thomee R, Neeter C, Silbernagel KG, Roos EM (2008) Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum 59(12):1773–1779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2010) Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38(1):25–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahlden M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Sernert N (2009) Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(9):1117–1124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Fujita N, Tei K, Nishimoto K et al (2011) A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 35(3):439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K (2010) Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 38(8):1533–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bottoni CR, Liddell TR, Trainor TJ, Freccero DM, Lindell KK (2008) Postoperative range of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstrings: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 36(4):656–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capuano L, Hardy P, Longo UG, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2008) No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study. Knee 15(3):174–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2007) Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 35(2):189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chouteau J, Benareau I, Testa R, Fessy MH, Lerat JL, Moyen B (2008) Comparative study of knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without fluoroscopic assistance: a prospective study of 73 cases. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 128(9):945–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, McAlister FA, Salmi LR, Fergusson D et al (1999) Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 20(5):448–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conteduca F, Ferretti A, Mariani PP, Puddu G, Perugia L (1991) Chondromalacia and chronic anterior instabilities of the knee. Am J Sports Med 19:119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drogset JO, Strand T, Uppheim G, Odegard B, Boe A, Grontvedt T (2010) Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1085–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drogset JO, Straume LG, Bjorkmo I, Myhr G (2011) A prospective randomized study of ACL-reconstructions using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(5):753–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edgar CM, Zimmer S, Kakar S, Jones H, Schepsis AA (2008) Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(9):2238–2246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferretti A, Vadala A, De Carli A, Argento G, Conteduca F, Severini G (2008) Minimizing internal rotation strength deficit after use of semitendinosus for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a modified harvesting technique. Arthroscopy 24(7):786–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2010) A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Eng J Med 363(4):331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi M, Yagi M, Matsumoto A et al (2011) Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:906–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghalayini SR, Helm AT, Bonshahi AY, Lavender A, Johnson DS, Smith RB (2010) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament surgery: results of autogenous patellar tendon graft versus the leeds-keio synthetic graft five year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Knee 17(5):334–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harilainen A, Linko E, Sandelin J (2006) Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-Year clinical and radiological follow-up results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:517–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2009) A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices–rigidfix, BioScrew, and intrafix–randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37(4):699–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hart R, Krejzla J, Svab P, Kocis J, Stipcak V (2008) Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(5):569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holm I, Oiestad BE, Risberg MA, Aune AK (2010) No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38(3):448–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibrahim SA, Hamido F, Al Misfer AK, Mahgoob A, Ghafar SA, Alhran H (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring double bundle graft compared with single bundle procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1310–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jarvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(5):500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Paakkala T, Paakkala A (2008) Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy 24(12):1349–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 36(2):290–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jepsen CF, Lundberg JAK, Faunoe P (2007) Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arthroscopy 23(12):1326–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlström K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75:594–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kanaya A, Ochi M, Deie M, Adachi N, Nishimori M, Nakamae A (2009) Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(8):907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim SG, Kurosawa H, Sakuraba K, Ikeda H, Takazawa S (2006) The effect of initial graft tension on postoperative clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 126:260–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2002) Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 84(9):1560–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lane C, Warren R, Pearle A (2008) The pivot-shift. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:679–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laoruengthana A, Pattayakorn S, Chotanaputhi T, Kosiyatrakul A (2009) Clinical comparison between six-strand hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Med Assoc Thai 92(4):491–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Laxdal G, Kartus J, Eriksson BI, Faxen E, Sernert N, Karlsson J (2006) Biodegradable and metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using hamstring tendon grafts: prospective randomized study of radiographic results and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 34:1574–1580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S et al (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:771–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P, Johnson TR, Feagin J (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL: deficient knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:229–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon auto grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35(5):740–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ (2007) A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 35(3):384–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marks P, O’Donnell S, Yee G (2008) A pilot clinical evaluation comparing the mitek bone-tendon-bone cross pin and bioabsorbable screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation, a randomized double blind controlled trial. Knee 15(3):168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mauch F, Apic G, Becker U, Bauer G (2007) Differences in the placement of the tibial tunnel during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1824–1832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meunier A, Odensten M, Good L (2007) Long-term results after primary repair or non-surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a randomized study with a 15-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17(3):230–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moraiti CO, Stergiou N, Vasiliadis HS, Motsis E, Georgoulis A (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in alterations in gait variability. Gait Posture 32(2):169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A et al (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23(6):618–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Myers P, Logan M, Stokes A, Boyd K, Watts M (2008) Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 24(7):817–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Noh JH, Yi SR, Song SJ, Kim SW, Kim W (2011) Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and intrafix. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(5):816–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Papachristou G, Sourlas J, Plessas S, Papachristou K (2008) Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with delta plasty: an innovative approach with hamstrings’ transfer and double tibial tunnel. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(4):420–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park SJ, Jung YB, Jung HJ, Shin HK, Kim E, Song KS et al (2010) Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Arthroscopy 26:630–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35(4):564–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34:542–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Price R, Stoney J, Brown G (2010) Prospective randomized comparison of end button versus cross-pin femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2-year follow-up. ANZ J Surg 80(3):162–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Siarava E, Ntoulia A, Mitsionis G, Georgoulis AD (2009) Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9):2151–2158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Raviraj A, Anand A, Kodikal G, Chandrashekar M, Pai S (2010) A comparison of early and delayed arthroscopically-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):521–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H (2006) Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:730–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Komadina R, Dernovsek MZ (2008) The effect of graft choice on functional outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. IntOrthop 32(4):473–478Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K (2006) A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(12):1933–1940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sastre S, Popescu D, Nunez M, Pomes J, Tomas X, Peidro L (2010) Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(1):32–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(2):137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Siebold R, Kiss ZS, Morris HG (2008) Effect of compaction drilling during ACL reconstruction with hamstrings on postoperative tunnel widening. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 128(5):461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H (2008) Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(3):232–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stener S, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J (2010) A long-term, prospective, randomized study comparing biodegradable and metal interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: radiographic results and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 38(8):1598–1605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stengel D, Casper D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A, Wich M (2009) Bioresorbable pins and interference screws for fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 37(9):1692–1698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH, Xia CS, Zhang CL, Yu TB (2009) ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and irradiated fresh frozen allograft. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 10(4):306–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sun K, Tian S, Zhang J, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(5):464–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH, Xia CS, Zhang CL, Yu TB (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25(7):750–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Taylor DC, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, Duffey M, Tenuta J, Stoneman PD et al (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med 37(10):1946–1957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wang JQ, Ao YF, Yu CL, Liu P, Xu Y, Chen LX (2009) Clinical evaluation of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. Chin Med J (Engl) 122(6):706–711Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bonanzinga T, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S et al (2011) Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(3):390–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Russo A, Takazawa Y, Lo Presti M, Giordano G et al (2008) ST/G ACL reconstruction: double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18(5):573–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zhao J, He Y, Wang J (2007) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 23(7):766–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olufemi R. Ayeni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manraj Chahal
    • 2
  • Michael N. Tran
    • 1
  • Sheila Sprague
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of SurgeryMcMaster University Medical CenterHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations