Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 1815–1821 | Cite as

The value of preoperative grade of radiographic and histological changes in predicting pain relief after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

  • Henrik LundbladEmail author
  • Andris Kreicbergs
  • Veli Söderlund
  • Ann-Kristin Ulfgren
  • Carl-Olav Stiller
  • Karl-Åke Jansson
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Many attempts with contradictory results have been made to correlate different features of OA with pain. One reason may be that pain at rest and pain with movement are seldom considered separately although the mechanisms may be quite different. Furthermore, pain ratings are subject to individual interpretation making an inter-individual comparison questionable. By instead calculating the absolute and relative changes in pain on an intra-individual level after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we aimed at exploring a relationship between pain and radiological and histological changes.

Methods

In 69 patients undergoing TKA, preoperative radiographs and perioperative histological samples of the synovial membrane were graded for severity of osteoarthritic and inflammatory changes. The findings were related to the intensity of pain at rest and with movement both preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively according to the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

The radiographic and histological findings showed no significant correlation with the mean pre- or postoperative pain scores. Instead, change in pain with movement from pre- to postoperative was significantly related to the grade of radiographic osteoarthritis. Best pain relief by TKA was achieved in patients with severe radiographic changes. This, however, only applied to pain with movement.

Conclusions

Pain at rest and pain with movement may have different mechanisms. We believe that assessing the intensity of pain at rest and pain with movement separately and considering changes in pain on an individual level will be helpful strategies in future follow-up studies and efforts aimed at explaining the mechanisms of pain in OA.

Keywords

Pain Osteoarthritis Radiographic Histological Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Gunnar Edman for invaluable help with statistics, also Stockholm Specialistvård AB and Stockholm Spine Center for providing facilities for this study. The Karolinska Institutet and the Folksam research fund financially supported this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlback S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 277(Suppl):277–272Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW (1996) Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplast 11(7):831–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(7):893–900Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boeckstyns ME, Backer M (1989) Reliability and validity of the evaluation of pain in patients with total knee replacement. Pain 38(1):29–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Booth RE Jr (2006) The gender-specific (female) knee. Orthopedics 29(9):768–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J (2007) Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5–11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brenner SS, Klotz U, Alscher DM, Mais A, Lauer G, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Fritz P, Bierbach U (2004) Osteoarthritis of the knee—clinical assessments and inflammatory markers. Osteoarthr Cartil 12(6):469–475Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Silpipat S, Foojareonyos T, Roschan S, Reumthantong A (2007) The prevalence of thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 90(7):1342–1347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Creamer P, Hochberg MC (1997) Why does osteoarthritis of the knee hurt—sometimes? Br J Rheumatol 36(7):726–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Agostino MA, Conaghan P, Le Bars M, Baron G, Grassi W, Martin-Mola E, Wakefield R, Brasseur JL, So A, Backhaus M, Malaise M, Burmester G, Schmidely N, Ravaud P, Dougados M, Emery P (2005) EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum dis 64(12):1703–1709Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Barclay JD, Segal MR (1992) Correlates of knee pain among US adults with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 19(12):1943–1949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dieppe P, Basler HD, Chard J, Croft P, Dixon J, Hurley M, Lohmander S, Raspe H (1999) Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38(1):73–83Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, McAlindon T, Dieppe PA, Minor MA, Blair SN, Berman BM, Fries JF, Weinberger M, Lorig KR, Jacobs JJ, Goldberg V (2000) Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med 133(9):726–737Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D (1998) Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(2):163–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haywood L, McWilliams DF, Pearson CI, Gill SE, Ganesan A, Wilson D, Walsh DA (2003) Inflammation and angiogenesis in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(8):2173–2177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hill CL, Gale DG, Chaisson CE, Skinner K, Kazis L, Gale ME, Felson DT (2001) Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: association with knee pain in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 28(6):1330–1337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hofmann S, Seitlinger G, Djahani O, Pietsch M (2011) The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9):1442–1452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isiklar ZU, Landon GC, Tullos HS (1994) Amputation after failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:173–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Juni P, Reichenbach S, Dieppe P (2006) Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20(4):721–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Katz J, Melzack R (1999) Measurement of pain. Surg Clin N Am 79(2):231–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J (2008) Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplast 23(7):984–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J (2009) Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:52–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuzmanova SI, Solakov PT, Atanassov AN, Andreev SA (2000) Relevance between arthroscopic pathology and clinical characteristics in knee osteoarthritis. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 42(4):19–22Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lethbridge-Cejku M, Scott WW Jr, Reichle R, Ettinger WH, Zonderman A, Costa P, Plato CC, Tobin JD, Hochberg MC (1995) Association of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee with knee pain: data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Arthritis Care Res 8(3):182–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lundblad H, Kreicbergs A, Jansson KA (2008) Prediction of persistent pain after total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(2):166–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neogi T, Felson D, Niu J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, Sack B, Torner J, Bradley L, Zhang Y (2009) Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies. BMJ 339:b2844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS, Kehlet H (2006) Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50(4):495–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parvizi J, Johnson BG, Rowland C, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG (2001) Thirty-day mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(10):1524–1528Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW (1994) A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 56(2):217–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17(1):45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith MD, Triantafillou S, Parker A, Youssef PP, Coleman M (1997) Synovial membrane inflammation and cytokine production in patients with early osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 24(2):365–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R (1996) Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 27(4):485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toms AD, Mandalia V, Haigh R, Hopwood B (2009) The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2):143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vincent KR, Vincent HK, Lee LW, Alfano AP (2006) Outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients after inpatient rehabilitation: influence of age and gender. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85(6):482–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID (2007) Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee 14(6):417–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik Lundblad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andris Kreicbergs
    • 1
  • Veli Söderlund
    • 2
  • Ann-Kristin Ulfgren
    • 3
    • 4
  • Carl-Olav Stiller
    • 5
  • Karl-Åke Jansson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of OrthopaedicsKarolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, SolnaStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKarolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, SolnaStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Rheumatology Research Laboratory, CMM L8-004Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, SolnaStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Kibion ABUppsalaSweden
  5. 5.Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology UnitKarolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, SolnaStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations