Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 20, Issue 8, pp 1584–1593 | Cite as

Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Joon Ho Wang
  • Jae Gyoon KimEmail author
  • Do Kyung Lee
  • Hong Chul Lim
  • Jin Hwan Ahn
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate which technique would reduce bending stress at the femoral tunnel aperture and make short tunnel length after ACL reconstruction by comparing the femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between the single-bundle (SB) transtibial (TT) and double-bundle (DB) transportal (TP) technique using three-dimensional-computed tomography using OsiriX® imaging software.

Methods

Forty-nine patients underwent an ACL reconstruction using a SB TT (Group I, 20 patients) and DB TP (Group II, 29 patients) technique. Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel length were measured by CT image using OsiriX® imaging software. Groups I and II were compared, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

Results

The mean anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral graft bending angle of group II (111.5 ± 8.8° and 118.9 ± 9.8°, respectively) was significantly more acute than that of group I (125.3 ± 11.1°) (P < 0.001, P = 0.04). The mean femoral tunnel length of group I was significantly longer than that of group II (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The femoral graft bending angle and the femoral tunnel length of the TP technique performed in the maximally flexed knee position was more acute and shorter than those of the TT technique after ACL reconstruction. This might increase the bending stress at the femoral tunnel aperture and shorter graft length in the tunnel after an ACL reconstruction using TP technique compared to the TT technique.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

Knee Anterior cruciate ligament Transportal Transtibial 3D-CT OsiriX 

Notes

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest present in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Sumen Y (2000) Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:128–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn JH, Lee YS, Ha HC (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring autograft: technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1011–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2008) Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2009) Effect of knee flexion angle on length and orientation of posterolateral femoral tunnel drilled through anteromedial portal during anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:1108–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang CB, Yoo JH, Chung BJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2010) Oblique femoral tunnel placement can increase risks of short femoral tunnel and cross-pin protrusion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:1237–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekdahl M, Wang JH, Ronga M, Fu FH (2008) Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:935–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giron F, Buzzi R, Aglietti P (1999) Femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three techniques. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 15:750–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golish SR, Baumfeld JA, Schoderbek RJ, Miller MD (2007) The effect of femoral tunnel starting position on tunnel length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 23:1187–1192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greis PE, Burks RT, Bachus K, Luker MG (2001) The influence of tendon length and fit on the strength of a tendon-bone tunnel complex. A biomechanical and histologic study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 29:493–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang TW, Wang CJ, Weng LH, Chan YS (2003) Reducing the “killer turn” in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 19:712–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Horaguchi T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Full knee extension magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jabara MRF, Clancy WG (2005) Anatomic arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Tech Orthop 20:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim SJ, Chang JH, Kang YH, Song DH, Park KY (2009) Clinical comparison of anteromedial versus anterolateral tibial tunnel direction for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2 to 8 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:693–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kondo E, Yasuda K (2007) Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with postoperative knee stability. Arthroscopy 23:1198–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lubowitz JH, Konicek J (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique. Arthroscopy 26:1357–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E, Pietrobon R, Garrett WE, Higgins LD (2010) Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1059–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller CD, Gerdeman AC, Hart JM, Bennett CG, Golish SR, Gaskin C, Miller MD (2011) A comparison of 2 drilling techniques on the femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:372–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Natsu-ume T, Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Mae T (2001) Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstring tendons. A correlation between MRI changes and restored stability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:834–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neven E, D’Hooghe P, Bellemans J (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study on the posterolateral tunnel position and safety of the lateral structures. Arthroscopy 24:436–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:463.e1–463.e5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Otsubo H, Shino K, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Nakagawa S, Koyanagi M (2007) Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:720–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Piasecki DP, Bach BR, Espinoza Orias AA, Verma NN (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:1306–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sadoghi P, Kropfl A, Jansson V, Muller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T (2005) Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 21:439–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:206–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steiner ME (2009) Independent drilling of tibial and femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taketomi S, Nakagawa T, Takeda H, Nakajima K, Nakayama S, Fukai A, Hirota J, Kachi Y, Kawano H, Miura T, Fukui N, Nakamura K (2011) Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:424–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Toritsuka Y, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Hamada M, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H (2004) Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 20:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yamauchi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Hayashi K, Sakuma T, Takahashi H, Yanagawa N, Koda M (2010) Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci 17:756–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yamazaki S, Yasuda K, Tomita F, Minami A, Tohyama H (2006) The effect of intraosseous graft length on tendon-bone healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using flexor tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1086–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoo YS, Jeong WS, Shetty NS, Ingham SJ, Smolinski P, Fu F (2010) Changes in ACL length at different knee flexion angles: an in vivo biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:292–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zantop T, Ferretti M, Bell KM, Brucker PU, Gilbertson L, Fu FH (2008) Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: intra-articular study in a goat model. Am J Sports Med 36:2158–2166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joon Ho Wang
    • 1
  • Jae Gyoon Kim
    • 2
    Email author
  • Do Kyung Lee
    • 1
  • Hong Chul Lim
    • 2
  • Jin Hwan Ahn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of MedicineSungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of MedicineKorea UniversityGuro-gu, SeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of MedicineSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations