Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 1822–1830 | Cite as

The safety and short-term efficacy of a novel polyurethane meniscal scaffold for the treatment of segmental medial meniscus deficiency

  • Turgay EfeEmail author
  • Alan Getgood
  • Markus D. Schofer
  • Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
  • Dieter Mann
  • Jürgen R. J. Paletta
  • Thomas J. Heyse



Meniscal loss is associated with an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis. Tissue engineering solutions, which include the development of novel material scaffolds, are being utilised to aid the regeneration of meniscal tissue. The purpose of this study was to monitor the safety profile and the short-term efficacy of a novel polyurethane meniscal scaffold in the treatment of patients with painful knees following partial medial meniscectomy.


Ten consecutive patients with segmental tissue loss from the medial meniscus were treated with the arthroscopic implantation of an Actifit® (Orteq Sports Medicine) polyurethane meniscal scaffold. Patients were followed up at 2 and 6 weeks, then again at 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome measures included reporting of complications and patient-reported outcome scores (KOOS, KSS, UCLA Activity scale, VAS pain). Secondary outcome was MRI assessment at 6 and 12 months looking at scaffold morphology, integration and associated joint injury/inflammation.


Eight male and 2 female patients were included in the study with a mean age of 29 (range 18–45). No complications were reported. All patients were happy with their surgery. At 6 months, a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in all PROMS except the UCLA activity scale and VAS pain scale were noted. The improvement remained at 12 months. MRI analysis revealed the presence of scaffolds at 6 months, with evidence of some tissue integration in many improvements in scaffold morphology and ICRS classification of cartilage in the medial compartment were noted at 12 months. No synovitis was noted in the joint or adverse reactions in the other compartments.


The new Actifit® polyurethane scaffold has been shown to be a safe, effective implant, for the treatment of patients with pain as a result of segmental medial meniscus loss at 1 year.

Level of evidence



Meniscus scaffold Polyurethane Meniscectomy The painful knee 


Conflict of interest

AG is a paid consultant for Orteq Sports Medicine. None of the other authors have a conflict of interest to declare.


  1. 1.
    Ait Si Selmi T, Fithian D, Neyret P (2006) The evolution of osteoarthritis in 103 patients with ACL reconstruction at 17 years follow-up. Knee 13:353–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alford JW, Lewis P, Kang RW, Cole BJ (2005) Rapid progression of chondral disease in the lateral compartment of the knee following meniscectomy. Arthroscopy 21:1505–1509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedi A, Kelly NH, Baad M, Fox AJ, Brophy RH, Warren RF, Maher SA (2010) Dynamic contact mechanics of the medial meniscus as a function of radial tear, repair, and partial meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1398–1408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buma P, van Tienen T, Veth R (2007) The collagen meniscus implant. Expert Rev Med Devices 4:507–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burks RT, Metcalf MH, Metcalf RW (1997) Fifteen-year follow-up of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Arthroscopy 13:673–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavina C, Cossi CG, Pagliazzi A, Giorgi B, Grasso A (1984) Arthrography in the investigation of persistent pain after meniscectomy. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 10:363–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cole BJ, Dennis MG, Lee SJ, Nho SJ, Kalsi RS, Hayden JK, Verma NN (2006) Prospective evaluation of allograft meniscus transplantation: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:919–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Groot JH (2005) Polyurethane scaffolds for meniscal tissue regeneration. Med Device Technol 16:18–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Englund M, Lohmander LS (2004) Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum 50:2811–2819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Englund M, Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS (2001) Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fetzer GB, Spindler KP, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Jones M, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wolcott M, Vidal A, Wolf BR, Wright RW (2009) Potential market for new meniscus repair strategies: evaluation of the MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 22:180–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gastel JA, Muirhead WR, Lifrak JT, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Labrador DP (2001) Meniscal tissue regeneration using a collagenous biomaterial derived from porcine small intestine submucosa. Arthroscopy 17:151–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genovese E, Angeretti MG, Ronga M, Leonardi A, Novario R, Callegari L, Fugazzola C (2007) Follow-up of collagen meniscus implants by MRI. Radiol Med 112:1036–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Getgood A, Brooks R, Fortier L, Rushton N (2009) Articular cartilage tissue engineering: today’s research, tomorrow’s practice? J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:565–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hannink G, van Tienen TG, Schouten AJ, Buma P (2011) Changes in articular cartilage after meniscectomy and meniscus replacement using a biodegradable porous polymer implant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:441–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huskin JP, Vandekerckhove B, Delince P, Verdonk R, Dubuc JE, Willems S, Hardy P, Blanco FJ, Charrois O, Handelberg F (2008) Multicentre, prospective, open study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 in knee osteoarthritis subjects presenting with pain following arthroscopic meniscectomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang SW, Son SM, Lee JS, Lee ES, Lee KY, Park SG, Park JH, Kim BS (2006) Regeneration of whole meniscus using meniscal cells and polymer scaffolds in a rabbit total meniscectomy model. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:659–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lubowitz JH, Verdonk PC, Reid JB 3rd, Verdonk R (2007) Meniscus allograft transplantation: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:476–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lynch TC, Crues JV 3rd, Morgan FW, Sheehan WE, Harter LP, Ryu R (1989) Bone abnormalities of the knee: prevalence and significance at MR imaging. Radiology 171:761–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Waller MA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ, Prendergast PJ (2007) The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol Health Care 15:3–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pabbruwe MB, Kafienah W, Tarlton JF, Mistry S, Fox DJ, Hollander AP (2010) Repair of meniscal cartilage white zone tears using a stem cell/collagen-scaffold implant. Biomaterials 31:2583–2591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Duckwiler GR, Bassett LW, Anderson LJ, Gold RH (1986) Meniscal injuries: detection using MR imaging. Radiology 159:753–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodkey WG, DeHaven KE, Montgomery WH 3rd, Baker CL Jr, Beck CL Jr, Hormel SE, Steadman JR, Cole BJ, Briggs KK (2008) Comparison of the collagen meniscus implant with partial meniscectomy. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1413–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Li ST (1999) A clinical study of collagen meniscus implants to restore the injured meniscus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S (2003) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:17–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roos H, Lauren M, Adalberth T, Roos EM, Jonsson K, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum 41:687–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salata MJ, Gibbs AE, Sekiya JK (2010) A systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing meniscectomy. Am J Sports Med 38:1907–1916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stabile KJ, Odom D, Smith TL, Northam C, Whitlock PW, Smith BP, Van Dyke ME, Ferguson CM (2010) An acellular, allograft-derived meniscus scaffold in an ovine model. Arthroscopy 26:936–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stapleton TW, Ingram J, Fisher J, Ingham E (2011) Investigation of the regenerative capacity of an acellular porcine medial meniscus for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part A 17:231–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Steadman JR, Rodkey WG (2005) Tissue-engineered collagen meniscus implants: 5- to 6-year feasibility study results. Arthroscopy 21:515–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stein T, Mehling AP, Welsch F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Jager A (2010) Long-term outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 38:1542–1548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Terwee CB, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland SL, de Vet HC, Dekker J (2011) Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 19:620–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Testa Pezzin AP, Cardoso TP, do Carmo Alberto Rincon M, de de Carvalho Zavaglia CA, de de Rezende Duek EA (2003) Bioreabsorbable polymer scaffold as temporary meniscal prosthesis. Artif Organs 27:428–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tienen TG, Heijkants RG, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ, Schouten AJ, Veth RP, Buma P (2006) Replacement of the knee meniscus by a porous polymer implant: a study in dogs. Am J Sports Med 34:64–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Verdonk PC, Verstraete KL, Almqvist KF, De Cuyper K, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R (2006) Meniscal allograft transplantation: long-term clinical results with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging correlations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:694–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Verdonk R, Verdonk P, Huysse W, Forsyth R, Heinrichs EL (2011) Tissue ingrowth after implantation of a novel, biodegradable polyurethane scaffold for treatment of partial meniscal lesions. Am J Sports Med 39:774–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13:227–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zaffagnini S, Giordano G, Vascellari A, Bruni D, Neri MP, Iacono F, Kon E, Presti ML, Marcacci M (2007) Arthroscopic collagen meniscus implant results at 6 to 8 years follow up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:175–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Lopomo N, Bruni D, Giordano G, Ravazzolo G, Molinari M, Marcacci M (2011) Prospective long-term outcomes of the medial collagen meniscus implant versus partial medial meniscectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 39:977–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Turgay Efe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alan Getgood
    • 2
  • Markus D. Schofer
    • 1
  • Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
    • 1
  • Dieter Mann
    • 3
  • Jürgen R. J. Paletta
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Heyse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and RheumatologyUniversity Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine ClinicUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of TraumatologySankt Elisabeth HospitalGuterslohGermany

Personalised recommendations