Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?
- 1.7k Downloads
Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA.
Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment.
For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°.
Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.
KeywordsComputer-assisted surgery Navigation Total knee replacement TKR Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial
We thank all corresponding authors from the included studies for their assistance in obtaining relevant data that contributed to our study.
Conflict of interest
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
- 1.Bai YS, Zhang Y, Chen ZQ, Wang CF, Zhao YC, Shi ZC, Li M, Liu KP (2010) Learning curve of computer-assisted navigation system in spine surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:2889–2894Google Scholar
- 7.Beaver RJ, Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2006) A prospective randomized controlled trial of computer assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:475Google Scholar
- 19.Choi WC, Lee S, An JH, Kim D, Seong SC, Lee MC (2010) Plain radiograph fails to reflect the alignment and advantages of navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.020
- 21.Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Teeraleekul K, Kraturerk C (2008) Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. J Med Assoc Thail 91:1382–1388Google Scholar
- 25.Czurda T, Fennema P, Baumgartner M, Ritschl P (2010) The association between component malalignment and post-operative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results of a cohort/nested case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:863–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Gao H, Luo CF, Hu CF, Zhang CQ, Zeng BF (2011) Minimally invasive fluoro-navigation screw fixation for the treatment of pelvic ring injuries. Surg Innov. doi: 10.1177/1553350611399587
- 37.Gregori A, Holt G (2007) Re: navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1867–1868Google Scholar
- 47.Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1107–1112Google Scholar
- 48.Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:709–714Google Scholar
- 50.Julin J, Jämsen E, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T (2010) Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 81:413–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ (2006) Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:198–202Google Scholar
- 59.Leun KS (2010) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: present status and future perspectives. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:2967–2968Google Scholar
- 68.Mason JB, Fehring T, Fahrbach K (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:2547–2548Google Scholar
- 77.Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A (2007) Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty 22:953–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 81.Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Ong J, Lo NN (2011) Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3
- 90.Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure: results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 87:18–28Google Scholar
- 94.Shao JJ, Zhang XL, Wang Q, Chen YS, Shen H, Jiang Y (2010) Total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation in patients with severe valgus deformity of the knee. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:2666–2670Google Scholar
- 98.Sikorski JM (2008) Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 90:1121–1127Google Scholar
- 101.Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW (2011) Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc19:1069–1076Google Scholar
- 103.Song F, Eastwood AJ, Gilbody S, Duley L, Sutton AJ (2000) Publication and related biases. Health Technol Assess 4:1–115Google Scholar
- 104.Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85:830–835Google Scholar
- 106.Spencer SJ, Baird K, Young D, Tait GR (2011) The rotaglide mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. A 10–13 year review from an independent centre. Knee. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.11.013