Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 1394–1398 | Cite as

Endoscopic treatment of posteriorly localized talar cysts

  • Tahir Ogut
  • Ali SekerEmail author
  • Fulya Ustunkan



This study presents the short-term follow-up results from our case series of patients with posteriorly localized intraosseous talar cysts. Patients were treated via hindfoot endoscopy in the prone position.


We evaluated six ankles of five patients treated with hindfoot endoscopy for intraosseous cysts localized to the posterior portion of talus. Three patients were men and two were women. The median age of the patients was 34 (22–40) years. The bilateral case was treated with a sole operation. The median preoperative AOFAS score was 69 (38–72) points. Additionally, all patients were found to have flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendinitis in clinical and radiologic evaluations; large os trigoni were detected in five affected ankles. Debridement of scar tissue and FHL tendinitis, resection of os trigoni, and curettage and grafting of the cysts were completed endoscopically with one surgery. The cavities were filled with autografts in all patients except one. Hydroxyapatite was used in one case. The pathologic diagnoses were intraosseous ganglia in three feet and simple bone cysts in the remainder. The preoperative diagnoses were unchanged postoperatively.


The median postoperative follow-up was 27 (12–74) months. In all patients, graft union was confirmed with computed tomography. The median AOFAS score improved to 90 (75–100) points postoperatively. There were no complications. All patients were satisfied with their results.


Hindfoot endoscopy can be used for the treatment of intraosseous talar cysts that are posteriorly localized. Significant advantages of this method include lower morbidity and shorter postoperative hospitalization time. Hindfoot endoscopy is a safe and effective method for treating talar cystic lesions and is an attractive option for experienced arthroscopic surgeons.

Level of evidence



Talus Endoscopic treatment Arthroscopy Cystic lesion 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 13914 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 12622 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 10250 kb)


  1. 1.
    Baker CL, Parisien JS (1996) Arthroscopic surgery in osteocartilaginous lesions of the ankle. In: McGinty JB (ed) Operative arthroscopy, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp 1157–1172Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bisbinas I, De Silva U, Grimer RJ (2004) Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle: a 12-year experience from a tertiary orthopedic oncology unit. J Foot Ankle Surg 43:407–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnesale PG (2003) Benign tumors of bone. In: Canale ST (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 793–812Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flandry F, Hughston JC (1987) Pigmented villonodular synovitis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:942–949Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krause FG, Wroblewski JA, Younger AS (2009) Pigmented villonodular synovitis in both hindfeet. Can J Surg 52:E38–E39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neubauer P, Weber AK, Miller NH et al (2007) Pigmented villonodular synovitis in children: a report of six cases and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 27:90–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nigrisoli P, Beltrami P (1971) Subchondral cysts of bone. Lo Scapello 1:65–75Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scholten PE, Altena MC, Krips R et al (2003) Treatment of a large intraosseous talar ganglion by means of hindfoot endoscopy. Arthroscopy 19:96–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz HS, Unni KK, Pritchard DJ (1989) Pigmented villonodular synovitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 247:243–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stone JW, Guhl JF (1995) Ankle arthroscopy in the management of osteochondral lesions. In: Parisien JS (ed) Current techniques in arthroscopy. Current Medicine, Philadelphia, pp 226–237Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ugai K, Morimoto K (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of pigmented villonodular synovitis in subtalar joint: report of a case. Clin Orthop Relat Res 283:281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urguden M (2009) Ayak Bileginin Eklem İci Tumorleri ve Tumore Benzer Olusumları. In: Aydın AT (ed) Ayak Bileği Artroskopisi. Orkun Ozan Medya Hizmetleri AS, Antalya, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uysal M, Akpinar S, Ozalay M et al (2005) Arthroscopic debridement and grafting of an intraosseous talar ganglion. Arthroscopy 21:1269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Dijk CN (2004) Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle pain. In: Guhl JF, Parisien JS, Boynton MD (eds) Foot and ankle arthroscopy, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Dijk CN, De Leeuw PA, Scholten PE (2009) Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle impingement. Surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(Suppl 2):287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R (2000) A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy 16:871–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Dijk CN, Stibbe AB, Marti RK (2002) Posterior ankle impingement. In: Nyska M, Mann G (eds) The unstable ankle. Human Kinetics, Illinois, pp 139–148Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyIstanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations