Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 1249–1257 | Cite as

Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts

  • Yasuyuki Kawaguchi
  • Eiji Kondo
  • Nobuto Kitamura
  • Shuken Kai
  • Masayuki Inoue
  • Kazunori Yasuda
Knee

Abstract

Purpose

Authors have hypothesized that the incidence and the degree of femoral tunnel enlargement after the hamstring ACL reconstruction may be significantly less in the anatomic double-bundle procedure than in single-bundle procedure. The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis.

Methods

Seventy-two patients who underwent single-bundle reconstruction (Group S) and 97 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle reconstruction (Group D) were followed up for 2 years after surgery. The hamstring tendon grafts were used in each procedure. All of the 169 patients were examined with computed radiography, and the standard clinical evaluation methods.

Results

In Group S, the incidence of femoral tunnel enlargement was 48.6 and 54.2% in the anteroposterior and lateral views. In Group D, the incidence of femoral anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel enlargement was 36.1 and 23.7%, respectively, in the anteroposterior view, and that of femoral anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel enlargement was 33.0 and 21.6%, respectively, in the lateral view. The incidence of femoral tunnel enlargement was significantly less in Group D than in Group S (P < 0.0133). Concerning the degree of the tunnel enlargement, a similar tendency with statistical significance was observed (P < 0.0001). In each group, there were no significant relationships between the degree of tunnel enlargement and each clinical measure.

Conclusion

Both the incidence and the degree of femoral tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle reconstruction with the hamstring tendon grafts are significantly less than those after single-bundle reconstruction with the same graft.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative cohort study, Level II.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Tunnel enlargement Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction Hamstring tendon graft Clinical outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N (2007) Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A (2002) A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cinar BM, Akpinar S, Hersekli MA, Uysal M, Cesur N, Pourbagher A, Derincek A (2009) The effects of two different fixation methods on femoral bone tunnel enlargement and clinical results in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43:515–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU, Bartlett RJ (1999) Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:138–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espejo-Baena A, Serrano-Fernandez JM, de la Torre-Solis F, Irizar-Jimenez S (2009) Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with femoral cortical bone bridge support using hamstrings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fahey M, Indelicato PA (1994) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Am J Sports Med 22:410–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fink C, Zapp M, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Hoser C, Rieger M (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 17:138–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Getelman MH, Friedman MJ (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:189–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hantes ME, Liantsis AK, Basdekis GK, Karantanas AH, Christel P, Malizos KN (2010) Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Am J Sports Med 38:1618–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogervorst T, van der Hart CP, Pels Rijcken TH, Taconis WK (2000) Abnormal bone scans of the tibial tunnel 2 years after patella ligament anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation with tunnel enlargement and tibial graft length. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:322–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jagodzinski M, Foerstemann T, Mall G, Krettek C, Bosch U, Paessler HH (2005) Analysis of forces of ACL reconstructions at the tunnel entrance: is tunnel enlargement a biomechanical problem? J Biomech 38:23–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:290–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Järvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Järvela T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized clinical study with two-year results. Am J Sports Med 36:290–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Järvela T, Moisala AS, Paakkala T, Paakkala A (2008) Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy 24:1349–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jo H, Jun DS, Lee DY, Lee SH, Seong SC, Lee MC (2004) Tibial tunnel area changes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with autogenous patellar tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanaya A, Ochi M, Deie M, Adachi N, Nishimori M, Nakamae A (2009) Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linn RM, Fischer DA, Smith JP, Burstein DB, Quick DC (1993) Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 21:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:234–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mae T, Shino K, Matsumoto N, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Iwahashi T (2006) Force sharing between two grafts in the anatomical two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:505–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miyata K, Yasuda K, Kondo E, Nakano H, Kimura S, Hara N (2000) Biomechanical comparisons of anterior cruciate ligament: reconstruction procedures with flexor tendon graft. J Orthop Sci 5:585–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petersen W, Tretow H, Weimann A, Herbort M, Fu FH, Raschke M, Zantop T (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of two techniques for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one tibial tunnel versus two tibial tunnels. Am J Sports Med 35:228–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peyrache MD, Djian P, Christel P, Witvoet J (1996) Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4:2–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siebolt R (2007) Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siebold R, Cafaltzis K (2010) Differentiation between intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel widening and communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 26:1066–1073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simonian PT, Erickson MS, Larson RV, O’Kane JW (2000) Tunnel expansion after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 1-incision EndoButton femoral fixation. Arthroscopy 16:707–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H (2008) Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:232–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Toritsuka Y, Amano H, Kuwano M, Iwai T, Mae T, Ohzono K, Shino K (2009) Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:456–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:86–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson TC, Kantaras A, Atay A, Johnson DL (2004) Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 32:543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yamanaka M, Yasuda K, Tohyama H, Nakano H, Wada T (1999) The effect of cyclic displacement on the biomechanical characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 27:772–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yasuda K, Kitamura N, Kondo E, Hayashi R, Inoue M (2009) One-stage anatomic double-bundle anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the autogenous hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:800–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomical reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Anatomical and clinical studies. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: Comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1997) Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes. Am J Sports Med 25:99–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zijl J, Kleipool A, Willems W (2000) Comparison of tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft or allograft. Am J Sports Med 28:547–551PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuyuki Kawaguchi
    • 1
  • Eiji Kondo
    • 1
  • Nobuto Kitamura
    • 1
  • Shuken Kai
    • 1
  • Masayuki Inoue
    • 2
  • Kazunori Yasuda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sports Medicine and Joint SurgeryHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic surgeryNTT East Japan Sapporo HospitalSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations