MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors
- 528 Downloads
Adequate labral restorations after Bankart repair have been demonstrated in cadaver models for knot-tying and knotless anchors and in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging for knot tying. The influence of glenoidal bio-degradation on clinical outcome, and conclusions regarding drill hole enlargement and foreign body reactions remain controversial.
The labrum was analyzed in magnetic resonance images for 37 consecutive patients with Bankart repair using knotless PLLA anchors and for 31 volunteers as radiologic controls. The labrum was assessed regarding slope, height index (quotient between labral height to the glenoid height), and labrum morphology in axial and coronal T2 images. Glenoidal bio-degradation was graded in terms of the drill hole configuration in T1 images and the corresponding osseous reaction in T2 images. Constant-Murley, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scoring were carried out preoperatively and at follow-up.
At 15 months after arthroscopy, the anterior slope (24.8°), height index (3.0), inferior slope (25.4°), and height index (2.5) were not significantly different from control values. Morphologic analysis revealed significant changes in the Bankart group (P < 0.05) that were influenced by the number of preoperative dislocations. Bio-degradation proceeded slowly with no evidence of drill hole enlargement. Osseous reactions were significantly greater in inferior compared to superior implants. The clinical scores were excellent and were not influenced by bio-degradation.
Knotless anchors facilitate labral restoration that is comparable to the knot-tying approach. Bio-degradation proceeds slowly without clinical or radiologic evidence of foreign body reactions.
Level of evidence
KeywordsBankart repair Labrum restoration Bio-degradation Knotless anchor
The authors thank for the assistance of Dr. rer. med. Hanns Ackermann, Manuela Ahr, Katja Hähnel and Gamze Tercan for collecting and analyzing of the data. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging were supported by a research fund of Arthrex (Naples, USA).
- 5.Bostman OM, Pihlajamaki HK (2000) Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:216–227Google Scholar
- 8.Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164Google Scholar
- 11.Elmlund AO, Kartus J, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2009) A 7-year prospective, randomized, clinical, and radiographic study after arthroscopic bankart reconstruction using 2 different types of absorbable tack. Am J Sports Med 10:1930–1937Google Scholar
- 17.Hobby J, Griffin D, Dunbar M, Boileau P (2007) Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilisation of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies including 3044 arthroscopic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1188–1196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lippitt S, Matsen F (1993) Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 291:20–28Google Scholar
- 29.Randelli M, Gambrioli PL, Failoni S, Gallazzi M (2001) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Dunitz, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 34.Slabaugh MA, Friel NA, Wang VM, Cole BJ (2010) Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs. Arthroscopy 26:587–591Google Scholar