Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 1771–1779 | Cite as

MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors

  • T. Stein
  • A. P. Mehling
  • C. Reck
  • J. Buckup
  • T. Efe
  • R. Hoffmann
  • A. Jäger
  • F. Welsch
Shoulder

Abstract

Purpose

Adequate labral restorations after Bankart repair have been demonstrated in cadaver models for knot-tying and knotless anchors and in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging for knot tying. The influence of glenoidal bio-degradation on clinical outcome, and conclusions regarding drill hole enlargement and foreign body reactions remain controversial.

Methods

The labrum was analyzed in magnetic resonance images for 37 consecutive patients with Bankart repair using knotless PLLA anchors and for 31 volunteers as radiologic controls. The labrum was assessed regarding slope, height index (quotient between labral height to the glenoid height), and labrum morphology in axial and coronal T2 images. Glenoidal bio-degradation was graded in terms of the drill hole configuration in T1 images and the corresponding osseous reaction in T2 images. Constant-Murley, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scoring were carried out preoperatively and at follow-up.

Results

At 15 months after arthroscopy, the anterior slope (24.8°), height index (3.0), inferior slope (25.4°), and height index (2.5) were not significantly different from control values. Morphologic analysis revealed significant changes in the Bankart group (P < 0.05) that were influenced by the number of preoperative dislocations. Bio-degradation proceeded slowly with no evidence of drill hole enlargement. Osseous reactions were significantly greater in inferior compared to superior implants. The clinical scores were excellent and were not influenced by bio-degradation.

Conclusions

Knotless anchors facilitate labral restoration that is comparable to the knot-tying approach. Bio-degradation proceeds slowly without clinical or radiologic evidence of foreign body reactions.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

Bankart repair Labrum restoration Bio-degradation Knotless anchor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank for the assistance of Dr. rer. med. Hanns Ackermann, Manuela Ahr, Katja Hähnel and Gamze Tercan for collecting and analyzing of the data. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging were supported by a research fund of Arthrex (Naples, USA).

References

  1. 1.
    Athanasiou KA, Agrawal CM, Barber FA, Burkhart SS (1998) Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers. Arthroscopy 14:726–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’Driscoll SW (2006) Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1840–1845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bach FD, Carlier RY, Elis JB et al (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid interference screws: MR imaging follow-up. Radiology 225:541–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bostman OM, Laitinen OM, Tynninen O, Salminen ST, Pihlajamaki HK (2005) Tissue restoration after resorption of polyglycolide and poly-laevo-lactic acid screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1575–1580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bostman OM, Pihlajamaki HK (2000) Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:216–227Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bottoni CR, Smith EL, Berkowitz MJ, Towle RB, Moore JH (2006) Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization for recurrent anterior instability: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 34:1730–1737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cho NS, Lubis AM, Ha JH, Rhee YG (2006) Clinical results of arthroscopic bankart repair with knot-tying and knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy 22:1276–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edwards DJ, Hoy G, Saies AD, Hayes MG (1994) Adverse reactions to an absorbable shoulder fixation device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:230–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Funck E et al (2000) Absorbable implants for open shoulder stabilization: a clinical and serial radiographic evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:93–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elmlund AO, Kartus J, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2009) A 7-year prospective, randomized, clinical, and radiographic study after arthroscopic bankart reconstruction using 2 different types of absorbable tack. Am J Sports Med 10:1930–1937Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fehringer EV, Schmidt GR, Boorman RS et al (2003) The anteroinferior labrum helps center the humeral head on the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:53–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freehill MQ, Harms DJ, Huber SM, Atlihan D, Buss DD (2003) Poly-L-lactic acid tack synovitis after arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 31:643–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gohlke F, Daum P, Bushe C (1994) The stabilizing function of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Current aspects of the biomechanics of instability. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 132:112–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gohlke F, Schneider P, Siegel K, Balzer C (1993) Tensile strength of various anchor systems in surgical correction of instability of the shoulder joint. Unfallchirurg 96:546–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Habermeyer P, Gleyze P, Rickert M (1999) Evolution of lesions of the labrum-ligament complex in posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:66–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hobby J, Griffin D, Dunbar M, Boileau P (2007) Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilisation of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies including 3044 arthroscopic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1188–1196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffmann R, Weller A, Helling HJ, Krettek C, Rehm KE (1997) Local foreign body reactions to biodegradable implants. A classification. Unfallchirurg 100:658–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U (2009) No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:844–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Law BK, Yung PS, Ho EP, Chang JJ, Chan KM (2008) The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Warner JJ (2004) Total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral density in different regions of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:344–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lippitt S, Matsen F (1993) Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 291:20–28Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnusson L, Ejerhed L, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2006) A prospective, randomized, clinical and radiographic study after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction using 2 different types of absorbable tacks. Arthroscopy 22:143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Metcalf MH, Pon JD, Harryman DT II, Loutzenheiser T, Sidles JA (2001) Capsulolabral augmentation increases glenohumeral stability in the cadaver shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:532–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mueller MB, Fredrich HH, Steinhauser E et al (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions. Arthroscopy 21:611–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Seroyer ST, Romeo AA (2009) Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 25:788–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oh JH, Lee HK, Kim JY, Kim SH, Gong HS (2009) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic glenoid labrum repair with the bioknotless suture anchor. Am J Sports Med 37:2340–2348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Radford MJ, Noakes J, Read J, Wood DG (2005) The natural history of a bioabsorbable interference screw used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a 4-strand hamstring technique. Arthroscopy 21:707–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Randelli M, Gambrioli PL, Failoni S, Gallazzi M (2001) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Dunitz, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roth CA, Bartolozzi AR, Ciccotti MG et al (1998) Failure properties of suture anchors in the glenoid and the effects of cortical thickness. Arthroscopy 14:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW (1978) The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scheibel M, Nikulka C, Dick A et al (2007) Structural integrity and clinical function of the subscapularis musculotendinous unit after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization. Am J Sports Med 35:1153–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sileo MJ, Lee SJ, Kremenic IJ et al (2009) Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears. Arthroscopy 25:348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Slabaugh MA, Friel NA, Wang VM, Cole BJ (2010) Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs. Arthroscopy 26:587–591Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spatschil A, Landsiedl F, Anderl W et al (2006) Posttraumatic anterior-inferior instability of the shoulder: arthroscopic findings and clinical correlations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Take Y, Yoneda M, Hayashida K, Nakagawa S, Mizuno N (2008) Enlargement of drill holes after use of a biodegradable suture anchor: quantitative study on consecutive postoperative radiographs. Arthroscopy 24:251–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thal R, Nofziger M, Bridges M, Kim JJ (2007) Arthroscopic Bankart repair using Knotless or BioKnotless suture anchors: 2- to 7-year results. Arthroscopy 23:367–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Uggen C, Wei A, Glousman RE et al (2009) Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions. Arthroscopy 25:1085–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Urayama M, Itoi E, Sashi R, Minagawa H, Sato K (2003) Capsular elongation in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocation. Quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance arthrography. Am J Sports Med 31:64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Waldt S, Burkart A, Imhoff AB et al (2005) Anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of MR arthrography in the classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous injuries. Radiology 237:578–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Sudkamp NP (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16:305–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wetzler MJ, Bartolozzi AR, Gillespie MJ et al (1996) Fatigue properties of suture anchors in anterior shoulder reconstructions: Mitek GII. Arthroscopy 12:687–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yoo JC, Lee YS, Tae SK et al (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of a repaired capsulolabral complex after arthroscopic bankart repair. Am J Sports Med 36:2310–2316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Stein
    • 1
    • 4
  • A. P. Mehling
    • 1
  • C. Reck
    • 2
  • J. Buckup
    • 1
  • T. Efe
    • 4
  • R. Hoffmann
    • 3
  • A. Jäger
    • 1
  • F. Welsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sporttraumatology—Knee- and Shoulder-SurgeryBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany
  3. 3.Department of Trauma and Orthopedic SurgeryBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedics and RheumatologyUniversity Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations