The use of the Tegner Activity Scale for articular cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review




The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was developed in 1984 and has been widely used in studies on knee populations. The primary objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review on the use of the TAS for articular cartilage repair (ACR) of the knee.


A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus™, NHS Evidence, ISI Web of Knowledge, AMED, BNI, PEDro and The Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews) and reference lists from extracted articles. Studies were selected that were published between 1984 and 2009 in which the TAS was reported for patients who had undergone ACR of the knee.


The search strategy identified 442 citations of which 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a large degree of study heterogeneity especially regarding data reporting a wide variation in the number of participants (range 5–137), participant age (range 12–76 years), follow-up time (range 3–120 months) and male-to-female participant ratio. Where pre- to postoperative TAS change was analysed, 88% of studies demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative TAS scores.


In general, TAS data were inconsistently reported and methodological detail was often lacking. Caution is advised in the interpretation of TAS scores following ACR of the knee where there are large ranges in postoperative follow-up times, mixed gender cohorts and wide ranges in participant ages. TAS data should be presented and analysed fully and ideally in a standardised fashion to facilitate the comparison of outcomes between studies.


Physical activity Knee Articular cartilage Outcome assessment Cartilage repair 


  1. 1.
    Asik M, Ciftci F, Sen C, Erdil M, Atalar A (2008) The microfracture technique for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of the knee: midterm results. Arthroscopy 24:1214–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber FA, Chow JC (2006) Arthroscopic chondral osseous autograft transplantation (COR procedure) for femoral defects. Arthroscopy 22:10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber FA, Iwasko NG (2006) Treatment of grade III femoral chondral lesions: mechanical chondroplasty versus monopolar radiofrequency probe. Arthroscopy 22:1312–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behrens P, Bitter T, Kurz B, Russlies M (2006) Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)-5-year follow-up. Knee 13:194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2006) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:698–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37:890–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briggs KK, Steadman JR, Hay CJ, Hines SL (2009) Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees. Am J Sports Med 37:898–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carifio J, Perla R (2008) Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ 42:1150–1152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherubino P, Grassi FA, Bulgheroni E, Ronga M (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report. J Ortho Surg 11:10–15Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davidson PA, Carter TR (2007) Osteochondral allograft transplantation. Oper Tech Sports Med 15:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW, Dawson PE, Rozin R (2007) Clinical, histologic, and radiographic outcomes of distal femoral resurfacing with hypothermically stored osteoarticular allografts. Am J Sports Med 35:1082–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forrest M, Andersen B (1986) Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 292:537–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Simultaneous arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes and high tibial osteotomy for tibial chondral defects in the varus knee. Knee 15:309–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frobell RB, Svensson E, Gothrick M, Roos EM (2008) Self-reported activity level and knee function in amateur football players: the influence of age, gender, history of knee injury and level of competition. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:713–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gigante A, Enea D, Greco F, Bait C, Denti M, Schonhuber H, Volpi P (2009) Distal realignment and patellar autologous chondrocyte implantation: mid-term results in a selected population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:2–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. University of Cambridge, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gobbi A, Francisco R (2006) Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1021–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Boldrini L, Bathan L, Marcacci M (2009) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1083–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K (2005) Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halasi T, Kynsburg A, Tallay A, Berkes I (2004) Development of a new activity score for the evaluation of ankle instability. Am J Sports Med 32:899–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hambly K, Bobic V, Wondrasch B, Van Assche D, Marlovits S (2006) Autologous chondrocyte implantation postoperative care and rehabilitation: science and practice. Am J Sports Med 34:1020–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hambly K, Griva K (2008) IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? Am J Sports Med 36:1695–1704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jakobsson U (2004) Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scand J Caring Sci 18:437–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jamieson S (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ 38:1217–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karataglis D, Learmonth DJA (2005) Management of big osteochondral defects of the knee using osteochondral allografts with the mega-oats technique. Knee 12:389–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim MK, Choi SW, Kim SR, Oh IS, Won MH (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee using fibrin. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grontvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, Roberts S, Solheim E, Strand T, Johansen O (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2105–2112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1139–1145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37:33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar V, Panagoupolous A, Triantafyllopoulos JK, van Niekerk L (2008) Two stage autologous chondrocyte implantation for large full thickness cartilage defects in high demand patients: results after 2 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B:324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    LaValley MP, Felson DT (2002) Statistical presentation and analysis of ordered categorical outcome data in rheumatology journals. Arthritis Rheum 47:255–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lunn PD (2010) The sports and exercise life-course: a survival analysis of recall data from Ireland. Soc Sci Med 70:711–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ma HL, Hung SC, Wang ST, Chang MC, Chen TH (2004) Osteochondral autografts transfer for post-traumatic osteochondral defect of the knee—2 to 5 years follow-up. Injury 35:1286–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marcacci M, Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Busacca M, Zaffagnini S (2007) Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:2014–2021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marder RA, Hopkins G Jr, Timmerman LA (2005) Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments. Arthroscopy 21:152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marx RG (2003) Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy 19:1103–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:213–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McNickle AG, L’Heureux DR, Yanke AB, Cole BJ (2009) Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in a diverse patient population. Am J Sports Med 37:1344–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miller BS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Rodkey WG (2004) Patient satisfaction and outcome after microfracture of the degenerative knee. J Knee Surg 17:13–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mithoefer K, Hambly K, Della Villa S, Silvers H, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Return to sports participation after articular cartilage repair in the knee: scientific evidence. Am J Sports Med 37:167S–176SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mithoefer K, Minas T, Peterson L, Yeon H, Micheli LJ (2005) Functional outcome of knee articular cartilage repair in adolescent athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:1147–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mithoefer K, Peterson L, Mandelbaum BR, Minas T (2005) Articular cartilage repair in soccer players with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: functional outcome and return to competition. Am J Sports Med 33:1639–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2006) High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: a prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique. Am J Sports Med 34:1413–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  49. 49.
    Pascual-Garrido C, Slabaugh MA, L’Heureux DR, Friel NA, Cole BJ (2009) Recommendations and treatment outcomes for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation: prospective evaluation at average 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:33S–41SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Paxton E, Fithian D, Stone M, Silva P (2003) The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med 31:487–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rangaswamy L (1998) Conversations with a cab driver. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1407–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Salzmann GM, Paul J, Bauer JS, Woertler K, Sauerschnig M, Landwehr S, Imhoff AB, Schottle PB (2009) T2 assessment and clinical outcome following autologous matrix-assisted chondrocyte and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1576–1582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smith TO, Davies L, O’Driscoll ML, Donell ST (2008) An evaluation of the clinical tests and outcome measures used to assess patellar instability. Knee 15:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Spahn G, Kahl E, Muckley T, Hofmann GO, Klinger HM (2008) Arthroscopic knee chondroplasty using a bipolar radiofrequency-based device compared to mechanical shaver: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:565–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Spahn G, Kirschbaum S (2005) Operative treatment of deep chondral defects of the patella: Results after abrasive arthroplasty and periosteal arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:352–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sterett WI, Steadman JR (2004) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. Am J Sports Med 32:1243–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stevens SS (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103:677–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Suk M, Hanson BP, Norvell DC, Helfet DL (2005) AO handbook: musculoskeletal outcomes measures and instruments. Thieme, Davos PlatzGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tegner Y (1985) Cruciate ligament injuries in the knee: Evaluation and rehabilitation. Dissertation, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tetta C, Busacca M, Moio A, Rinaldi R, Delcogliano M, Kon E, Filardo G, Marcacci M, Albisinni U (2009) Knee osteochondral autologous transplantation: long-term MR findings and clinical correlations. Eur J Radiol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.011
  63. 63.
    Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2007) Self-efficacy, symptoms and physical activity in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:238–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Visna P, Pasa L, Cizmar I, Hart R, Hoch J (2004) Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the knee using autologous chondrograft transplantation and by abrasive techniques—a randomized controlled study. Acta Chir Belg 104:709–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wallgren K, Norlin R, Gillquist J (1987) Activity score for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Acta Orthop Scand 58:453Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Weitzel P, Richmond J (2002) Critical evaluation of different scoring systems of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 10:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wondrasch B, Zak L, Welsch GH, Marlovits S (2009) Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle on radiographic and clinical outcome after 2 years: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Sports Med 37:88S–96SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zeifang F, Oberle D, Nierhoff C, Richter W, Moradi B, Schmitt H (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using the original periosteum-cover technique versus matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:924–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sports Studies, Medway BuildingUniversity of KentChatham Maritime, KentUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Life SciencesLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations