The anatomic approach to primary, revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- 622 Downloads
The anatomic approach is gaining popularity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It is predominantly applied during primary ACL reconstruction. However, following the same principles as during primary surgery, the anatomic approach can also be applied during revision and augmentation surgery. This paper discusses the surgical technique for anatomic single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction, for primary, revision and augmentation surgery. During primary reconstruction, the choice for single- or double-bundle reconstruction and graft size should be based on ACL insertion site and femoral intercondylar notch dimensions. When there is an isolated anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle rupture, augmentation of a single-bundle can be performed while protecting the integrity of the intact bundle. Especially during revision surgery, there are many potential situations the surgeon may encounter when entering the knee. There are multiple possible solutions for all of these different situations leading to an anatomic end result. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scanning should be used to evaluate the current tunnel positions and determine the operative strategy.
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament ACL Anatomic Primary reconstruction Revision Augmentation
Our department receives funding from Smith and Nephew to support research related to reconstruction of the ACL. The research that forms the basis for this manuscript was done at our institution.
- 4.Cohen SB, Fu FH (2007) Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal. Arthroscopy 23: 325, e321–325Google Scholar
- 6.Dandy DJ (1996) Basic technique: the standard approach. In: McGinty JB (ed) Operative arthroscopy. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 252–253Google Scholar
- 7.Dustmann M, Schmidt T, Gangey I, Unterhauser FN, Weiler A, Scheffler SU (2008) The extracellular remodeling of free-soft-tissue autografts and allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison study in a sheep model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:360–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fu FH (2008) The clock-face reference: simple but nonanatomic. Arthroscopy 24: 1433; author reply 1434Google Scholar
- 20.Jagodzinski M, Richter GM, Passler HH (2000) Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:11–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kaz R, Starman JS, Fu FH (2007) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision surgery. Arthroscopy 23: 1250, e1251–1253Google Scholar
- 33.Scheffler SU, Schmidt T, Gangey I, Dustmann M, Unterhauser F, Weiler A (2008) Fresh-frozen free-tendon allografts versus autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: delayed remodeling and inferior mechanical function during long-term healing in sheep. Arthroscopy 24:448–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.van Eck CF, Morse KR, Lesniak BP, Kropf EJ, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, Fu FH (2010) Does the lateral intercondylar ridge disappear in ACL deficient patients? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Epub ahead of print Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1038-z