Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 519–527

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study

  • Erhan Basad
  • Bernd Ishaque
  • Georg Bachmann
  • Henning Stürz
  • Jürgen Steinmeyer
Knee

Abstract

Cartilage defects occur in approximately 12% of the population and can result in significant function impairment and reduction in quality of life. Evidence for the variety of surgical treatments available is inconclusive. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with symptomatic cartilage defects treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI™ or microfracture (MF). Included patients were ≥18 and ≤50 years of age with symptomatic, post-traumatic, single, isolated chondral defects (4–10 cm2) and were randomised to receive MACI™ or MF. Patients were followed up 8–12, 22–26 and 50–54 weeks post-operatively for efficacy and safety evaluation. Outcome measures were the Tegner, Lysholm and ICRS scores. Sixty patients were included in a randomised study (40 MACI™, 20 MF). The difference between baseline and 24 months post-operatively for both treatment groups was significant for the Lysholm, Tegner, patient ICRS and surgeon ICRS scores (all P < 0.0001). However, MACI™ was significantly more effective over time (24 months versus baseline) than MF according to the Lysholm (P = 0.005), Tegner (P = 0.04), ICRS patient (P = 0.03) and ICRS surgeon (P = 0.02) scores. There were no safety issues related to MACI™ or MF during the study. MACI™ is superior to MF in the treatment of articular defects over 2 years. MACI™ and MF are complementary procedures, depending on the size of the defect and symptom recurrence. The MACI™ technique represents a significant advance over both first and second generation chondrocyte-based cartilage repair techniques for surgeons, patients, health care institutions and payers in terms of reproducibility, safety, intraoperative time, surgical simplicity and reduced invasiveness.

Keywords

Knee Cartilage Autologous transplantation Arthroscopic microfracture Matrix induced chondrocyte implantation (MACI) 

References

  1. 1.
    Abelow SP, Guillen P, Ramos T (2006) Arthroscopic technique for matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of large chondral defects in the knee and ankle. Oper Tech Orthop 16:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32:211–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachmann G, Basad E, Lommel D, Steinmeyer J (2004) MRI in the follow-up of matrix-supported autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACI™) and microfracture. Radiologe 44:773–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartlett W, Krishnan SP, Skinner JA, Carrington RWJ, Briggs TWR, Bentley G (2006) Collagen-covered versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a comparison of tourniquet times. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16:315–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartlett W, Skinner JA, Gooding CR, Carrington RW, Flanagan AM, Briggs TW, Bentley G (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B:640–645Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basad E, Stürz H, Steinmeyer J (2007) Treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee with autologous bone graft and chondrocyte transplantation: an overview together with our results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41(Suppl 2):79–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bates D, Maechler M (2008) Matrix: sparse and dense matrix classes and methods. R package version 0.999375-16. http://cran.r-project.org/
  8. 8.
    Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brunner E, Langer F (2000) Nonparametric analysis of ordered categorical data in designs with longitudinal observations and small sample sizes. Biom J 42(6):663–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Wang Y, English DR, Giles GG, Cicuttini FM (2008) The natural history of cartilage defects in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:337–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A (2006) A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee 13:203–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grana WA (2000) Healing of articular cartilage: a review. Am J Knee Surg 13:29–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hambly K, Bobic V, Wondrasch B, Van Assche D, Marlovits S (2006) Autologous chondrocyte implantation postoperative care and rehabilitation: science and practice. Am J Sports Med 34:1020–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hangody L, Vásárhelyi G, Hangody LR, Sükösd Z, Tibay G, Bartha L, Bodó G (2008) Autologous osteochondral grafting—technique and long-term results. Injury 39(Suppl 1):S32–S39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T, Muri R, Brittberg M (2002) Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18:730–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package (2000) The International Cartilage Repair Society web site: http://www.cartilage.org/_files/contentmanagement/ICRS_evaluation.pdf. Accessed 28th September 2009
  19. 19.
    Jagiello MJ, Rogers B, Briggs TWR (2007) Sequential outcome improvement following autologous chondrocyte implantation—7 year follow-up Podium presentation (no. 182) at the 2007 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 14th–18th February, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grøntvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, Roberts S, Solheim E, Strand T, Johansen O (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2105–2112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen T, Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Solheim E, Strand T, Roberts S, Isaksen V, Johansen O (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee: a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:455–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of the knee ligament results with special emphasis on the use of a scoring scale. J Am Sports Med 3:150–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Resinger C, Aldrian SM, Vécsei V, Trattnig S (2005) Early post-operative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:451–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Minas T, Gomoll AH, Rosenberger R, Royce RO, Bryant T (2009) Increased failure rate of autologous chondrocyte implantation after previous treatment with marrow stimulation techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:902–908 (epub 2009 Mar 4)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjögren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two to nine year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 374:212–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.r-project.org
  28. 28.
    Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Haspl M, Bohnsack M, Fortems Y, Vandekerckhove B, Almqvist KF, Claes T, Handelberg F, Lagae K, van der Bauwhede J, Vandenneucker H, Yang KG, Jelic M, Verdonk R, Veulemans N, Bellemans J, Luyten FP (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36:235–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sellards RA, Nho SJ, Cole BJ (2002) Chondral injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:134–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2002) Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. J Knee Surg 15:170–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ (1999) The microfracture technique in the management of complete cartilage defects in the knee joint. Orthopade 28:26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Venables WN, Ripley BD (2003) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-0387954578Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zheng MH, Willers C, Kirilak L, Yates P, Xu J, Wood D, Shimmin A (2007) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI™©): biological and histological assessment. Tissue Eng 13:737–746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erhan Basad
    • 1
  • Bernd Ishaque
    • 1
  • Georg Bachmann
    • 2
  • Henning Stürz
    • 1
  • Jürgen Steinmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinic and Polyclinic for Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospital Giessen-Marburg GmbHGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyKerckhoff ClinicBad NauheimGermany

Personalised recommendations