Advertisement

Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway

  • Robert A. Magnussen
  • Lars-Petter Granan
  • Warren R. Dunn
  • Annunziato Amendola
  • Jack T. Andrish
  • Robert Brophy
  • James L. Carey
  • David Flanigan
  • Laura J. Huston
  • Morgan Jones
  • Christopher C. Kaeding
  • Eric C. McCarty
  • Robert G. Marx
  • Matthew J. Matava
  • Richard D. Parker
  • Armando Vidal
  • Michelle Wolcott
  • Brian R. Wolf
  • Rick W. Wright
  • Kurt P. Spindler
  • Lars Engebretsen
Knee

Abstract

Data from large prospectively collected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) cohorts are being utilized to address clinical questions regarding ACL injury demographics and outcomes of ACL reconstruction. These data are affected by patient and injury factors as well as surgical factors associated with the site of data collection. The aim of this article is to compare primary ACL reconstruction data from patient cohorts in the United States and Norway, demonstrating the similarities and differences between two large cohorts. Primary ACL reconstruction data from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) in the United States and the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR) were compared to identify similarities and differences in patient demographics, activity at injury, preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), time to reconstruction, intraarticular pathology, and graft choice. Seven hundred and thirteen patients from the MOON cohort were compared with 4,928 patients from the NKLR. A higher percentage of males (NKLR 57%, MOON 52%; P < 0.01) and increased patient age (NKLR 27 years, MOON 23 years; P < 0.001) were noted in the NKLR population. The most common sports associated with injury in the MOON cohort were basketball (20%), soccer (17%), and American football (14%); while soccer (42%), handball (26%), and downhill skiing (10%) were most common in the NKLR. Median time to reconstruction was 2.4 (Interquartile range [IQR] 1.2–7.2) months in the MOON cohort and 7.9 (IQR 4.2–17.8) months in the NKLR cohort (P < 0.001). Both meniscal tears (MOON 65%, NKLR 48%; P < 0.001) and articular cartilage defects (MOON 46%, NKLR 26%; P < 0.001) were more common in the MOON cohort. Hamstring autografts (MOON 44%, NKLR 63%) and patellar tendon autografts (MOON 42%, NKLR 37%) were commonly utilized in both cohorts. Allografts were much more frequently utilized in the MOON cohort (MOON 13%, NKLR 0.04%; P < 0.001). Significant diversity in patient, injury, and surgical factors exist among large prospective cohorts collected in different locations. Surgeons should investigate and consider the characteristics of these cohorts when applying knowledge gleaned from these groups to their own patient populations.

Keywords

ACL Meniscus KOOS Epidemiology Articular cartilage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

MOON Acknowledgments This work was partially supported by the Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Research Fund, by a Grant from the NIH NIAMS #1 R01AR053684-01 A1 (Spindler—PI), by a Grant from the NIH #5 K23 AR052392-03 (Dunn—PI), and by unrestricted educational gifts from DonJoy and Smith & Nephew Endoscopy.

The authors thank the Research Coordinators at the MOON sites for their diligent assistance and cooperation, and Lynn S. Cain for editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

NKLR Acknowledgments The NKLR is financed by the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, which has been established through generous grants from the Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Culture, the Norwegian Olympic Committee & Confederation of Sport, and Norsk Tipping AS. In addition, the NKLR has been supported through a grant from the Norwegian Medical Association’s Fund for Quality Improvement. Lars-Petter Granan has been supported by the Medical Research Curriculum at the University of Oslo.

The authors wish to thank Kjersti Steindal, computer engineer, for extracting the data from the National Knee Ligament Registry; NKLR secretaries, Ruth Gunvor Wasmuth and Marianne Wiese; and the staff and colleagues of the participating orthopedic and surgical departments for their cooperation.

Conflict of interest statement

In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Norwegian Eastern Health Corporate, Royal Norwegian Ministry of Culture, Norwegian Olympic Committee and Confederation of Sport, Norsk Tipping AS, and Pfizer AS. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F, Simeone AJV, Zaccherotti G (1997) Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon: a 5–8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:138–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellabarba C, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr (1997) Patterns of meniscal injury in the anterior cruciate-deficient knee: a review of the literature. Am J Orthop 26:18–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eriksson E (2006) A European ACL register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Latterman C (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part II: operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granan LP, Bahr R, Lie SA, Engebretsen L (2009) Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery and risk of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears: a cohort study based on the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 37:955–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 36:308–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Granan LP, Engebretsen L, Bahr R (2004) Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Norway. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 124:928–930PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB (1995) Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:11–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB (1995) The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1543–1550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:44–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:117–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P (2002) The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):2–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marx RG, Connor J, Lyman S, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Kaeding C, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wright RW, Spindler KP (2005) Multirater agreement of arthroscopic grading of knee articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med 33:1654–1657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:213–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37:1434–1443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K, Kader D, Connolly C, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13 year review. Am J Sports Med 34:721–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2000) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Am J Sports Med 28:446–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spindler KP, McCarty EC, Warren TA, Devin C, Connor JT (2003) Prospective comparison of arthroscopic medial meniscal repair technique: inside-out suture versus entirely arthroscopic arrows. Am J Sports Med 31:929–934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tandogan RN, Taser O, Kayaalp A, Taskiran E, Pinar H, Alparslan B, Alturfan A (2004) Analysis of meniscal and chondral lesions accompanying anterior cruciate ligament tears: relationship with age, time from injury, and level of sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:262–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tegnander A, Olsen OE, Moholdt TT, Engebretsen L, Bahr R (2008) Injuries in Norwegian female elite soccer: a prospective one-season cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:194–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld J, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wolcott M, Wolf BR, Spindler KP (2007) Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med 35:1131–1134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu WH, Hackett T, Richmond JC (2002) Effect of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study. Am J Sports Med 30:845–850PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Magnussen
    • 1
  • Lars-Petter Granan
    • 2
  • Warren R. Dunn
    • 1
  • Annunziato Amendola
    • 3
  • Jack T. Andrish
    • 4
  • Robert Brophy
    • 5
  • James L. Carey
    • 1
  • David Flanigan
    • 6
  • Laura J. Huston
    • 1
  • Morgan Jones
    • 4
  • Christopher C. Kaeding
    • 6
  • Eric C. McCarty
    • 7
  • Robert G. Marx
    • 8
  • Matthew J. Matava
    • 5
  • Richard D. Parker
    • 4
  • Armando Vidal
    • 7
  • Michelle Wolcott
    • 7
  • Brian R. Wolf
    • 3
  • Rick W. Wright
    • 5
  • Kurt P. Spindler
    • 1
    • 10
  • Lars Engebretsen
    • 9
  1. 1.Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Oslo Sports Trauma Research CenterNorwegian School of Sport SciencesOsloNorway
  3. 3.University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  4. 4.Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  5. 5.Washington University at St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  6. 6.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  7. 7.University of ColoradoBoulder and DenverUSA
  8. 8.Hospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  9. 9.Orthopaedic CenterUllvaal University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloOsloNorway
  10. 10.Vanderbilt Sports MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations