Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 17, Issue 10, pp 1152–1158 | Cite as

Clinical value of regular passive ROM exercise by a physical therapist after total knee arthroplasty

  • Tae Kyun Kim
  • Kwan Kyu Park
  • Su Won Yoon
  • Sung Ju Kim
  • Chong Bum Chang
  • Sang Cheol Seong
Knee

Abstract

Regular passive ROM exercise (PROME) by a physical therapist is often incorporated in rehabilitation protocols after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This randomized, controlled trial examined whether or not the incorporation of PROME to a postoperative rehabilitation protocol would offer a better clinical outcome after TKA. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent bilateral TKAs staged 2 weeks apart received PROME for one knee and not for the other. The pain level (7D and 14D), patient’s preference (before discharge, 6M), maximum flexion (7D, 14D, 3M, 6M) and American Knee Society and WOMAC scores (6M) were determined in the knees with and without PROME and compared. There were no significant differences in the maximum flexion, pain level, patient’s preference, AKS scores and WOMAC scores. This study demonstrates that the incorporation of PROME does not offer additional clinical benefits to the patients after TKA. Our findings may suggest that encouraging patients to perform active ROM exercise would be a better option and that a physiotherapy session by a physical therapist can focus on more functional rehabilitation, such as preparing to return to daily activities.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Rehabilitation Passive ROM exercise 

References

  1. 1.
    Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, Ueo T, Nishijyo K, Ohnishi E (2000) The bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1626–1633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, Walker SA, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA (2004) A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:174–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bin SI, Nam TS (2007) Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohannon RW (2005) Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil 19:662–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang CB, Han I, Kim SJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2007) Association between radiological findings and symptoms at the patellofemoral joint in advanced knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1324–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen B, Zimmerman JR, Soulen L, DeLisa JA (2000) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG, Sporer SM (2006) Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:266–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denis M, Moffet H, Caron F, Ouellet D, Paquet J, Nolet L (2006) Effectiveness of continuous passive motion and conventional physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 86:174–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr (1990) Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han I, Chang CB, Choi JA, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK (2007) Is the degree of osteophyte formation associated with the symptoms and functions in the patellofemoral joint in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ (2005) The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JM, Moon MS (1995) Squatting following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 313:177–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1470–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kramer JF, Speechley M, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Vaz M (2003) Comparison of clinic- and home-based rehabilitation programs after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:225–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K (1996) Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:93–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T (2002) Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 17:59–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li G, Schule SL, Zayontz SJ, Maloney WJ, Rubash HE (2003) Improving flexion in total knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL (eds) The adult knee, vol 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1233–1244Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW, Kramer J, Vaz M (2000) Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:30–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahomed NN, Koo Seen Lin MJ, Levesque J, Lan S, Bogoch ER (2000) Determinants and outcomes of inpatient versus home based rehabilitation following elective hip and knee replacement. J Rheumatol 27:1753–1758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ, Hangen D, Goodman SB, Edworthy S, Bloch DA (1990) The influence of continuous passive motion on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:162–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Montgomery F, Eliasson M (1996) Continuous passive motion compared to active physical therapy after knee arthroplasty: similar hospitalization times in a randomized study of 68 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 67:7–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP (2001) Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park KK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK (2007) Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:604–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park KK, Shin KS, Chang CB, Kim SJ, Kim TK (2007) Functional disabilities and issues of concern in female Asian patients before TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:143–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pope RO, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW (1997) Continuous passive motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Does it offer any benefits? J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:914–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rajan RA, Pack Y, Jackson H, Gillies C, Asirvatham R (2004) No need for outpatient physiotherapy following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial of 120 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:71–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Dietrich T, Einhorn TA (2007) Safety of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1220–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ritter MA, Gandolf VS, Holston KS (1989) Continuous passive motion versus physical therapy in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 244:239–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY (2005) Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(10 Suppl):s1247–1250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sullivan MG, Heislein DM, Doherty RF, Fishbein R (2003) Rehabilitation principles after total knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL (eds) The adult knee, vol 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadephia, pp 455–463Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ververeli PA, Sutton DC, Hearn SL, Booth RE Jr, Hozack WJ, Rothman RR (1995) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of cost and benefits. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:208–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon MJ, Mathis KB (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:172–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angles F, Lopez-Jimenez F, Jessup DE (1998) Home continuous passive motion machine versus professional physical therapy following total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 13:784–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yashar AA, Venn-Watson E, Welsh T, Colwell CW Jr, Lotke P (1997) Continuous passive motion with accelerated flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:38–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tae Kyun Kim
    • 1
  • Kwan Kyu Park
    • 1
  • Su Won Yoon
    • 1
  • Sung Ju Kim
    • 2
  • Chong Bum Chang
    • 1
  • Sang Cheol Seong
    • 3
  1. 1.Joint Reconstruction CenterSeoul National University Bundang HospitalGyunggidoKorea
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations