Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 16, Issue 11, pp 1009–1016 | Cite as

Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts

  • Riitta Lautamies
  • Arsi Harilainen
  • Jyrki Kettunen
  • Jerker Sandelin
  • Urho M. Kujala
Knee

Abstract

Existing clinical studies have not proven which graft is to be preferred in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In recent years, bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendons have been the most frequently used graft types. Muscle strength deficit is one of the consequences after ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength and knee function 5 years after ACL reconstruction between the BPTB and the STG groups. The study group consisted of 288 patients (132 women, 156 men) with a unilateral ACL rupture who had received a BPTB (175 patients) or STG (113 patients) ACL reconstruction. Lower extremity concentric isokinetic peak extension and flexion torques were assessed at the angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Tegner activity level, the Lysholm knee and the Kujala patellofemoral scores were also collected. Isokinetic quadriceps peak torque (percentage of the contralateral side) was 3.9% higher in the STG group than in the BPTB group at the velocity of 60°/s and 3.2% higher at the velocity of 180°/s and the isokinetic hamstring peak torque 2% higher in the BPTB group than in the STG group at the velocity of 60°/s and 2.5% higher at the velocity of 180°/s. In both groups the subjects had weaker quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength in the injured extremity compared with the uninjured one. In the single-leg hop test (according to the IKDC recommendations) there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.040) between the groups. In the STG group, 68% of the patients had the single-leg hop ratio (injured vs. uninjured extremity) ≥90%, 31% of the patients 75–89% and 1% of the patients <75%, while in the BPTB group the corresponding percentages were 72, 21 and 7%. However, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome were found between the groups as determined by the IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee and Kujala patellofemoral scores.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction Hamstring tendon Patellar tendon Muscle strength 

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, Be Biase P (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–218. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200210 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A:2143–2155Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson A, Snyder R, Lipscomb A (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armour T, Forwell L, Litchfield R, Kirkley A, Amendola N, Fowler P (2004) Isokinetic evaluation of internal/external tibial rotation strength after the use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:1639–1643. doi: 10.1177/0363546504263405 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aune A, Holm I, Risberg M, Jensen H, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beard D, Anderson J, Davies S, Price A, Dodd C (2001) Hamstrings vs. patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 8:45–50. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00062-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, Renström P (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A:1503–1513Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 33:1579–1602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bizzini M, Gorelick M, Munzinger U, Drobny T (2006) Joint laxity and isokinetic muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon versus quadrupled hamstring autografts. Clin J Sport Med 16:4–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carter T, Edinger S (1999) Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 15:169–172. doi: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150161 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eastlack ME, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (1999) Laxity, instability and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:210–215. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199902000-00002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N, Köhler K, Karlsson J (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 31:19–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Löfgren AC, Bredenberg M, Westman I, Wredmark T (2001) A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:348–354. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.11685 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Olerud P, Wredmark T (2001) There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feller J, Webster K, Gavin B (2001) Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:260–266. doi: 10.1007/s001670100216 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harilainen A, Linko E, Sandelin J (2006) Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:517–528. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0059-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee 12:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.02.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2000) Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1472–1479 doi: 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00016
  20. 20.
    Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2007) Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft. Clin Biomech 22:543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jansson K, Linko E, Sandelin J, Harilainen A (2003) A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:12–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Järvelä T, Kannus P, Latvala K, Järvinen M (2002) Simple measurements in assessing muscle performance after an ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Med 23:196–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kannus P, Latvala K, Järvinen M (1987) Thigh muscle strengths in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Isokinetic and isometric long-term results. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 9:223–227Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keays S, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays A, Newcombe P (2001) Muscle strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis. Knee 8:229–234. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00099-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9:159–163. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80366-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laxdal G, Sernert N, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2007) A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:115–125. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0165-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Makihara Y, Nishino A, Fukubayashi T, Kanamori A (2006) Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:310–317. doi: 10.1007/s00167-005-0701-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marder R, Raskind J, Carroll M (1991) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 19:478–484. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900510 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mikkelsen C, Werner S, Eriksson E (2000) Closed kinetic chain alone compared to combined open and closed kinetic chain exercises for quadriceps strengthening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with respect to return to sports: a prospective matched follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:337–342. doi: 10.1007/s001670000143 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Hamada M, Shino K (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.32868 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Natri A, Järvinen M, Latvala K, Kannus P (1996) Isokinetic muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament surgery Long-term results and outcome predicting factors after primary surgery and late-phase reconstruction. Int J Sports Med 17:223–228. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972836 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Osteras H, Augestad LB, Tondel S (1998) Isokinetic muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:279–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Garfein RF (1989) Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 7:760–765. doi: 10.1177/036354658901700606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sekiya I, Muneta T, Ogiuchi T (1998) Significance of the single-legged hop test to the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee in relation to muscle strength and anterior laxity. Am J Sports Med 26:384–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seto J, Orofino A, Morrissey M, Medeiros J, Mason W (1988) Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 16:170–180. doi: 10.1177/036354658801600215 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shelbourne KD, Gray T (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two-to nine-year followup. Am J Sports Med 25:786–795. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500610 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Snyder-Mackler L, De Luca P, Williams P, Eastlack M, Bartolozzi A (1994) Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:555–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, Hikita A, Fukui N (2003) Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a detailed evaluation with comparison of single- and double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med 31:522–529. doi: 10.1177/31.4.522 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webster K, Feller J, Hameister K (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:86–91. doi: 10.1007/s001670100191 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR (1994) The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:60–73PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riitta Lautamies
    • 1
  • Arsi Harilainen
    • 2
  • Jyrki Kettunen
    • 3
  • Jerker Sandelin
    • 2
  • Urho M. Kujala
    • 4
  1. 1.Health centre of MiehikkäläMiehikkäläFinland
  2. 2.ORTON Orthopaedic HospitalInvalid FoundationHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.ORTON Research InstituteInvalid FoundationHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations