Advertisement

Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental

  • Graeme Philip HopperEmail author
  • William Joseph Leach
Sports Medicine

Abstract

Few studies have been published assessing patients sporting activity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Common concerns of patients undergoing TKA or UKA are whether they can continue with sporting activities after surgery. This study compares the sporting activity of TKA and UKA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 110 patients were surveyed by questionnaire. Seventy-six patients had undergone TKA and 34 patients had undergone UKA. They were assessed for their participation in low-impact sport preoperatively and postoperatively at a mean follow up of 21.6 ± 5.3 and 22.3 ± 7.8 months, respectively. Low-impact sports are those which a surgeon would expect patients to be able to participate in postoperatively. Data were separately analysed for older and younger patients and women and men, respectively. The results were as follows: before surgery, 55 of 76 patients in the TKA group participated in an average of 1.3 different sports and postoperatively, 35 of 76 patients participated in an average of 0.7 different sports. In the UKA group, 30 of 34 patients participated in an average of 1.5 different sports preoperatively and postoperatively, 29 of 34 patients participated in an average of 1.4 different sports. The return to sport rate was 96.7% in the UKA group and 63.6% in the TKA group. In the TKA group, the average frequency of sport preoperatively was 3.0 sessions per week (62.7 min) and postoperatively it decreased to 2.0 sessions per week (37.5 minutes). In the UKA group, the average frequency of sport preoperatively was 3.2 sessions per week (85.0 min) and postoperatively it increased to 3.4 sessions per week (92.1 min). The average time before resuming sport after surgery was 4.1 months in the TKA group and 3.6 months in the UKA group; 42.9% of patients in the TKA group and 24.1% of patients in the UKA group reported pain during sports after surgery; 80.3% of the patients in the TKA group and 88.2% of the patients in the UKA group felt that surgery had increased or maintained their sporting ability. Oxford knee scores decreased significantly one year after surgery in both the TKA group and the UKA group. In conclusion, the patients in our study had a significantly greater return to sport rate after UKA than patients who had undergone TKA. A large proportion of patients in the TKA group did not return to sport which their surgeon would have expected them to including golf and bowls. Patients in the UKA group also took part in more sporting sessions and for a longer period of time than patients in the TKA group. Moreover, patients undergoing UKA also returned to sport more quickly than patients undergoing TKA.

Keywords

Knee Arthroplasty Replacement Sports Questionnaires 

Notes

Acknowledgments

With grateful thanks to: all patients who showed their support by completing the questionnaire; Heather Scott and Deborah McGilveray for their contribution to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE, Gaston M, Brenkel IJ (2006) Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Results of a matched study. Clin Orthop 451:101–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradbury N, Borton D, Spoo G, Cross MJ (1998) Participation in sports after total knee replacement. Am J Sports Med 26:530–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13:296–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset E, Engesaeter L, Havelin L (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental knee replacement with cement—a comparison of failure mechanisms. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jahromi I, Walton NP, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL, Campbell DG (2004) Patient perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision. Int Orthop 28:286–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mallon WJ, Callaghan JJ (1993) Total knee arthroplasty in active golfers. J Arthroplasty 8:299–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGrory BJ, Stuart MJ, Sim FH (1995) Participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty: review of literature and survey of surgeon preferences. Mayo Clin Proc 70:342–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A, Goldhahn J, Von Knoch F, Preiss S, Munzinger U, Drobny T (2007) Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35:1688–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah N (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective randomized trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(5):862–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:54–60Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG (2006) Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19:112–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2003) Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty—early results of a matched-pair comparison. Singapore Med J 44(11):559–562PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsWestern InfirmaryGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations