Advertisement

In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction

  • Clayton G. Lane
  • Russell F. Warren
  • Fatima C. Stanford
  • Daniel Kendoff
  • Andrew D. PearleEmail author
Knee

Abstract

ACL insufficiency can be documented clinically with the pivot shift maneuver, but the specific pathologic kinematics of the pivot shift is difficult to quantify. Navigation provides an opportunity to analyze in vivo the motions that comprise the pivot shift and the kinematic changes that are inherent after ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that tibial rotation, anterior tibial translation (ATT), acceleration of posterior translation (APT) and the newly described angle of P, quantified during navigated pivot shift examination, correlate with clinical grading of the pivot shift phenomena. Navigation data from 12 patients who underwent navigated ACL surgery were retrospectively reviewed. A characteristic P-shaped track of motion is recorded by the navigation software during the pivot-shift examination. The “angle of P” was developed as a means characterizing this track of motion and was measured in all cases. The tibial rotation, maximum anterior tibial translation and acceleration of posterior translation during the pivot shift were also measured. The charts of these patients were reviewed to obtain information on the clinical grading of the pivot-shift before and after ACL reconstruction. Spearman correlation analysis was then used to identify significant correlations between clinical grade of the pivot shift and the angle of p measured with computer navigation. After reconstruction, the clinical grade of the pivot shift was zero in all patients. The tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and the angle of p also decreased. On analysis of 24 EUAs, 12 before reconstruction and 12 after, there was excellent and significant correlation between the clinical grade of pivot shift examination and the angle of P (R 2 = 0.97, p < 0.001). Only good correlation was noted between the clinical pivot shift and the rotation (R 2 = 0.77, p < 0.0001), maximum ATT (R 2 = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and APT (R 2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001). There was a stepwise increase of 6–7 mm of translation and 5–6° of rotation for each increasing grade of pivot shift. There were also increases in the angle of P and APT for each increasing grade of pivot. A decrease in tibial rotation, maximum ATT, APT and angle of p is detected by computer navigation with ACL reconstruction, correlating with clinical grading. Clinical quantification of the distinct elements of the pivot shift may allow for more accurate evaluation of different ACL reconstruction constructs. There is also potential for these variables to be measured intraoperatively and guide ACL reconstruction when computer navigation is employed.

Keywords

Pivot shift Anterior cruciate ligament Physical examination Navigation Computer assisted surgery 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

No professional or private funding was received for this study. There were no conflicts of interest of any author of our manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL (1988) The pivot shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clinical test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16(6):571–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(5):267–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull AM, Amis AA (1998) The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 5:141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colombet P, Robinson JFRCS, Christel P et al (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL Reconstruction. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukuda Y, Woo SL, Loh JC et al (2003) A quantitative analysis of valgus torque on the ACL: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 21(6):1107–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop (147):45–50Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V et al (2007) Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:89–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Rudy TW et al (2002) The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy 18(4):394–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan N, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (1990) Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 18(4):354–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK et al (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):629–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S et al (2007) Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop 454:54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kvist J (2004) Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med 34(4):269–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leitze Z, Losee RE, Jokl P et al (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop (436):229–236Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lie DT, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) Persistence of the mini pivot shift after anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 457:203–209Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF et al (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearle AD, Solomon DJ, Wanich T et al (2007) Reliability of navigated knee stability examination. Am J Sports Med 35(8):1315–1320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P et al (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34(4):542–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D et al (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Report. Clin Orthop Rel Res 454:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J et al (2002) The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(6):907–914PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clayton G. Lane
    • 1
  • Russell F. Warren
    • 2
  • Fatima C. Stanford
    • 2
  • Daniel Kendoff
    • 2
  • Andrew D. Pearle
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Alabama Orthopaedic ClinicMobileUSA
  2. 2.Orthopaedic DepartmentHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Computer Assisted Surgery CenterHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations