Open versus percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study
- 909 Downloads
There is no agreement on the ideal type of surgical management for Achilles tendon rupture. The present randomized prospective study was performed to compare outcome data of open and percutaneous repair in the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Forty consecutive patients with acute rupture of Achilles tendon were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive open (group A) or percutaneous repair with Tenolig® (group B). All patients followed the same rehabilitation protocol except for slight differences in the duration of immobilization. Follow-up included objective evaluation (at 4 and 12 months), subjective evaluation using the SF-12® questionnaire (at 24 months), and bilateral ultrasound scanning and isokinetic testing (at 12 months). The differences in the parameters evaluated clinically were not significant except for ankle circumference, which was significantly greater in group B. There were two minor complications in the open repair group and one case of failed repair in the percutaneous group. SF-12® questionnaire, ultrasound and isokinetic test data did not show significant differences between the groups. The present study demonstrates that the open and the percutaneous technique are both safe and effective in repairing the ruptured Achilles tendon and that both afford the same degree of restoration of clinical, ultrasound and isokinetic patterns. Medium-term results were substantially comparable. Percutaneous repair is performed on a day-surgery basis, it reduces cutaneous complications and operation times, and enables faster recovery, enhancing overall patient compliance. To us, these characteristics make it preferable to open repair in managing subcutaneous ruptures of Achilles tendon in non-professional sports practicing adults.
KeywordsAchilles tendon Tendon rupture Tendon repair Percutaneous repair Percutaneous treatment
The authors are grateful Dr S. Modena for reviewing the English. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.
- 2.Arner O, Lindholm A, Orell SR (1959) Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon. A study of 92 cases. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 239:1–51Google Scholar
- 4.Carden D, Noble J, Chalmers J et al (1987) Rupture of the calcaneus tendon: the early and late management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69-B:416–420Google Scholar
- 8.Coughlin MJ, Mann RA (2001) Patologie dei tendini. In: Verduci (ed) Chirurgia del piede e della caviglia, Roma, vol 218, pp 801–816Google Scholar
- 9.Del Ponte P, Potier L, de Poulpiquet P et al (1992) Treatment of subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon with percutaneous tenorraphy. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 78:404–407Google Scholar
- 15.Haggmark T, Liedberg H, Eriksson E, Wredmark T (1986) Calf muscle atrophy and muscle function after non-operative vs operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Orthopaedics 9:160–164Google Scholar
- 19.Lea R, Smith L (1972) Non-surgical treatment of tendo Achilles rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54-A:1398–1406Google Scholar
- 21.Maffulli N (1999) Rupture of the Achilles tendon. Current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81-A:1019–1036Google Scholar
- 22.Möller M, Kälebo P, Tidebrant G, Movin T, Karlsson J (2002) The ultrasonographic appearance of the ruptured Achilles tendon during healing: a longitudinal evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical treatment, with comparisons to MRI appearance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(1):49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Nistor L (1981) Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63-A:394–399Google Scholar
- 27.Rook MD (1996) Lesione dei tendini, dei vasi, dei nervi e della cute. In: Verduci (ed) Chirurgia del Piede, Roma, vol. 32, pp 497–501Google Scholar
- 32.Willis C, Washburn S, Caiozzo V, Prietto C (1986) Achilles tendon rupture: a review of literature comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment. Clin Orthop 207:156–163Google Scholar