Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 350–355

Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery

Knee

Abstract

We compared clinical [including maximal flexion and range of motion (ROM)] and radiographical outcomes of high-flex versus conventional implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after 1 year. We also analyzed the factors affecting postoperative ROM in high-flex implants. The high-flex group (n = 90) had an average maximal flexion of 129.8° (standard deviation (SD), 5.2°) significantly higher than the 124.3° (SD, 9.2°) of the conventional group (n = 90), especially for patients with less than 90° of knee flexion (< 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital for special surgery (HSS) score between the two groups. No knee developed osteolysis, aseptic loosening, or other complications. We found that, for high-flex implants, preoperative ROM had a significant effect on postoperative ROM.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty High-flex implants Maximal flexion Range of motion 

References

  1. 1.
    Alejandro L, Luis M, Roman C (1997) Preoperative factors influencing the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B:626–629Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr et al (1996) Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 331:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argenson JA, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD et al (2005) In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 38:277–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J et al (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the knee kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condyle offset. J Bone Joint Surg 84-B:50–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chew JTH, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD et al (1997) Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinetics among three different total knee designs. Clin Orthop 345:87–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delp SL, Kocmond JH, Stern SH (1995) Tradeoffs between motion and stability in posterior substituting knee arthroplasty design. J Biomech 28:1155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE et al (1998) In vivo anteriorposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty : a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 356:47–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB et al (1998) Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 3:748–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guoan L, Ephrat M, Peter GS et al (2004) Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:1721–1729Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haruo Kawamura, Robert B. Bourne (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ (2005) The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Insall JN, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis: a report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A:173–180Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH (1982) The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg 64-A:1317–1323Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB et al (1983) The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg 65-A:619–628Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Junji Y, Shin I, Masakazu N et al (2002) Hy-flex II total knee system and range of motion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A:1470–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettlekamp DB (1972) A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 52:34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D et al (2002) Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patient with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop 404:203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merrill AR, Ritter ED (1987) Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP (2001) Activities of daily living in non-western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR et al (2002) Knee joint functional range of motion prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured during flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 16:46–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ et al (2002) Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 20:881–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S et al (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1199–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritter MA, Campbell ED (1987) Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D (1985) Total condylar knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67-A:1006–1014Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stern SH, Insall JN (1990) Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg 72-A:1400–1404Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations