Advertisement

Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction

  • Camille NeeterEmail author
  • Alexander Gustavsson
  • Pia Thomeé
  • Jesper Augustsson
  • Roland Thomeé
  • Jon Karlsson
Knee

Abstract

A more sports-specific and detailed strength assessment has been advocated for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of lower extremity strength tests with high ability to discriminate between leg power development on the injured and uninjured sides in patients after ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Twenty-three patients were tested 6 months after ACL injury and 44 patients were tested 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 44 patients were operated on using a hamstrings graft and 20 patients were operated on using a patellar tendon graft. All the patients performed a test battery of three strength tests for each leg in a randomised order. The three strength tests were chosen to reflect quadriceps and hamstring muscular power in a knee-extension and a knee-flexion test (open kinetic chain) and lower-extremity muscular power in a leg-press test (closed kinetic chain). There was a higher sensitivity for the test battery to discriminate abnormal leg power compared with any of the three strength tests individually. Nine out of ten patients after ACL reconstruction and six out of ten of the patients after ACL injury exhibited abnormal leg power symmetry using the test battery. Thus, this test battery had high ability in terms of discriminating between the leg power performance on the injured and uninjured side, both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that a test battery consisting of a knee-extension, knee-flexion and leg-press muscle power test had high ability to determine deficits in leg power 6 months after ACL injury and reconstruction. Only a minority of the patients had restored leg muscle power. The clinical relevance is that the test battery may contribute to the decision-making process when deciding whether and when patients can safely return to strenuous physical activities after an ACL injury or reconstruction.

Keywords

Muscle power Knee extension Knee flexion Leg press Test battery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Centre for Research in Sports and The Local Research and Development Council for Gothenburg and Southern Bohuslän, Sweden. The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Sweden.

References

  1. 1.
    Fithian DC, Paxton LW, Goltz DH (2002) Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am 33:621–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roos H, Karlsson J (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament instability and reconstruction. Review of current trends in treatment. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:426–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC (2002) The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop 402:9–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murphy DF, Connolly DA, Beynnon BD (2003) Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 37:13–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parkkari J, Kujala UM, Kannus P (2001) Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work. Sports Med 31:985–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sapega AA (1990) Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1562–1574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Østerås H, Augestad LB, Tøndel S (1998) Isokinetic muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament construction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:279–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson JL, Lamb SE, Barker KL, Davies S, Dodd CA, Beard DJ (2002) Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 73:546–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arangio GA, Chen C, Kalady M, Reed JF III (1997) Thigh muscle size and strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26:238–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carter T, Edinger S (1999) Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 15:169–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ernst GP, Saliba E, Diduch DR, Hurwitz SR, Ball DW (2000) Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 80:251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2000) Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1472–1479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Newcombe P, Keays AC (2003) The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 21:231–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewek M, Rudolph K, Axe M, Snyder-Mackler L (2002) The effect of insufficient quadriceps strength on gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech 17:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mattacola CG, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM, Gieck JH, Saliba EN, McCue FC (2002) Strength, functional outcome, and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train 37:262–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfeifer K, Banzer W (1999) Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 9:19–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Risberg MA, Holm I, Tjomsland O, Ljunggren E, Ekeland A (1999) Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:400–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Urbach D, Nebelung W, Becker R, Awiszus F (2001) Effects of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris: a prospective twitch interpolation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1104–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wojtys EM, Huston LJ (2000) Longitudinal effects of anterior cruciate ligament injury and patellar tendon autograft reconstruction on neuromuscular performance. Am J Sports Med 28:336–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, Huebert D (1995) Effects of an accelerated rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with combined semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and a ligament augmentation device. Am J Sports Med 23:588–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1992) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 15:256–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Carlo M, Shelbourne KD, Oneacre K (1999) Rehabilitation program for both knees when the contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft is used for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:144–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howell S, Taylor M (1996) Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:814–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop 255:204–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eastlack ME, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (1999) Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:210–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:76–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J (1986) A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 14:156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu-Ambrose T, Taunton JE, MacIntyre D, McConkey P, Khan KM (2003) The effects of proprioceptive or strength training on the neuromuscular function of the ACL reconstructed knee: a randomized clinical trail. Scand J Med Sci Sports 13:115–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petschnig R, Baron R, Albrecht M (1998) The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:23–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ross MD, Irrgang JJ, Denegar CR, McCloy CM, Unangst ET (2002) The relationship between participation restrictions and selected clinical measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:10–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR (1994) The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:60–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Östenberg A, Roos E, Ekdahl C, Roos H (1998) Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:257–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Greenberger H, Paterno M (1995) Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 22:202–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG (1997) Effects of rest interval on isokinetic strength and functional performance after short-term high intensity training. Br J Sports Med 31:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG (1997) Relation between open and closed kinematic chain assessment of knee strength and functional performance. Clin J Sport Med 7:11–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dudley GA, Stevenson SW (2003) Use of electrical stimulation in strength and power training. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 426–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Häkkinen K (2003) Ageing and neuromuscular adaptation to strength training. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knuttgen HG, Komi PV (2003) Basic considerations for exercise. In: Komi PV (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley GA, Dooly C, Feigenbaum MS, Fleck SJ, Franklin B, Fry AC, Hoffman JR, Newton RU, Potteiger J, Stone MH, Ratamess NA, Triplett-McBride T (2002) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:364–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Augustsson J, Thomeé R (2000) Ability of closed and open kinetic chain tests of muscular strength to assess functional performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:164–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Salem GJ, Salinas R, Harding FV (2003) Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1211–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grimby G (1986) Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Sand Suppl 711:233–237Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Risberg MA, Holm I, Ekeland A (1995) Reliability of functional knee tests in normal athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 5:24–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 410–411Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, Wright KC, Baxter TL, Patterson R, Stradel L (1987) Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:454–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wilk KE (1990) Dynamic muscle strength testing. In: Amundsen LR (ed) Muscle strength testing: instrumented and non-instrumented systems. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 134–135Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Augustsson J, Esko A, Thomeé R, Svantesson U (1998) Weight training of the thigh muscles using closed vs. open kinetic chain exercises: a comparison of performance enhancement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sleivert G, Backus R, Wenger H (1995) The influence of a strength-sprint training sequence on multi-joint power output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12:1655–1665Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wilson GJ, Newton R, Murphy AJ, Humphries B (1993) The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:1279–1286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Osternig LR (1986) Isokinetic dynamometry: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 14:45–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Petrella JK, Kim JS, Tuggle SC, Hall SR, Bamman MM (2004) Age differences in knee extension power, contractile velocity, and fatigability. J Appl Physiol 98:211–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Lindén C, Folkesson M, Tranberg R, Karlsson J (2005) Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports (Online publication date: 16-Feb-2005)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Hörnstedt P, Lindblom J, Karlsson J, Grimby G (2003) Effect of pre-exhaustion exercise on lower-extremity muscle activation during a leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 17:411–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Itoh H, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Ichihashi N, Mizuno K (1998) Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:241–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pantano KJ, Irrgang JJ, Burdett R, Delitto A, Harner C, Fu FH (2000) A pilot study on the relationship between physical impairment and activity restriction in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Östenberg A, Roos H (2000) Injury risk factors in female European football. A prospective study of 123 players during one season. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:279–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Beard DJ, Anderson JL, Davies S, Price AJ, Dodd CA (2001) Hamstrings vs. patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 8:45–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Feller JA, Webster KE, Gavin B (2001) Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:260–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shelbourne KD, Nitz PA (1991) The O’Donoghue triad revisited. Combined knee injuries involving anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament tears. Am J Sports Med 19:474–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rudroff T (2003) Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1486–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 32:1986–1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camille Neeter
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alexander Gustavsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pia Thomeé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jesper Augustsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roland Thomeé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jon Karlsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lundberg Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University HospitalGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Sportrehab–Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine ClinicGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations