Mechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw with a small diameter: significance of graft/bone tunnel cross-sectional area ratio

  • Akio Matsumoto
  • Shinichi Yoshiya
  • Hirotsugu Muratsu
  • Nobuzo Matsui
  • Masayoshi Yagi
  • Ryosuke Kuroda
  • Masahiro Kurosaka
Knee

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mechanical properties of a graft fixation using a small diameter soft tissue interference screw and analyze the factors affecting the fixation strength. Forty porcine knees were used. A bone tunnel, either 4.5 mm (n=40) or 5.0 mm (n=40) in diameter, was created in the bone block obtained from the proximal tibia or the distal femur. A patella–patellar tendon specimen with varied width was harvested, and the distal end of the patellar tendon was fixed within the bone tunnel using a small diameter soft tissue interference screw (4×15 mm). Then, the patella–patellar tendon-bone block complex was loaded until failure occurred and the maximum load was measured. As potential influential factors on the fixation strength, the insertion torque, bone mineral density of the bone block, and graft/tunnel cross-sectional area ratio (GTR) of each specimen were calculated. A significant correlation between the maximum failure load and the insertion torque was demonstrated. The quadratic regression analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the failure load and the GTR. Optimal GTR for achieving high fixation strength was approximately 80%. When used in appropriate conditions, the mean failure load was 177 N for the 4.5 mm screw and 180 N for the 5 mm screw. The use of a small diameter interference screw for the fixation of a tendon graft to a bone is clinically feasible. Our research showed that the selection of appropriate fitting conditions is an important factor for optimizing the properties of the fixation.

Keywords

Ligament reconstruction Interference screw Cross-sectional area Insertion torque Failure load 

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, et al (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad CS, Lee TQ, Elattrache NS (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of a new ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique with interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med 31:332–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aune AK, Ekeland A, Cawley PW (1998) Interference screw fixation of hamstring vs patellar tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:99–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brand JC Jr, Pienkowski D, Steenlage E, et al (2000) Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 28:705–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brand J Jr, Weiler A, Caborn DNM, et al (2000) Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:761–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, et al (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, et al (2001) A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, et al (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, et al (1997) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: Evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 13:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magen HE, Howell SM, Hull ML (1999) Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med 27:35–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagarkatti DG, McKeon BP, Donahue BS, et al (2001) Mechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw in free tendon anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Am J Sports Med 29:67–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, et al (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:344–352Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Numazaki H, Tohyama H, Nakano H, et al (2002) The effect of initial graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the mechanical behaviors of the femur–graft–tibia complex during cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 30:800–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Neill DB (1996) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:803–813Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Otelo AL, Hutcheson L (1993) A comparison of the double semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 9:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rupp S, Georg T, Gauss C, et al (2002) Fatigue testing of suture anchors. Am J Sports Med 30:239–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Selby JB, Johnson DL, Hester P, et al (2001) Effect of screw length on bioabsorbable interference screw fixation in a tibial bone tunnel. Am J Sports Med 29:614–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steenlage E, Brand JC Jr, Johnson DL, et al (2002) Correlation of bone tunnel diameter with quadrupled hamstring graft fixation strength using a biodegradable interference screw. Arthroscopy 18:901–907Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsuda E, Fukuda Y, Loh JC, et al (2002) The effect of soft-tissue graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on graft–tunnel motion under anterior tibial loading. Arthroscopy 18:960–967Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Siepe CJ, et al (2000) The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation. Am J Sports Med 28:356–359PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akio Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Shinichi Yoshiya
    • 1
  • Hirotsugu Muratsu
    • 1
  • Nobuzo Matsui
    • 1
  • Masayoshi Yagi
    • 2
  • Ryosuke Kuroda
    • 1
  • Masahiro Kurosaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryShin-Suma HospitalKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations