Advertisement

Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 7–23 | Cite as

The effect of information and communication technologies on creativity in collaborative design

  • Vicente ChulviEmail author
  • Elena Mulet
  • Francisco Felip
  • Carlos García-García
Original Paper

Abstract

This study compares the degree of creativity of forty-two conceptual designs proposed as solutions to two innovative design problems developed in face-to-face and virtual collaborative environments. The solutions obtained were evaluated by three experts applying the Moss metric, which considers the level of usefulness and the level of unusualness. The average values and the trends of the data were obtained, and an analysis of the variance was also performed to determine whether the environment influences the degree of creativity. The results show that it cannot be proved that the level of creativity is influenced by working face-to-face or virtually, that is, whether information and communication technologies are used or not has no effect on the final result.

Keywords

Collaborative design Conceptual design Creativity and innovation Design groups Information and communication technologies 

References

  1. Adenauer J, Israel JH, Stark R (2013) Virtual reality technologies for creative design. In: CIRP Design 2012. Springer, London, pp 125–135Google Scholar
  2. Andres HP (2002) A comparison of face-to-face and virtual software development teams. Team Perform Manag 8(1/2):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardaiz-Villanueva O, Nicuesa-Chacón X, Brene-Artazcoz O, de Acedo S, Lizarraga ML, de Acedo S, Baquedano MT (2011) Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning. Comput Educ 56(3):700–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atman CJ, Cardella ME, Turns J, Adams R (2005) Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study. Des Stud 26(4):325–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chulvi V, Mulet E, Gonzalez-Cruz MC (2012a) Medida de la creatividad en productos: Métricas y objetividad. Dyna 87(1):80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chulvi V, Mulet E, Chakrabarti A, López-Mesa B, González-Cruz C (2012b) Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. J Eng Des 23(4):241–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chulvi V, Sonseca Á, Mulet E, Chakrabarti A (2012c) Assessment of the relationships among design methods, design activities, and creativity. J Mech Des 134(11):111004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chulvi V, González-Cruz MC, Mulet E, Aguilar-Zambrano J (2013) Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Res Eng Des 24(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Pillis E, Furumo K (2007) Virtual vs. face-to-face teams: deadbeats, deserters, and other considerations. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: forty four years of computer personnel research—achievements, challenges and the future (SIGMIS CPR ‘06). ACM, New York, pp 318–320Google Scholar
  10. Flowers J (2001) Online learning needs in technology education. J Technol Educ 13(1):17–30Google Scholar
  11. Grabska E (2012) Towards a formal model of visual design aided by computer. In: Hippe ZS, Kulikowski JL, Mroczek T (eds) Anonymous human–computer systems interaction: backgrounds and applications 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 135–147Google Scholar
  12. Groover M, Zimmers E (1983) CAD/CAM: computer-aided design and manufacturing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  13. Gundy A (1981) Techniques of structured problem solving. Litton Educational Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard TJ, Culle SJ, Dekoninck E (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jezernik A, Hren G (2003) A solution to integrate computer-aided design (CAD) and virtual reality (VR) databases in design and manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22(11–12):768–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones JC (1980) Design methods: seeds of human futures. 1980 edGoogle Scholar
  17. Justel D, Arriaga E, Vidal R, Val E (2006) Diseño de un método para la evaluación del potencial innovador de un diseño conceptual. Proceedings of the X Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos, Valencia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  18. Knapp ML, Hall JA (2009) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Wadsworth Publishing Company, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  19. Kratzer J, Leenders RTA, Van Engelen JM (2006) Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation 26(1):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kudrowitz BM, Wallace D (2012) Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. J Eng Des 24(2):120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leenders RTA, Van Engelen JM, Kratzer J (2003) Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. J Eng Technol Manage 20(1):69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez-Mesa B, Mulet E, Vidal R, Thompson G (2011) Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. J Eng Des 22(1):31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacGregor SP, Torres-Coronas T (2007) Higher creativity for virtual teams: developing platforms for co-creation. IGI Global, PennsylvaniaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael KY (2001) The effect of a computer simulation activity versus a hands-on activity on product creativity in technology education. J Technol Educ 13(1):31–43 Google Scholar
  25. Moss J (1966) Measuring creative abilities in junior high school industrial arts. American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, EncinoGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulet E, Escamilla N, Chulvi V, Garcia-Garcia C, Felip F, Galán J (2013) Analysis of students opinion about a creative design experience by means of virtual synchronous teams. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering and product design education, Dublin, Ireland 5th–6th September 2013, p 126Google Scholar
  27. Ocker RJ (2005) Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: a qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 48(1):22–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Quin K, Besemer SP (1989) The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creat Res J 2(4):267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rahman N, Cheng R, Bayerl PS (2012) Synchronous versus asynchronous manipulation of 2D-objects in distributed design collaborations: implications for the support of distributed team processes. Des Stud 34(3):406–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Regli WC (1997) Internet-enabled computer aided design. IEEE Internet Comput 1(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivera J, Vidal R, Chulvi V, Lloveras J (2010) La transmisión visual de la información como estímulo cognitivo de los procesos creativos. Anales de Psicología 26(2):226–237Google Scholar
  32. Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2008) Studying engineering design creativity-developing a common definition and associated measures. Springer, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2014) A. Ideas generated in conceptual design and their effects on creativity. Res Eng Des 25(3):185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seichter H (2003) Augmented reality aided design. Int J Archit Comput 1(4):449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shah JJ, Smith SM, Vargas-Hernandez N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shigeki A, Zafer B (2008) Our content: generative montage methods for multimedia data. Des Stud 29(6):572–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smyth PS (2010) Planning purposeful imaginative activities in creative contexts for children’s literacy. Doctoral dissertation, Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Stricker DR (2008) Perceptions of creativity in art, music and technology education. ProQuestGoogle Scholar
  39. Tang H, Lee Y, Gero J (2011) Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: a protocol study using the function–behaviour–structure coding scheme. Des Stud 32(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson G, Lordan M (1999) A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 213(1):17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van der Lugt R (2002) Functions of sketching in design idea generation meetings. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity and cognition. ACM, pp 72–79Google Scholar
  42. Warkentin M, Sayeed L, Hightower R (1997) Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decis Sci 28(4):975–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu J, Krizan S, Ishii K (1993) Computer-aided design for manufacturing process selection. J Intell Manuf 4(3):199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicente Chulvi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena Mulet
    • 1
  • Francisco Felip
    • 2
  • Carlos García-García
    • 2
  1. 1.Dep. d’Enginyería Mecànica i ConstruccióUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain
  2. 2.Dep. d’Enginyeria de Sistemes Industrials i DissenyUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations