Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 125–139

Transfer of knowledge from the service phase: a case study from the oil industry

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the knowledge generated during the later phases of the life cycle of a complex customised product and understand how this knowledge is transferred between projects and between different user groups. A series of four identical rigs for offshore drilling was selected as a case study, and the transfer of knowledge between the first two rigs was explored through two sets of interviews with the rig operators and the project management team. The expected knowledge transfer strategies that emerged from the first set of interviews were analysed and compared with the actual transfer mechanisms identified in the second set of interviews, and similarities and differences were investigated. It was found that the transfer of knowledge primarily occurred within the individual phases of the product’s life cycle, and there was poor transfer across the different phases.

Keywords

Product life cycle management Design knowledge management Information management Service One-off machinery and oil industry 

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16(1):3–9Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed S (2000) Understanding use and reuse of experience in engineering design. Dissertation, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed S (2005) Encouraging reuse of design knowledge: a method to index knowledge. Des Stud 26(6):565–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed S, Wallace K, Blessing L (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Design 14(1):1–11Google Scholar
  5. Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25(1):107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organ Sci 14(3):312–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracewell RH, Ahmed S, Wallace KM (2004) DRed and design folders: a way of capturing, storing and passing on, knowledge generated during design projects: DETC2004-57165. Design automation conference, ASME, Salt Lake City, UtahGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci 15(5):555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter DE, Baker BS (1992) Concurrent engineering: the product development environment for the 1990s. Reading. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding L, Davies D, McMahon CA (2008) Sharing information throughout product lifecycle via markup of product models, ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, August 3–6 2008. Brooklyn, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Earl M (2001) Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. J Manage Inf Syst 18(1):215–233Google Scholar
  13. Easterby-Smith M, Prieto IM (2008) Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrating role of learning? Br J Manage 19:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giess MD, Wild PJ, McMahon CA (2008) The generation of faceted classification schemes for use in the organisation of engineering design documents. Int J Inf Manage 28(5):379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv Bus Rev 77(2):106–116Google Scholar
  16. Jagtap S (2008) Capture and structure of in-service information for engineering designers. Dissertation, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Jagtap S, Johnson A, Aurisicchio M, Wallace K (2007) In-service information required by engineering designers, 2007, ICED’07 16th international conference on engineering design, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Khadilkar DV, Stauffer LA (1996) An experimental evaluation of design information reuse during conceptual design. J Eng Des 7(4):331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3(3):383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMahon C, Lowe A, Culley S (2004) Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification. J Eng Des 15(4):307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev 69(6):96–104Google Scholar
  23. Pan S, Scarbrough H (1999) Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study of Buckman Labs. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 11(3):359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Prusak L (1997) Knowledge in organisations. Butterworth-Heinemann, NewtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowley J (2007) The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J Inf Sci 33(2):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tribelsky E, Sacks R (2010) Measuring information flow in the detailed design of construction projects. Res Eng Design 21(3):189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Von Krogh G, Nonaka I, Aben M (2001) Making the most of your company’s knowledge: a strategic framework. Long Range Plann 34(4):421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallace KM, Ahmed S, Bracewell RH (2005) Engineering knowledge management. In: Clarkson J, Eckert C (eds) Design process improvement—a review of current practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 326–343Google Scholar
  30. Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wimalasiri V, Beesley N, Cheyne AJT, Daniels KJ (2008) Social construction of the aetiology of designer error in the UK oil and gas industry: a stakeholder perspective. J Eng Des 21(1):49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wong SC, Crowder RM, Wills GB, Shadbolt NR (2008) Knowledge transfer: from maintenance to engine design. J Comput Inf Sci Eng (Transactions of the ASME), 8(1)Google Scholar
  33. Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publication, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  34. Zack MH (1999) Managing codified knowledge (cover story). Sloan Manage Rev 40(4):45–58Google Scholar
  35. Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organ Sci 6(1):76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Engineering, Section of Engineering Design and Product DevelopmentTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations