Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 263–274 | Cite as

The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation

Original Paper


Creative ideas are essential to original concept generation and ultimately innovation. But where and when do these vital creative ideas occur during product innovation and more importantly how can they be influenced? The following paper describes an industrially based study of several innovation projects following the actual processes of professional designers. Some ideas from the early brainstorm can be traced all the way through to concepts that are selected at the company’s stage-gate. Those early ideas are marked as ‘appropriate’ which provides an objective evaluation of the influence of any prescribed creative stimuli being used during the brainstorm sessions in relation to the output of the innovation process. The results showed that the frequency of idea production remained roughly constant during the first 30 min but steadily reduced after this period. However, the number of ‘appropriate’ ideas decreased rapidly, where 75% of the appropriate ideas in the first 30 min had been expressed after just 15 min. By introducing various forms of stimuli to the groups, the frequency of idea generation was maintained and in many cases increased. The stimuli were also shown to help generate more appropriate ideas which were included within concepts proposed at the stage-gate.


Design Creativity Idea generation Stimuli Brainstorming Industry 



The work reported in this paper has been undertaken as part of the EPSRC Innovative Design and Manufacturing Research Centre at The University of Bath (grant reference EP/E00184X/1).


  1. Adair JG, Sharpe D, Huynh CL (1990) The placebo control group: an analysis of its effectiveness in educational research. Journal of Experimental Education 59(1):p67–p86Google Scholar
  2. Altshuller GS (1999) The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MassGoogle Scholar
  3. Benami O, Jin Y (2002) Creative stimulation in engineering design. DETC2002/DTM-34023, ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference. Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. BS7000 (2008) Design management systems part 2. Guide to managing the design of manufactured products. British Standards. London, BSI. BS7000-2:2008Google Scholar
  5. Cox G (2005) Cox review of creativity in business: building on the UK’s strengths. Independent reviews, from
  6. Faure C (2004) Beyond brainstorming: effects of different group procedures on selection of ideas and satisfaction with the process. J Creat Behav 38(1):13–34Google Scholar
  7. Gero JS (1996) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowl-Based syst 9(7):435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gero JS (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25(4):373–391Google Scholar
  9. Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) C-K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Design 19:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helquist HJ, Santanen EL, Kruse J (2007). Participant-driven GSS: quality of brainstorming and allocation of participant resources. 40th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE ComputerGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard TJ (2008) Information Management for Creative Stimuli in Engineering Design. Mechanical Engineering. University of Bath, Bath, p 171Google Scholar
  12. Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck EA (2006). Information as an input into the creative process. 9th International design conference DESIGN 06, DubrovnikGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck EA (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180Google Scholar
  14. Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck EA (2010). Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. J Eng Design. doi: 10.1080/09544821003598573
  15. Isaksen SG, Gaulin JP (2005) A reexamination of brainstorming research: implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly 49(4):315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones E, Stanton NA, Harrison D (2001) Applying structured methods to eco-innovation. An evaluation of the product ideas tree diagram. Des Stud 22(6):519–542Google Scholar
  17. Kim Y, Jin S, Lee H (2005) Dual protocol analysis based on design information and design process: a case study. Studying designers ‘05. Key centre of design computing and cognition, University of SydneyGoogle Scholar
  18. Kristensson P, Norlander T (2003) The creative product and the creative processes in virtual environments. Creat Innov Manage 12(1):32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liikkanen LA, Perttula M (2006) Contextual cueing and verbal stimuli in design idea generation. In: Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition '06. Springer, Eindhoven, pp 619–631Google Scholar
  20. Mak TW, Shu LH (2008) Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation. Res Eng Design 19:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massetti B (1996) An empirical examination of the value of creativity support systems on idea generation. MIS Quarterly 20(1):83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAdams DA, Wood KL (2002) A quantitative similarity metric for design-by-analogy. J Mech Des 124:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulet E, Vidal R (2008) Heuristic guidelines to support conceptual design. Res Eng Design 19:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Napier N, Nilsson M (2006) The development of creative capabilities in and out of creative organizations: three case studies. Creat Innov Manage 15(3):268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2002) Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: exposure effects in an idea generation task. J Exp Soc Psychol 38(16):535–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Osborn AF (1953) Applied imagination; principles and procedures of creative thinking. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Perttula M, Sipila P (2007) The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. J Eng Des 18(1):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sainsbury D (2007) Sainsbury Review of Science and Innovation. Independent reviews. H. Treasury. HM Treasury: Article, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Shah J, Vargas-Hernandez N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134Google Scholar
  30. Thagard P (1997). Medical analogies: why and how? Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Erlbaum, MahwayGoogle Scholar
  31. Wierenga B (1998) The dependent variable in research into the effects of creativity support systems: quality and quantity of ideas. MIS Quarterly 22(1):89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu QL, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2006) Function-based design synthesis approach to design reuse. Res Eng Design 17:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Howard
    • 1
  • E. A. Dekoninck
    • 1
  • S. J. Culley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations