Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 153–171 | Cite as

Planning development processes for complex products

Original Paper

Abstract

Efficient planning of design processes is of critical importance to meet tight deadlines and budgets; and the development of process planning tools is a lively research area. This paper describes current planning practice in industry and the challenges associated with it. In industry, a multitude of plans are used in parallel each focussing on a different aspect. The units of planning and their resulting plans roughly fall into product plans considering cost, bill of materials and procurement considerations; process plans including different milestone, lead-times, task and activity plans; and quality plans. Over the course of a project, the same plan can serve as a prescriptive plan defining steps in the process, a target plan against which process is measured, and a record of the process. This paper argues that organisations work because individuals use more than one plan and have a tacit understanding of the relationships between these plans. Variations between different companies are discussed before the paper concludes with a reflection on implication for planning support.

Keywords

Process planning Empirical studies Complex engineering processes 

References

  1. Adler P, Mandelbaum A, Nguyen V, Schwerer E (1995) From project to process management: an empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Manage Sci 41(3):458–484MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APQP (1994) Advanced product quality planning & control plan. Automotive Industry Action Group, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  3. Asimow M (1962) Introduction to design. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin S, Baldwin A, Li B, Waskett P (2000) Application of the analytical design planning technique to construction project management. Proj Manage J 31(2):48–59Google Scholar
  5. Bohn R (2000) Stop fighting fires. Harvard Business Review, July–August, pp 82–91Google Scholar
  6. Browing T, Ramasesh R (2007) Survey of activity network-based process models. Prod Oper Manage 16(2):217–240Google Scholar
  7. Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48(3):292–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucciarelli L (1998) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Calinescu A, Efstathiou J, Sivadasan S, Schirn J, Huaccho Huatuco L (2000) Complexity in manufacturing: an information theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the international conference on complexity and complex systems in industry, Warwick University, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarkson J, Hamilton J (2000) Signposting: a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Res Eng Design 12:18–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper R (1995) Developing new products on time, in time. Res Technol Manage 38(5):49–57Google Scholar
  13. De Weck O, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2007) Classification of uncertainty for early product and system design. In: Proceedings of ICED’07, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. Deshmukh A, Talavage J, Barash M (1998) Complexity in manufacturing systems. IIE Trans 30:645–655Google Scholar
  15. Dolan A, Aldous J (1993) Networks and algorithms: an introductory approach. Wiley, Chichester, UKMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Earl CF, Eckert CM, Johnson JH (2001) ‘Complexity of planning in design’ in 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC'01), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, DETC2001/DTM-21697Google Scholar
  17. Earl C, Johnson J, Eckert C (2005) Complexity. In: Clarkson J, Eckert CM (eds) Design process improvement. Springer–Verlag, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Eckert C, Clarkson J (2004) If only I knew what you were going to do: communication and planning in large organizations. In: Tichkiewitch S, Brissaud D (eds) Methods and tools for co-operative and integrated design. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Eckert C, Clarkson PJ, Zanker W (2004) Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Res Eng Design 15(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eger T, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2005) The role of design freeze during product development. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering design. The Design Society, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer L (ed) (2005) Workflow Handbook 2005. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Flanagan, T (2006) Supporting design planning through process model simulation, PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  23. Flanagan T, Keller R, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2005) Robust scheduling of design tasks using simulation. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering design. The Design Society, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  24. Flanagan T, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2007) Externalising tacit overview knowledge model-based approach to supporting design teams. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manufng 21(3):151Google Scholar
  25. Frizelle G, Woodcock E (1995) Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manage 15(5):26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giere R (1999) Science without laws. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Goulding C (2002) Grounded theory, a practical guide for management, business and market researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. ISBN:0-7619-6683-8Google Scholar
  28. Hastings D, McManus H (2004) A Framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems. MIT Engineering Systems Symposium, March 2004Google Scholar
  29. Hoyle D (1996) ISO9000 quality systems auditor’s handbook. Butterworth, HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt D (1996) Process mapping: how to reengineer your business processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarratt T, Eckert C, Clarkson J, Stacey MK (2004) Providing an overview during the design of complex products: the development of a product linkage modelling method. In: Gero JS (ed) Proceedings of design computation and cognition ’04. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 239–258Google Scholar
  32. Jaynes E (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106:620–630CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirchmer M (2008) High performance through process excellence: from strategy to operations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Laborie P (2003) Algorithms for propagating resource constraints in AI planning and scheduling: existing approaches and new results. Artif Intell 143:151–188MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawson B (1980) How designers think. The Architectural Press Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. March L (1976) The logic of design and the question of value. In: Architecture of form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–40 (Reprinted as logic of design. In: Cross N (1984) (ed) Developments in design methodology. Wiley, Chichester)Google Scholar
  37. O’Donovan B (2004) Modelling and simulation of engineering design processes. PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Pande P, Holpp L (2001) What is six sigma?. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. PMI Standards Committee (2000) A project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Project Management InstituteGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997) Deciding between sequential and concurrent tasks in engineering design. Concurr Eng 6(1):15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stacey M, Eckert C (1999) An ethnographic methodology for design process analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on engineering design. Technical University of Munich, Munich, pp 1565–1570Google Scholar
  42. Stacey M, Eckert C (in press) Reshaping the box: creative designing as constraint management. Int J Prod DevGoogle Scholar
  43. Star S (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: heterogeneous problem-solving, boundary objects, and distributed artificial intelligence. In: Gasser L, Huhns M (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence 2. Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA, pp 37–54Google Scholar
  44. Suh N (1990) Principles of design. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Tribus M (1969) Rational descriptions, decisions and designs. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wynn C (2007) Model-based approaches to support process improvement in complex product development. PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  47. Wynn D, Clarkson PJ (2005) Models of designing. In: Clarkson PJ, Eckert CM (eds) Design process improvement. Springer, UKGoogle Scholar
  48. Wynn D, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2005) Addressing uncertainty in design planning and modeling: a case study of complex aerospace design 17th design theory and methodology conference. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ASME design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference. American society of mechanical engineers, Long Beach, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  49. Wynn D, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2007) Modelling iteration in engineering design. In: Processing of 16th international conference on engineering design (ICED’07), Paris, France, pp 693–694Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Design Group, DDEMThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Engineering Design Centre, Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations