Turbulence structure in a diabatically heated forest canopy composed of fractal Pythagoras trees

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

We investigate the turbulent flow through a heterogeneous forest canopy by high-resolution numerical modeling. For this purpose, a novel approach to model individual trees is implemented in our large-eddy simulation (LES). A group of sixteen fractal Pythagoras trees is placed in the computational domain and the tree elements are numerically treated as immersed boundaries. Our objective is to resolve the multiscale flow response starting at the diameter of individual tree elements up to the depth of the atmospheric surface layer. A reference run, conducted for the forest flow under neutral thermal stratification, produces physically meaningful turbulence statistics. Our numerical results agree quantitatively with data obtained from former field-scale LESs and wind tunnel experiments. Furthermore, the numerical simulations resolve vortex shedding behind individual branches and trunks as well as the integral response of the turbulent flow through the heterogeneous forest canopy. A focus is the investigation of the turbulence structure of the flow under stable thermal stratification and in response to the heating of the fractal tree crowns. For the stratified flows, statistical quantities, e.g. turbulent kinetic energy and vorticity, are presented and the turbulent exchange processes of momentum and heat are considered in detail. The onset and formation of coherent structures such as elevated shear layers above the diabatically heated forest canopy are analyzed. For the stably stratified flow, temperature ramps above the forest canopy were simulated in agreement with previous observations. Thermally driven vortices with a typical diameter of the canopy height were simulated when the tree crowns were diabatically heated. The impact of the coherent flow structures on the heat flux is investigated.

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer Forest canopy Fractal trees Heat Turbulence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baldocchi D.D. et al.: Predicting the onset of net carbon uptake by deciduous forests with soil temperature and climate data: a synthesis of FLUXNET data. Int. J. Biometeorol. 6, 377–387 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belcher S.E., Harman I.N., Finnigan J.J.: The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 479–504 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohrer G., Katul G.G., Walko R.L., Avissar R.: Exploring the effects of microscale structural heterogeneity of forest canopies using large-eddy simulations. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 132, 351–382 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bou-Zeid E., Meneveau C., Parlange M.B.: Large-eddy simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flow over heterogeneous surfaces: blending height and effective surface roughness. Water Resour. Res. 40, 2 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown K.W., Covey W.: The energy-budget evaluation of the micro-meteorological transfer process within a cornfield. J.Agric. Meteorol. 3, 13–96 (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brunet Y., Finnigan J.J., Raupach M.R.: A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: single-point velocity statistics. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 70, 95–132 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campos J.G., Acevedo O.C., Tota J., Manzi A.O.: On the temporal scale of the turbulent exchange of carbon dioxide and energy above a tropical rain forest in Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D08124 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cava D., Katul G.G.: Spectral short-circuiting and wake production within the canopy trunk space of an alpine hardwood forest. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 126, 415–431 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chester S., Meneveau C., Parlange M.: Modeling turbulent flow over fractal trees with renormalized numerical simulation. J.Comput. Phys. 225, 427–448 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Langre E.: Effects of wind on plants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 141–168 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doyle J.D. et al.: An intercomparison of T-REX mountain wave simulations and implications for mesoscale predictability. Mon. Weather Rev. 139, 2811–2831 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dupont S., Brunet Y.: Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a large-eddy simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 93–127 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dupont S., Irvine M.R., Bonnefond J.M., Lamaud E., Brunet Y.: Turbulent Structures in a Pine Forest with a Deep and Sparse Trunk Space: Stand and Edge Regions. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 143, 309–336 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elaydi S.N.: Discrete Chaos: With Applications in Science and Engineering. Chapman & Hall, New York (2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finnigan J.J.: Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 519–571 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finnigan J.J., Shaw R.: A wind-tunnel study of airflow in waving wheat: an EOF analysis of the structure of the large-eddy motion. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 96, 211–255 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finnigan J.J., Shaw R.H., Patton E.G.: Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy. J. Fluid Mech. 637, 387–424 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foken T., Wimmer F., Mauder M., Thomas C., Liebethal C.: Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 4395–4402 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frisch U.: Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fröhlich J.: Large Eddy Simulation Turbulenter Strömungen. Vieweg & Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao W., Shaw R.H., Paw K.T.: Observation of organized structure in turbulent flow within and above a forest canopy. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 47, 349–377 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldstein D., Handler R., Sirovich L.: Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field. J. Comput. Phys. 105, 354–366 (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gross G.: A numerical study of the air flow within and around a single tree. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 40, 311–327 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeong J., Hussain F.: On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katul G., Kuhn G., Schieldge J., Hsieh C.I.: The ejection-sweep character of scalar fluxes in the unstable surface layer. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 83, 1–26 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kundu P.K., Cohen I.M.: Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press, Elsevier (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kühnlein C., Smolarkiewicz P.K., Dörnbrack A.: Modelling atmospheric flows with adaptive moving meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 2741–2763 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mandelbrot B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Margolin L.G., Smolarkiewicz P.K., Sorbjan Z.: Large-eddy simulations of convective boundary layers using nonoscillatory differencing. Phys. D. 133, 390–397 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mittal R., Iaccarino G.: Immersed boundary methods. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 239–261 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nield D.A., Bejan A.: Convection in Porous Media. Springer, Berlin (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niinemets Ü., Seufert G., Steinbrecher R., Tenhunen J.D.: A model coupling foliar monoterpene emissions to leaf photosynthetic. New Phytol. 153, 257–275 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patton E.G. et al.: The canopy horizontal array turbulence study. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 92, 593–611 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peitgen H.O., Jürgens H., Saupe D.: Chaos and Fractals, New Frontiers of Science. Springer, New York (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Piotrowski Z.P., Smolarkiewicz P.K., Malinowski S.P., Wyszogrodzki A.A.: On numerical realizability of thermal convection. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 6268–6290 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Piotrowski Z.P., Wyszogrodzki A.A., Smolarkiewicz P.K.: Towards petascale simulation of atmospheric circulations with soundproof equations. Acta Geophys. 59, 1294–1311 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poggi D., Porporato A., Ridolfi L., Albertson J.D., Katul G.G.: The effect of vegetiation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 111, 565–587 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prusa J.M., Smolarkiewicz P.K.: An all-scale anelastic model for geophysical flows: dynamic grid deformation. J. Comput. Phys. 190, 601–622 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prusa J.M., Smolarkiewicz P.K., Wyszogrodzki A.A.: EULAG, a computational model for multiscale flows. Comput. Fluids 37, 1193–1207 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Poveda-Jaramillo G., Puente C.E.: Strange attractors in atmospheric boundary-layer turbulence. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 64, 175–197 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Raupach M.R., Coppin P.A., Legg B.J.: Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy part I: the turbulence structure. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 35, 21–52 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schlegel F., Stiller J., Bienert A., Maas H.G., Queck R., Bernhofer C.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Inhomogeneous Canopy Flows Using High Resolution Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 142, 1–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schmitt R.W.: The salt finger experiments of Jevons (1857) and Rayleigh (1880). J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 8–17 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schmitt R.W., Ledwell J.R., Montgomery E.T., Polzin K.L., Toole J.M.: Enhanced diapycnal mixing by salt fingers in the thermocline of the tropical Atlantic. Science 308, 685 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schulze T.P., Worster M.G.: Weak convection, liquid inclusions and the formation of chimneys in mushy layers. J. Fluid Mech. 388, 197–215 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shaw R.H., Hartog G., Neumann H.H.: Influence of foliar density and thermal stability on profiles of Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity in a deciduous forest. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 45, 391–409 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shaw R., Schumann U.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent-flow above and within a forest. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 61, 47–64 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Margolin L.G.: On forward-in-time differencing for fluids: extension to a curvilinear framework. Mon. Weather Rev. 121, 1847–1859 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Margolin L.G.: MPDATA: a finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. J. Comput. Phys. 140, 459–480 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Prusa J.M.: VLES modelling of geophysical fluids with nonoscillatory forward-in-time schemes. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 39, 799–819 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K.: Multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: an overview. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 50, 1123–1144 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Margolin L.G.: Studies in geophysics. In: Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., Rider, W. (eds.) Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics, pp. 413–438. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Sharman R., Weil J., Perry S., Heist D., Bowker G.: Building resolving large-eddy simulations and comparison with wind tunnel experiments. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 633–653 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Smolarkiewicz P.K., Winter C.: Pores resolving simulation of Darcy flows. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 3121–3133 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Staebler R.M., Fitzjarrald D.R.: Measuring canopy structure and the kinematics of subcanopy flows in two forests. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 44, 1161–1179 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stull R.B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (1988)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Su Z. et al.: EAGLE 2006—multi-purpose, multi-angle and multi-sensor in-situ and airborne campaigns over grassland and forest. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 833–845 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Thomas C., Mayer J.C., Meixner F.X., Foken T.: Analysis of low-frequency turbulence above tall vegetation using a Doppler sodar. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 119, 563–587 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yue W., Parlange M.B., Meneveau C., Zhu W., Van Hout R., Katz J.: Large-eddy simulation of plant canopy flows using plant-scale representation. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 124, 183–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wedi N.P., Smolarkiewicz P.K.: Extending Gal-Chen and Somerville terrain-following coordinate transformation on time dependent curvilinear boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 193, 1–20 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wesson K.H., Katul G.G., Siqueira M.: Quantifying organization of atmospheric turbulent eddy motion using nonlinear time series analysis. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 106, 507–525 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München (LMU)MunichGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Physik der AtmosphäreWeßlingGermany

Personalised recommendations