A linear stability analysis on the onset of thermal convection of a fluid with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity in a spherical shell

  • Masanori Kameyama
  • Hiroki Ichikawa
  • Arata Miyauchi
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

A linear stability analysis was performed in order to study the onset of thermal convection in the presence of a strong viscosity variation, with a special emphasis on the condition for the stagnant-lid (ST) convection where a convection takes place only in a sublayer beneath a highly viscous lid of cold fluid. We consider the temporal evolution (growth or decay) of an infinitesimal perturbation superimposed to a Boussinesq fluid with an infinite Prandtl number which is in a static (motionless) and conductive state in a basally heated planar layer or spherical shell. The viscosity of the fluid is assumed to be exponentially dependent on temperature. The linearized equations for conservations of mass, momentum, and internal (thermal) energy are numerically solved for the critical Rayleigh number, Rac, as well as the radial profiles of eigenfunctions for infinitesimal perturbations. The above calculations are repeatedly carried out by systematically varying (i) the magnitude of the temperature dependence of viscosity, E, and (ii) the ratio of the inner and outer radii of the spherical shell, γ. A careful analysis of the vertical structure of incipient flows demonstrated that the dominance of the ST convection can be quantitatively identified by the vertical profile of Δh (a measure of conversion between horizontal and vertical flows), regardless of the model geometries. We also found that, in the spherical shell relevant to the Earth’s mantle (γ = 0.55), the transition into ST convection takes place at the viscosity contrast across the layer \({r_\eta\simeq10^4}\) . Taken together with the fact that the threshold value of rη falls in the range of rη for a so-called sluggish-lid convection, our finding suggests that the ST-mode of convection with horizontally elongated convection cells is likely to arise in the Earth’s mantle solely from the temperature-dependent viscosity.

Keywords

Mantle convection Temperature-dependent viscosity Spherical shell Linear stability analysis Stagnant-lid convection 

References

  1. 1.
    Chandrasekhar S.: Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. The Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kameyama M., Kageyama A., Sato T.: Multigrid-based simulation code for mantle convection in spherical shell using Yin-Yang grid. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 171(1–4), 19–32 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kameyama M., Ogawa M.: Transitions in thermal convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity in a wide box. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 180(3-4), 355–367 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00171-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karato S.I., Wu P.: Rheology of the upper mantle: a synthesis. Science 260(5109), 771–778 (1993). doi:10.1126/science.260.5109.771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiefer W.S., Li Q.: Mantle convection controls the observed lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on present-day Mars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L18203 (2009). doi:10.1029/2009GL039827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Konopliv A.S., Banerdt W.B., Sjogren W.L.: Venus gravity: 180th degree and order model. Icarus 139(1), 3–18 (1999). doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li Q., Kiefer W.S.: Mantle convection and magma production on present-day Mars: Effects of temperature-dependent rheology. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L16203 (2007). doi:10.1029/2007GL030544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNamara A.K., Zhong S.: Degree-one mantle convection: dependence on internal heating and temperature-dependent rheology. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L01301 (2005). doi:10.1029/2004GL021082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moresi L.N., Solomatov V.: Numerical investigation of 2D convection with extremely large viscosity variations. Phys. Fluids 7, 2154–2162 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ogawa M., Schubert G., Zebib A.: Numerical simulations of three-dimensional thermal convection in a fluid with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 299–328 (1991)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ratcliff J.T., Schubert G., Zebib A.: Effects of temperature-dependent viscosity on thermal convection in a spherical shell. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena 97(1–3), 242–252 (1996). doi:10.1016/0167-2789(96)00150-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ratcliff J.T., Schubert G., Zebib A.: Steady tetrahedral and cubic patterns of spherical shell convection with temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Geophys. Res. 101(B11), 25,473–25,484 (1996). doi:10.1029/96JB02097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ratcliff J.T., Tackley P.J., Schubert G., Zebib A.: Transitions in thermal convection with strongly variable viscosity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 102(3–4), 201–212 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(97)00013-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schubert G., Turcotte D.L., Olson P.: Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solomatov V.S.: Scaling of temperature- and stress-dependent viscosity convection. Phys. Fluids 7, 266–274 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solomatov V.S., Moresi L.N.: Three regimes of mantle convection with non-Newtonian viscosity and stagnant-lid convection on the terrestrial planets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24(15), 1907–1910 (1997). doi:10.1029/97GL01682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Šrámek O., Zhong S.: Long-wavelength stagnant-lid convection with hemispheric variation in lithospheric thickness: link between Martian crustal dichotomy and Tharsis?. J. Geophys. Res. 115, E09010 (2010). doi:10.1029/2010JE003597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stemmer K., Harder H., Hansen U.: A new method to simulate convection with strongly temperature- and pressure-dependent viscosity in a spherical shell: applications to the Earth’s mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 157(3–4), 223–249 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2006.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stengel K.C., Oliver D.S., Booker J.R.: Onset of convection in a variable-viscosity fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 411–431 (1982). doi:10.1017/S0022112082002821 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tackley P.J.: Effects of strongly variable viscosity on three-dimensional compressible convection in planetary mantles. J. Geophys. Res. 101(B2), 3311–3332 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tackley P.J.: Self-consistent generation of tectonic plates in time-dependent, three-dimensional mantle convection simulations 1. Pseudoplastic yielding. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 1(8), 1021 (2000). doi:10.1029/2000GC000036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tackley P.J.: Self-consistent generation of tectonic plates in time-dependent, three-dimensional mantle convection simulations 2. Strain weakening and asthenosphere. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 1(8), 1026 (2000). doi:10.1029/2000GC000043 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tackley, P.J., Xie, S., Nakagawa, T., Hernlund, J.W.: Experimental studies of mantle convection: philosophy, accomplishments and thermo-chemical structure and evolution. In: van der Hilst, R.D., Bass, J., Matas, J., Trampert, J. (eds.) Earth’s Deep Mantle: Structure, Composition, and Evolution, Geophysical Monograph, vol. 160, pp. 83–99. AGU (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trompert R., Hansen U.: On the Rayleigh number dependence of convection with a strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. Phys. Fluids 10(2), 351–364 (1998). doi:10.1063/1.869527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turcotte D.L., Schubert G.: Geodynamics, pp. 456. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weertman J.: The creep strength of the Earth’s mantle. Rev. Geophys. 8, 145–168 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshida M.: Mantle convection with longest-wavelength thermal heterogeneity in a 3-D spherical model: degree one or two?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L23302 (2008). doi:10.1029/2008GL036059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yoshida M., Kageyama A.: Low-degree mantle convection with strongly temperature- and depth-dependent viscosity in a three-dimensional spherical shell. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B03412 (2006). doi:10.1029/2005JB003905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zebib A.: Linear and weakly nonlinear variable viscosity convection in spherical shells. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 4(5), 241–253 (1993). doi:10.1007/BF00417930 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao D.: Global tomographic images of mantle plumes and subducting slabs: insight into deep Earth dynamics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 146(1-2), 3–34 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhong S., McNamara A., Tan E., Moresi L., Gurnis M.: A benchmark study on mantle convection in a 3-D spherical shell using CitcomS. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q10017 (2008). doi:10.1029/2008GC002048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masanori Kameyama
    • 1
  • Hiroki Ichikawa
    • 1
  • Arata Miyauchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Geodynamics Research CenterEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations