Advertisement

Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 135–148 | Cite as

On criticism of the nature of objectivity in classical continuum physics

  • A. I. Murdoch
Original article

Abstract.

Murdoch (J. Elasticity 60, 233-242, 2000) showed that restrictions imposed upon response functions by material frame-indifference are the consequences of five distinct aspects of observer agreement (that is, of ‘objectivity’) and involve only proper orthogonal tensors. Accordingly it is unnecessary to invoke the ‘principle of invariance under superposed rigid motions’ (in the sense of ‘one observer, two motions’), which imposes a restriction upon nature. Liu (Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 16, 177-183, 2003, and Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 17, 125-133, 2005) has challenged, misinterpreted and misrepresented the content of both Murdoch’s work and this work. Here all criticisms of Liu are answered, his ‘counter-examples’ are used to amplify the tenets of Murdoch’s work, and a key modelling issue in the controversy is indicated. Further, the response function restrictions for a given observer, derived on the basis of considering other observers, are shown to be independent of possible differences in the scales of mass, length, and time employed by other observers.

Keywords:

material frame-indifference objectivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murdoch, A.I.: Objectivity in classical continuum physics: a rationale for discarding the ‘principle of invariance under superposed rigid body motions’ in favour of purely objective considerations. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 15, 309-320 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, I.-S.: On Euclidean objectivity and the principle of material frame-indifference. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 16, 177-183 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, I.-S.: Further remarks on Euclidean objectivity and the principle of material frame-indifference. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 17, 125-133 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Truesdell, C., Noll, W.: The Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics, Vol.III/3. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1965Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edelen, D.G.B., McLennan, J.A.: Material indifference: a principle or a convenience. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 11, 813-817 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murdoch, A.I.: On material frame-indifference, intrinsic spin, and certain constitutive relations motivated by the kinetic theory of gases. Arch. Rat. Mech.Anal. 83, 185-194 (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muschik, W.: Objectivity and frame-indifference revisited. Arch. Mech. 50, 541-547 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Speziale, C.G.: A review of material frame-indifference in mechanics. Appl. Mech. Rev. 51, 489-504 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Svendsen, B., Bertram, A.: On frame-indifference and form-invariance in constitutive theory. Acta Mechanica 132, 195-207 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müller, I.: On the frame dependence of stress and heat flux. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 45, 241-250 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts, P.H., Donnelly, R.J.: Superfluid mechanics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics Vol. 6 (ed. van Dyke, M., Vincenti, W.G., Wehausen, J.V.). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews (1974)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Speziale, C.G.: Some interesting properties of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 24, 1425-1427 (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steigmann, D.J.: Equilibrium theory for magnetic elastomers and magnetoelastic membranes. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 39, 1193-1216 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noll, W.: Lectures on the foundations of continuum mechanics and thermodynamics. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 52, 62-92 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murdoch, A.I.: On objectivity and material symmetry for simple elastic solids. J. Elasticity 60, 233-242 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murdoch, A.I.: On material frame-indifference. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 380, 417-426 (1982)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, R.M.: Mechanics of Composite Materials. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burnett, D.: The distribution of molecular velocities and the mean motion in a non-uniform gas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 40, 382-435 (1935)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Söderholm, L.H.: The principle of material frame-indifference and material equations of gases. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 14, 523-528 (1976)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Speziale, G.: On frame-indifference and iterative procedures in the kinetic theory of gases. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 19, 63-73 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Truesdell, C.: Correction of two errors in the kinetic theory of gases which have been used to cast unfounded doubt upon the principle of material frame-indifference. Meccanica 11, 196-199 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hills, R.N., Roberts, P.H.: Superfluid Mechanics for a high density of vortex lines. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 24, 43-71 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bertram, A., Svendsen, B.: On material objectivity and constitutive equations. Arch. Mech. 53, 653-675 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations