The reinforcing members are often added on an existing structure to improve stiffness of the structure up to required level. In general, the design targets for the reinforcing members need to be allocated for their designs. However, since the members are additively designed, it is difficult to predict behavior of the reinforcing members and their influence on the existing structure. Therefore, allocating the design targets is challenging task, and the targets based on engineering experience and intuition can lead to the repetitive design cycles. This paper proposes a method for determining target stiffness of a reinforcing member which makes an existing structure achieve the required performances. To utilize individual models of an existing structure and the reinforcing members in a design, the system of equations of the assembled structure is decomposed by using a substructuring technique. Additional boundary conditions are imposed on the interfaces between the structure and members to ensure consistency between models, and the target stiffness of the member is defined by using the boundary conditions. The optimal target stiffness and design of the members are determined through the use of a multidisciplinary design optimization technique, analytical target cascading. This method is applied to a simple portal frame and a body-in-white with reinforcing member of a vehicle manufactured by Hyundai Motor Company. By using the optimal target stiffness, reinforcing member of any shape can be designed independently and at little cost, without access of the existing structure model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams V (2008) A designer’s guide to simulation with finite element analysis. NAFEMS, Hamilton
Allison J T (2004) Complex system optimization: a review of analytical target cascading, collaborative optimization, and other formulations. Master’s thesis University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Austin-Breneman J, Honda T, Yang M C (2012) A study of student design team behaviors in complex system design. J Mech Des 134(12):124504
Braun R D (1997) Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design. Dissertation Stanford University, Stanford
Cramer E J, Dennis J J E, Frank P D, Lewis R M, Shubin G R (1994) Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM J Optimiz 4(4):754–776
Kang N, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros P Y, Yoo S, Na W, Park J, Featherman D (2014) Optimal design of commercial vehicle systems using analytical target cascading. Struct Multidisc Optim 50(6):1103–1114
Kim H M (2001) Target cascading in optimal system design. Dissertation University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Kim H M, Rideout D G, Papalambros P Y, Stein J L (2003) Analytical target cascading in automotive vehicle design. J Mech Des 125(3):481–489
Kim S, Lim W, Kim H, Ryu N, Kwon K, Lim S, Min S, Lee T H (2016) Robust target cascading for improving firing accuracy of combat vehicle. J Mech Sci Tech 30(12):5577–5586
Kokkolaras M, Louca L, Delagrammatikas G, Michelena N, Filipi Z, Papalambros P, Stein J, Assanis D (2004) Simulation-based optimal design of heavy trucks by model-based decomposition: an extensive analytical target cascading case study. Int J Heavy Veh Syst 11(3-4):403–433
Lee H C, Jung Y S, Oh H J, Kim S S (2014) Design of a hybrid composite strut tower for use in automobiles. Adv Compos Mater 23(3):275–291
Li Y, Lu Z, Michalek J J (2008) Diagonal quadratic approximation for parallelization of analytical target cascading. J Mech Des 130(5):051402
Lim W, Jang J, Kim S, Lee T H, Kim J, Lee K, Lee C, Kim Y (2016) Reliability-based design optimization of an automotive structure using a variable uncertainty. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut 230(10):1314–1323
Martins J R, Lambe A B (2013) Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. AIAA J 51(9):2049–2075
Michalek J J, Papalambros P Y (2005) An efficient weighting update method to achieve acceptable consistency deviation in analytical target cascading. J Mech Des 127(2):206–214
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1988) Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems. Tech. Rep. NASA-TM-101494, NASA Langley Research Center
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte J S, Sandusky R R (2000) Bilevel integrated system synthesis. AIAA J 38(1):164–172
Takamatsu M, Fujita H, Inoue H, Kijima M (1992) Development of lighter-weight, higher-stiffness body for new RX-7. Tech. Rep. 920244, SAE International
Tosserams S, Etman L, Papalambros P, Rooda J (2006) An augmented lagrangian relaxation for analytical target cascading using the alternating direction method of multipliers. Struct Multidisc Optim 31(3):176–189
Tosserams S, Kokkolaras M, Etman L, Rooda J (2010) A nonhierarchical formulation of analytical target cascading. J Mech Des 132(5):051002
Yang M, Liang X F (2011) Structural reinforced parts for improving roof crush performance. Adv Mat Res 189:391–394
Zienkiewicz O C, Taylor R L, Nithiarasu P, Zhu J (1977) The finite element method, vol 3. McGraw-hill, London
Some contents of this research are part of the “Multidisciplinary design optimization of vehicle body reinforce members” funded by Hyundai Motor Company. The authors appreciate the partial financial support from Hyundai Motor Company.
This research is partially and financially supported by Hyundai Motor Company.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Replication of results
For the purpose of replication of results, MATLAB codes of the portal frame example presented in Section 4.1 are provided as a supplementary material. Codes include static analysis of the portal frame, target stiffness allocation, re-design of the structure B with I-beam cross-section, and optimization using IDF method. MATLAB 2018b was used to generate the results. Codes and files related to vehicle BIW example presented in Section 4.2 cannot be provided for the purposes of confidentiality.
Responsible Editor: Jianbin Du
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S., Kim, S., Lee, T.H. et al. Optimum target stiffness allocation for design of a reinforcing member on an existing structure. Struct Multidisc Optim (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02479-1
- Target stiffness allocation
- Reinforcing member
- Structure reinforcement
- Complex structure
- Design optimization
- Analytical target cascading