Advertisement

Optimization and prefabrication of timber Voronoi shells

  • Hao HuaEmail author
  • Ludger Hovestadt
  • Peng Tang
Research Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce a variant of the timber grid shell, the timber Voronoi shell, whose surface is reticulated by Voronoi tessellation and whose edges are made of discrete dimensional timber. This work explores form-finding methods of the Voronoi shell as a compressive funicular shell. Two closed-form solutions to shape initialization are proposed. We develop methods for minimizing the deviation from coplanarity between timber members and adjacent surface normal in order to facilitate manufacturing. A well-defined fabrication process is important for making the physical structure consistent with the structural model. A 6-axis robot with a motor spindle is employed to prefabricate the timber so the in situ manual assembly becomes easier. A parametric model describes the joint details. We formulate the robotic toolpath as a closed-form function of the resultant mesh from form finding. Thus, a general-purpose programming language can directly implement the mesh optimization and manufacturing processes without CAD or CAM software. The physical implementations, including an exhibition pavilion, validated the approach.

Keywords

Grid shell Form finding Timber Fabrication Structural optimization Toolpath 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The prefabrication and assembly of the structures were organized by Prof. Biao Li’s Institute of Architectural Algorithms and Applications, Southeast University, Nanjing. The team members of the Upsilon project include H. Hua, J.C. Wang, B. Li, P. Tang, Y.Y. Chen, C.Y. Cai, J.N. Xu, J.Z. Chen, S.Y. Li, H.J. Li, N.L. Liu, H. Li, J.R. Zeng, H.C. Guo, X. Wang, Y.L. Chen, H.D. Wu, L.X. Wei, and J.S. Zhang.

We thank the reviewers and the editor for their constructive remarks towards improving the manuscript. We also thank Prof. Lei He from School of Civil Engineering at Southeast University for his advice on numerical optimization.

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778118] and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China [UDC2017020212].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barnes MR (1999) Form finding and analysis of tension structures by dynamic relaxation. Int J Space Struct 14(2):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedi S, Mann S, Menzel C (2003) Flank milling with flat end milling cutters. Comput Aided Des 35 (3):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertsekas D (2016) Nonlinear programming, 3rd. Athena ScientificGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhooshan S, Veenendaal D, Block P (2014) Particle-spring systems: design of a cantilevering concrete canopy. In: Shell structures for architecture: form finding and optimization. Routledge, pp 103–113Google Scholar
  5. Block PPCV (2009) Thrust network analysis: exploring three-dimensional equilibrium. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  6. Block P, Van Mele T, Liew A, DeJong M, Escobedo D, Ochsendorf J (2018) Structural design, fabrication and construction of the Armadillo vault. Struct Eng 96(5):10–20Google Scholar
  7. Chang TC, Wysk RA (1997) Computer-aided manufacturing. Prentice Hall PTRGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Dong F (2013) Robot machining: recent development and future research issues. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1489–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig JJ (2005) Introduction to robotics: mechanics and control, vol 3. Pearson/Prentice, Hall Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimčić M (2011) Structural optimization of grid shells based on genetic algorithms. PhD thesis, Universität StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Amico B, Kermani A, Zhang H (2014) Form finding and structural analysis of actively bent timber grid shells. Eng Struct 81:195– 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eversmann P, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2017) Robotic prefabrication of timber structures: towards automated large-scale spatial assembly. Construc Robot 1(1-4):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gramazio F, Kohler M, Willmann J (2014) The robotic touch: how robots change architecture: Gramazio & Kohler Research ETH Zurich 2005-2013. Park BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. Hua H (2018a) Javakuka open source library http://javakuka.org. accessed 12 09 2018
  15. Hua H (2018b) Upsilon pavilion https://vimeo.com/287979548, Accessed 18 11 2019
  16. Kilian A, Ochsendorf J (2005) Particle-spring systems for structural form finding. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct 46(2):77–84Google Scholar
  17. Larue A, Altintas Y (2005) Simulation of flank milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4-5):549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liddell I (2015) Frei Otto and the development of gridshells. Case Studies Struc Eng 4:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linkwitz K, Veenendaal D (2014) Nonlinear force density method. Shell Struc Archit–Form Finding Optim, 143–155Google Scholar
  20. Menges A (2016) Computational material culture. Archit Des 86(2):76–83Google Scholar
  21. Naicu D, Harris R, Williams C (2014) Timber gridshells: design methods and their application to a temporary pavilion. In: Proceedings of World conference on timber engineering (WCTE), WCTE 2014; Conference date: 10-08-2014 Through 14-08-2014Google Scholar
  22. Paoli CCA (2007) Past and future of grid shell structures. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  23. Pietroni N, Tonelli D, Puppo E, Froli M, Scopigno R, Cignoni P (2015) Statics aware grid shells, vol 34, Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar
  24. Pottmann H, Liu Y, Wallner J, Bobenko A, Wang W (2007) Geometry of multi-layer freeform structures for architecture. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 26(3):65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarcar M, Rao KM, Narayan KL (2008) Computer aided design and manufacturing. PHI Learning Pvt. LtdGoogle Scholar
  26. Schek HJ (1974) The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3(1):115–134MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang C, Sun X, Gomes A, Wallner J, Pottmann H (2015) Form-finding with polyhedral meshes made simple. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 posters SIGGRAPH ’15. ACM, New York, pp 5:1–5:1 , https://doi.org/10.1145/2787626.2787631.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2787626.2787631
  28. Thoma A, Adel A, Helmreich M, Wehrle T, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2018) Robotic fabrication of bespoke timber frame modules. In: Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Springer, pp 447–458Google Scholar
  29. Van Mele T, Panozzo D, Sorkine-Hornung O, Block P (2014) Best-fit thrust network analysis. Shell Structures for Architecture-Form Finding and Optimization, 157–170Google Scholar
  30. Veenendaal D, Block P (2012) An overview and comparison of structural form finding methods for general networks. Int J Solids Struct 49(26):3741–3753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Willmann J, Knauss M, Bonwetsch T, Apolinarska AA, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2016) Robotic timber construction-expanding additive fabrication to new dimensions. Autom Construct 61:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Willmann J, Block P, Hutter M, Byrne K, Schork T (2018) Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArchitectureSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation (Southeast University), Ministry of EducationNanjingChina
  3. 3.CAADETH HönggerbergZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations