Robust design optimization of an angular contact ball bearing under manufacturing tolerance
- 130 Downloads
The performances of an angular contact ball bearing (ACBB) are influenced by its geometric dimensions that can have uncertainty due to manufacturing tolerances. Uncertainty of these geometric dimensions results in uncertainty of the performances. This study performed robust design optimization considering the uncertainty of the geometric dimensions which affect the performances of an ACBB, mounted on the main shaft of a grinder. Six geometric parameters and an axial preload were selected as design variables. Among these design variables, three geometric variables were regarded as random design variables that have significant uncertainty of geometric dimensions. To ensure manufacturing precision of the grinder, simultaneously maximizing means and minimizing standard deviations of both axial and radial stiffness values were defined as objective functions. Constraints were imposed to consider uncertainty of the performance functions. A quasi-static analysis was employed to evaluate the bearing performances. The means and standard deviations of the performances were evaluated by the enhanced dimensional reduction method. Robust design optimization was performed using the progressive quadratic response surface method. The robust optimum design revealed that the performance and robustness of both stiffness values were improved than the initial design of the ACBB while satisfying all constraints.
KeywordsRobust design optimization Angular contact ball bearing Quasi-static analysis Enhanced dimensional reduction method Progressive quadratic response surface method
This study was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (no. 20184010201710). The authors extend their gratitude to PIDOTECH Inc. for providing PIAnO, a commercial software for process integration and design optimization software for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbas M, Youssef A, Metwalli S (2010) Ball bearing fatigue and wear life optimization using elastohydrodynamic and genetic algorithm. In: Proc. ASME 2010 Int Des Eng Tech Conf Comput Inf Eng Conf (IDETC/CIE 2010), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 15–18 August:849–856Google Scholar
- Budynas R, Nisbett K (2015) Shigley’s mechanical engineering design tenth edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Changsen W (1991) Analysis of rolling element bearings. Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Feng J, Sun Z, Sun H (2016) Optimization of structure parameters for angular contact ball bearings based on Kriging model and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(23):4298–4308Google Scholar
- Hamrock BJ, Dowson D (1981) Ball bearing lubrication: the elastohydrodynamics of elliptical contacts. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Harris TA, Kotzalas MN (2007) Rolling bearing analysis, fifth edition. Taylor and Francis group, FloridaGoogle Scholar
- Mahadevan S (1997) In: Cruse TA (ed) Monte Carlo simulation. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 123–146Google Scholar
- NSK (2006) Super precision bearings, Cat. no. 1254 KGoogle Scholar
- Ochiai M, Kato N, Hashimoto H (2018) Groove shape optimization of thrust air bearing for small size spindle considering the processing errors. In: Proc. ASME-JSME 2018 Jt Int Conf Inf Storage Process Syst Micromechatron Inf Precis Equip (ISPS-MIPE 2018), San Francisco, California, USA, 29–30 AugustGoogle Scholar
- Savsani V (2013) Multi-objective design optimization of rolling element bearings using ABC, AIA and PSO technique. Int J Energy Optim Eng 2:102–125Google Scholar
- Tudose L, Kulcsar G, Stănescu C (2013) Pareto approach in multi-objective optimal design of single-row cylindrical rolling bearings. In: Dobre G (ed) Power transmissions. Mechanisms and machine science, vol 13. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Youn B, Xi Z, Wells L, Wang P (2006) Enhanced dimension-reduction (eDR) method for sensitivity-free uncertainty quantification. 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, September 6–8, USAGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Ren C (2010) Optimal design of high speed angular cntact ball bearing using a multiobjective evolution algorithm. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Control Ind Eng (CCIE 2010), Wuhan, China, 5–6 June:320–324.Google Scholar