Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 1021–1031 | Cite as

Simple single-scale microstructures based on optimal rank-3 laminates

  • E. Träff
  • O. Sigmund
  • J. P. GroenEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

With the goal of identifying optimal elastic single-scale microstructures for multiple loading situations, the paper shows that qualified starting guesses, based on knowledge of optimal rank-3 laminates, significantly improves chances of convergence to near optimal designs. Rank-3 laminates, optimal for a given set of anisotropic loading conditions, are approximated on a single scale using a simple mapping approach. We demonstrate that these mapped microstructures perform relatively close to theoretical energy bounds. Microstructures with a performance even closer to the bounds can be obtained by using the approximated rank-3 structures in a further step as starting guesses for inverse homogenization problems. Due to the nonconvex nature of inverse homogenization problems, the starting guesses based on rank-3 laminates outperform classical starting guesses with homogeneous or random material distributions. Furthermore, the obtained single-scale microstructures are relatively simple, which enhances manufacturability. Results, obtained for a wide range of loading cases, indicate that microstructures with performance within 5–8% of the theoretical optima can be guarantied, as long as feature sizes are not limited by minimium size constraints.

Keywords

Inverse homogenization Optimal microstructures Starting guess 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Villum Fonden through the Villum investigator project InnoTop. The authors would also like to thank Krister Svanberg for providing the MATLAB MMA code.

References

  1. Allaire G (2002) Shape optimization by the homogenization method. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaire G, Aubry S (1999) On optimal microstructures for a plane shape optimization problem. Structural Optimization 17(2):86–94Google Scholar
  3. Allaire G, Geoffroy-Donders P, Pantz O (2018) Topology optimization of modulated and oriented periodic microstructures by the homogenization method, working paper or preprint. Computer & Mathematics with ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreassen E, Andreasen C (2014) How to determine composite material properties using numerical homogenization. Commun Math Sci 83:488–495Google Scholar
  5. Andreassen E, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2014) Design of manufacturable 3D extremal elastic microstructure. Mech Mater 69(1):1–10Google Scholar
  6. Avellaneda M (1987) Optimal bounds and microgeometries for elastic two-phase composites. SIAM J Appl Math 47(6):1216–1228MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Avellaneda M, Milton G (1988) Bounds on the effective elasticity tensor of composites based on two-point correlations. In: American society of mechanical engineers, Petroleum division (Publication) PD. vol 24. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp 89–93Google Scholar
  8. Bendsøe M, Sigmund O (2004) Topology optimization-theory, methods and applications. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger J, Wadley H, McMeeking R (2017) Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness. Nature 543(7646):533–537Google Scholar
  10. Bourdin B, Kohn RV (2008) Optimization of structural topology in the high-porosity regime. J Mech Phys Solids 56(3):1043–1064MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherkaev A (2000) Variational methods for structural optimization. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Clausen A, Wang F, Jensen JS, Sigmund O, Lewis JA (2015) Topology optimized architectures with programmable Poisson’s ratio over large deformations. Adv Mater 27(37):5523–5527Google Scholar
  13. Coelho P, Cardoso J, Fernandes P, Rodrigues H (2011) Parallel computing techniques applied to the simultaneous design of structure and material. Adv Eng Softw 42(5):219–227zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Díaz AR, Lipton R, Soto CA (1995) A new formulation of the problem of optimum reinforcement of Reissner-Mindlin plates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 123(1):121–139MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Francfort GA, Murat F (1986) Homogenization and optimal bounds in linear elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 94(4):307–334MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabovsky Y, Kohn RV (1995) Anisotropy of the Vigdergauz microstructure. J Appl Mech 62(4):1063–1065zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Groen JP, Sigmund O (2017) Homogenization-based topology optimization for high-resolution manufacturable micro-structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 113(8):1148–1163Google Scholar
  18. Guedes J, Rodrigues H, Bendsøe MP (2003) A material optimization model to approximate energy bounds for cellular materials under multiload conditions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25(5-6):446–452MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Guest J, Prévost J, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238– 254MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Krein M, Nudelman A (1977) The Markov moment problem and extremal problems, Translations of mathematical monographs, vol 50. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsen UD, Sigmund O, Bouwsta S (1997) Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Microelectromech Syst 6(2):99–106Google Scholar
  22. Lipton R (1994) On optimal reinforcement of plates and choice of design parameters. Control Cybern 23 (3):481–493MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu L, James R, Leo P (2007) Periodic inclusion–matrix microstructures with constant field inclusions. Metall and Mater Trans A 38(4):781–787Google Scholar
  24. Liu L, Yan J, Cheng G (2008) Optimum structure with homogeneous optimum truss-like material. Computers & Structures 86(13):1417–1425. structural OptimizationGoogle Scholar
  25. Lurie KA, Cherkaev AV (1984) G-closure of a set of anisotropically conducting media in the two-dimensional case. J Optim Theory Appl 42(2):283–304MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Milton GW (1986) Modelling the properties of composites by laminates. In: Ericksen JL, Kinderlehrer D, Kohn R, Lions J (eds) Homogenization and effective moduli of materials and media. Springer, New York, pp 150–174Google Scholar
  27. Neves MM, Sigmund O, Bendsøe MP (2002) Topology optimization of periodic microstructures with a penalization of highly localized buckling modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54(6):809–834MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Osanov M, Guest JK (2016) Topology optimization for architected materials design. Annu Rev Mater Res 46(1):211–233Google Scholar
  29. Pantz O, Trabelsi K (2008) A post-treatment of the homogenization method for shape optimization. SIAM J Control Optim 47(3):1380–1398MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrigues H, Guedes J (2002) Hierarchical optimization of material and structure. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24(1):1–10Google Scholar
  31. Schury F, Stingl M, Wein F (2012) Efficient two-scale optimization of manufacturable graded structures. SIAM J Sci Comput 34(6):B711–B733MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Sigmund O (1994) Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: an inverse homogenization problem. Int J Solids Struct 31(17):2313–2329MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Sigmund O, Bendsøe MP (1999) On the optimality of bone microstructure. In: Pedersen P (ed) IUTAM symposium on synthesis in bio solid mechanics. Springer, Netherlands, pp 221–234Google Scholar
  34. Sigmund O (2000) A new class of extremal composites. J Mech Phys Solids 48(2):397–428MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Sigmund O, Aage N, Andreassen E (2016) On the (non-)optimality of Michell structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:361–372MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Sivapuram R, Dunning PD, Kim HA (2016) Simultaneous material and structural optimization by multiscale topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(5):1267–1281MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomsen CR, Wang F, Sigmund O (2018) Buckling strength topology optimization of 2D periodic materials based on linearized bifurcation analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:115–136MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Vigdergauz SB (1994a) Three-dimensional grained composites of extreme thermal properties. J Mech Phys Solids 42(5):729–740MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Vigdergauz SB (1994b) Two-dimensional grained composites of extreme rigidity. J Appl Mech 61(2):390–394zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Xia L, Breitkopf P (2017) Recent advances on topology optimization of multiscale nonlinear structures. Arch Comput Meth Eng 24(2):227–249MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Solid MechanicsTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations