Advertisement

Combined length scale and overhang angle control in minimum compliance topology optimization for additive manufacturing

  • Jeroen PellensEmail author
  • Geert Lombaert
  • Boyan Lazarov
  • Mattias Schevenels
Research Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In order to ensure that the optimized design is immediately manufacturable, it is essential to take into account the appropriate geometric constraints during the optimization. Two important constraints are minimum length scale and maximum overhang angle. A minimum length scale is needed to ensure that the condition on minimal printable feature sizes is satisfied, while an imposed overhang angle eliminates the need for a temporary support structure. This paper first shows that both constraints cannot simultaneously be met by a straightforward coupling of existing methods for length scale and overhang angle control. Next, a new filtering scheme is introduced, based on a specific combination of spatial filters, which allows direct control over these constraints in a minimum compliance topology optimization problem. A 2D benchmark problem and a complex 3D case study are presented to demonstrate that the proposed filtering scheme successfully imposes a target length scale in both the solid and the void phase of the design domain, while simultaneously allowing control over the overhang angle.

Keywords

Topology optimization Additive manufacturing Length scale control Overhang angle control Manufacturing constraints 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author is a doctoral fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge Shibo Ren from ARUP for sharing the information required to perform the 3D case study.

References

  1. Aage N, Lazarov BS (2013) Parallel framework for topology optimization using the method of moving asymptotes. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47:493–505MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aage N, Andreassen E, Lazarov BS (2014) Topology optimization using PETSc: an easy-to-use, fully parallel, open source topology optimization framework. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(3):565–572MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allaire G, Jouve F, Michailidis G (2016) Thickness control in structural optimization via a level set method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53:1349–1382MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allaire G, Dapogny C, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017a) Shape optimization of a layer by layer mechanical constraint for additive manufacturing. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I:699–717MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allaire G, Dapogny C, Estevez A, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017b) Structural optimization under overhang constraints imposed by additive manufacturing technologies. J Comput Phys, 295–328Google Scholar
  6. Amir O, Mass Y (2018) Topology optimization for staged construction. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(4):1679–1694Google Scholar
  7. Amir O, Lazarov B (In review) Achieving stress-constrained topological designs via length scale controlGoogle Scholar
  8. Atzeni E (2012) A Salmi economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams M, Brown J, Brune P, Buschelman K, Dalcin L, Eijkhout V, Gropp W, Kaushik D, Knepley M (2016) Petsc users manual: technical report ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.7 Argonne National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker R, Grzesiak A, Henning A (2005) Rethink assembly design. Assem Autom 25(4):262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidiscip Optim 1 (4):193–202MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2004) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(9):2143–2158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication symposium. Austin, pp 348–362Google Scholar
  15. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26–27):3443–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cormier D, Harrysson T, Mahale O (2003) Rapid manufacturing in the 21st century. J Chin Instit Indus Eng 20(3):193–202Google Scholar
  17. Díaz AR, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization. Struct Optim 10(1):40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galjaard S, Hofman S, Ren S (2014) New opportunities to optimize structural designs in metal by using additive manufacturing. In: Advances in architectural geometry. Springer, pp 79–93Google Scholar
  19. Galjaard S, Hofman S, Perry N, Ren S (2015) Optimizing structural building elements in metal by using additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the international association for shell and spatial structures (IASS)Google Scholar
  20. Gaynor AT, Guest JK (2014) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing: considering maximum overhang constraint. In: 15th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, pp 16–20Google Scholar
  21. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  22. Guest JK, Prevost JH, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238– 254MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hägg L, Wadbro E (2017) Nonlinear filters in topology optimization: existence of solutions and efficient implementation for minimum compliance problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1017–1028MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jog CS, Haber RB (1996) Stability of finite element models for distributed-parameter optimization and topology design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 130(3–4):203–226MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kranz J, Herzog D, Emmelmann C (2015) Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of lightweight structures in tial6v4. J Laser Appl, 27Google Scholar
  26. Langelaar M (2016a) An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimization of print-ready designs. Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimizationGoogle Scholar
  27. Langelaar M (2016b) Topology optimization of 3D self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf 12(A):60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazarov BS, Wang F, Sigmund O (2016) Length scale and manufacturability in density-based topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 86(1–2):189–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu J, Ma Y (2016) A survey of manufacturing oriented topology optimization methods. Adv Eng Softw, 175Google Scholar
  30. Mirzendehdel A, Suresh K (2016) Support structure constrained topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des, 1–13Google Scholar
  31. Pratt WK (1991) Digital image processing. WileyGoogle Scholar
  32. Qian X (2017) Undercut and overhang angle control in topology optimization: a density gradient based integral approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosen D (2014) Design for additive manufacturing: past, present, and future directions. J Mech Des, 136Google Scholar
  34. Schevenels M, Sigmund O (2016) On the implementation and effectiveness of morphological close-open and open-close filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):15–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(4–5):401– 424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snelson K (2012) The art of tensegrity. Int J Space Struct 27:2 and 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes - a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359– 373MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang F, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2011) On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(6):767–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang D, Yang Y, Yi Z, Su X (2013) Research on the fabricating quality optimization of the overhanging surface in SLM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1471–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu SL, Cai YW, Cheng GD (2010) Volume preserving nonlinear density filter based on heaviside functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(4):495–505MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang W, Li D, Zhang J, Guo X (2016) Minimum length scale control in structural topology optimization based on the moving morphable components (mmc) approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 311:327–355MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1–3):309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering ScienceKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering ScienceKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil EngineeringThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations