An improved numerically-stable equivalent static loads (ESLs) algorithm based on energy-scaling ratio for stiffness topology optimization under crash loads
- 212 Downloads
The standard equivalent static loads (ESLs) method for stiffness topology optimization under crash condition may lead to exaggerated equivalent loads, which is not appropriate to be incorporated into the linear static topology optimization and whereby hinder the optimization process. To overcome this disadvantage, an improved ESLs algorithm based on energy-scaling ratio is proposed to guarantee the numerical stability, especially for the first several cycles with relatively larger differences of strain energy between the original crash simulation and equivalent static analysis. At each cycle, the equivalent external static forces are calculated by multiplying the stiffness matrix and the displacement vector at the time with maximal strain energy during the crash simulation. A further adaptive energy-scaling operation for those forces are performed by a weighting factor of square root of the energy ratio to the standard equivalent static loads for the crash problem based on the judging criterion. The newly equivalent loads are incorporated into the static topology optimization, and topology results are filtered into a black-white design for the crash simulation to avoid the numerical issues due to existing of low-density elements. The process is repeated until the convergence criteria is satisfied. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by investing two crash design problems.
KeywordsStiffness topology optimization Equivalent static loads (ESLs) Crash loads Energy-scaling Numerically-stable
This work is supported by the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars, the Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing City (NO. Z161100001416007) and the National Key R&D Program of China (NO. 2017YFB0103801).
- Bendsøe MP (1995) The homogenization approach to topology design. In: Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 5–77Google Scholar
- Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Da DC, Chen JH, Cui XY, Li GY (2017) Design of materials using hybrid cellular automata. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1652-1
- Duddeck F, Bujny M, Zeng D (2017) Topology optimization methods based on nonlinear and dynamic crash simulations. In: 11th European LS-DYNA Conference 2017. Salzburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Lazarov BS, Wang F (2017) Maximum length scale in density based topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:826–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.02.018
- Wu J, Clausen A, Sigmund O (2017) Minimum compliance topology optimization of shell-infill composites for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.018
- Zheng J, Luo Z, Jiang C, Ni B, Wu J (2017) Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization with multidimensional parallelepiped convex model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:2205–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1851-9