Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1477–1491 | Cite as

Analytical sensitivities for statistically extrapolated extreme load constraints in structural optimization

RESEARCH PAPER

Abstract

For some applications in structural optimization, it is required to have constraints on the extreme loads that represent long term loading conditions. This usually involves a statistical extrapolation procedure that fits maxima from simulated load time series to short term extreme value distributions and then extrapolates to an n-year return value. Often such situations are highly simplified because of the apparent complexity involved in evaluating the sensitivity of such constraints. However, such simplification is not necessary. In this study, we present a method to evaluate the sensitivities of such extrapolated extreme load constraints in a semi-analytical way. The method uses the implicit function theorem to obtain local derivatives at the points defined by the solution of the maximum likelihood estimate that is used to calculate the parameters of the short term extreme value distributions. Comparing with high accuracy finite difference estimates, the method is shown to give reasonably accurate values. We also demonstrate how the method can be used to estimate the uncertainty of the estimated n-year return value caused by uncertainty in both the maximum likelihood estimate and inherent uncertainties in the data. The method then is applied to a simple optimization example and shown to perform very well compared with using finite difference estimates for the sensitivities. Finally, we note that the method is in principle fairly general and could be applied to similar problems that do not specifically involve statistical extrapolation.

Keywords

Optimization Extreme loads Statistical load extrapolation Analytical sensitivities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly supported by NOWITECH FME (Research Council of Norway, contract no. 193823) and by the Danish Council for Strategic Research through the project ”Advancing BeYond Shallow waterS (ABYSS) - Optimal design of offshore wind turbine support structures”.

References

  1. Agarwal P, Manuel L (2010) Load extrapolation methods for offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Chakraborty S, Chowdhury R (2017) A hybrid approach for global sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 158:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chew KH, Tai K, Ng EYK, Muskulus M (2015) Optimization of offshore wind turbine support structures using an analytical gradient-based method. Energy Procedia 80:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chew KH, Tai K, Ng EYK, Muskulus M (2016) Analytical gradient-based optimization of offshore wind turbine substructures under fatigue and extreme loads. Mar Struct 47:23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer-Verlag, LondonCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox DR, Hinkley DV (1979) Theoretical statistics. Chapman and Hall, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Davison AC (2003) Statistical models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Det Norske Veritas (2014) Design of offshore wind turbine structures. Offshore Standard, DNV-OS-J101Google Scholar
  9. Edwards CHJ (1973) Advanced calculus of several variables. Academic Press, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fedem Technology AS (2016) Fedem user’s guide. Release 7.2. Fedem Technology AS, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  11. Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B (2011) Statistical distributions, 4th edn. Wiley, HobokenMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimshaw SD (1993) Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the generalized pareto distribution. Technometrics 35(2):185–191CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1987) Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized pareto distribution. Technometrics 29(3):339–349CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Iooss B, Lemaître P (2015) A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In: Meloni C, Dellino G (eds) Uncertainty management in simulation-optimization of complex systems: Algorithms and Applications. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  16. Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (2006) Methods of structural safety. Mineola, N.Y., Dover PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  17. Martins ES, Stedinger JR (2000) Generalized maximum-likelihood generalized extreme-value quantile estimators for hydrologic data. Water Resour Res 36(3):737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oest J, Sørensen R, Overgaard LCT, Lund E (2016) Structural optimization with fatigue and ultimate limit constraints of jacket structures for large offshore wind turbines. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(3):779–793CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Shao Q, Younes A, Fahs M, Mara TA (2017) Bayesian sparse polynomial chaos expansion for global sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:474–496CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang H, Chen L, Ye F, Chen L (2017) Global sensitivity analysis for fiber reinforced composite fiber path based on D-MORPH-HDMR algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim pp 1–16, doi:10.1007/s00158-017-1681-9

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology NTNUTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations