To avoid unpractical optimal design without support
- 283 Downloads
In some cases, topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to applied loads having a zero resultant force may result in an unpractical design without support. This phenomenon occurs because the original optimization problem neglects the possible change of the direction of applied load. This brief note sheds the light on avoiding such an unpractical design from the engineering viewpoint. In our work, this usually neglected phenomenon is systematically illustrated by employing a series of two-dimensional (2D) cantilever design problems using a simple and efficient Bi-directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) method. An alternative scheme is further recommended to tackle the concerned conundrum. The proposed scheme not only can avoid unpractical designs without any support, but also takes into account the inherent uncertainty property in designing actual engineering structures.
KeywordsTopology optimization Zero resultant force Unpractical design BESO Uncertain applied load
This brief note investigates one phenomenon which is usually ignored by the researchers when a continuum structure is optimally designed by using the topology optimization methods (Suzuki and Kikuchi 1991; Sigmund 2001; Xie and Steven 1993; Wang et al. 2003; Allaire et al. 2004; Junker and Hackl 2015, 2016; Bendsøe and Kikuchi 1988; Jantos et al. 2016). Specifically, topology optimization may lead to an unpractical design without support when the applied loads are self-balanced with the zero resultant force. This phenomenon is abnormal as an optimal structure should provide the best transmission path between applied loads and supports. In other words, materials should be continuously distributed to connect from the loading points to the constraint points.
For the convenience of investigating this phenomenon, one simple case is studied here as shown in Fig. 3b. The structure is subjected to two upward loads: one is 1 N at the middle of the right side and another is 1 N at top right corner, respectively. Meanwhile, one downward load at its bottom right corner, with a magnitude of 2 N is also applied. Once again, the unpractical design without support as shown in Fig. 3c is obtained by using traditional topology optimization technique.
Therefore, it is of great importance to find a way to tackle such a critical engineering design problem. In this brief note, this problem is systematically investigated on designing a series of cantilever structures by using the BESO approach (Huang and Xie 2007, 2009). Finally, we suggest one alternative scheme to handle the concerned design problem.
2 Investigation of the concerned problem
In this section, the BESO method is used to investigate the concerned problem. It should be noted that this method can certainly be replaced by any other traditional continuum topology optimization methods. The concept of the BESO approach is very simple by removing inefficient elements from and adding efficient materials to the design domain.
In the above examples, symmetric or asymmetric applied loads with a zero resultant force may result in optimal designs without supports, which are totally different from expected cantilever structures. The reason for this phenomenon is that the BESO method like other traditional topology optimization methods only provides the optimal solution under the given conditions. Once the assumed conditions are slightly changed, e.g., the direction of applied loads in the above examples, the resulting designs may be extremely non-optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to find an alternative scheme to deal with the possible change of the direction of applied loads with a zero resultant force.
3 An alternative scheme
In this section, we present an alternative scheme to figure out the conundrum based on our previous work (Liu et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2017). We employ interval mathematics to equivalently transform the topology optimization problem with the uncertainties of the direction of applied loads into a deterministic one with multiple load cases. The scheme is simply presented here. For more details, the readers are referred to references (Liu et al. 2015, 2017).
By doing so, we can only run finite element analysis 2s times per iteration to solve the problem in Eq. (9) by using the BESO method, which is much more efficient than that of conducting traditional topology optimization under multiple load cases directly (Liu et al. 2017).
It should be emphasized that, the alternative scheme can also be integrated into other topology optimization algorithms by considering the uncertainty of directions of applied loads (Csébfalvi 2017a, 2017b; Csébfalvi and Lógó 2015; Lógó et al. 2009; Dunning et al. 2011; Dunning and Kim 2013; Liu et al. 2016). However, the proposed scheme used in this work can deal with design problems under large uncertainties without considering the accurate distribution of the uncertain variables.
4 Concluding remarks
One problem in designing structures subjected to applied loads with a zero resultant force is systematically studied by using BESO method in this brief note. It is revealed that traditional topology optimization methods may produce unpractical design without support, which is extremely non-optimal when the load directions are slightly changed. One alternative scheme is subsequently presented to tackle such conundrum. The proposed scheme considers the inherent uncertainty property in designing actual engineering structures, which is demonstrated by a series of 2D cantilever design problems. It is worth noting that we only suggest one possible solution, namely, considering the uncertainty of the loading direction, to figuring out the unpractical design problem. There are certainly some other possible solutions for the problem, for example, we can also define the non-design domains (Zuo and Xie 2015; Huang and Xie 2008a, 2008b; Zuo et al. 2009), which enforce the connection between the applied loads and supports. This brief note provides the useful methodology for designing structures subjected to applied loads with a zero resultant force.
The first author is partially supported by the scholarship No. 201506130053 of China Scholarship Council. This work was supported jointly by the project of “Chair Professor of Lotus Scholars Program” in Hunan province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11672104) and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars in China (No. 11225212). The authors also would like to thank the support from the Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent New Energy Vehicle, and the Hunan Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Car.
- Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988)Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224Google Scholar
- Csébfalvi A (2017a) Robust topology optimization: a new algorithm for volume-constrained expected compliance minimization with probabilistic loading directions using exact analytical objective and gradient. Period Polytech Civ 61(1):154–163Google Scholar
- Csébfalvi A (2017b) Structural optimization under uncertainty in loading directions: benchmark results. Adv Eng Softw In press. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.02.006
- Csébfalvi A, Lógó J (2015) Critical examination of volume-constrained topology optimization for uncertain load magnitude and direction. In: Proc of ICCSEEC 15. Civil-comp press, Stirlingshire, UKGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Wen G., Chen X, Qing Q (2015) Topology optimization of continuum structures with uncertainty in loading direction. In: Proc of M2D, Ponta Delgada, PortugalGoogle Scholar