Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 371–390 | Cite as

Topology optimization of structures with gradient elastic material

RESEARCH PAPER
  • 712 Downloads

Abstract

Topology optimization of structures and mechanisms with microstructural length-scale effect is investigated based on gradient elasticity theory. To meet the higher-order continuity requirement in gradient elasticity theory, Hermite finite elements are used in the finite element implementation. As an alternative to the gradient elasticity, the staggered gradient elasticity that requires C 0-continuity, is also presented. The solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) like material interpolation schemes are adopted to connect the element density with the constitutive parameters of the gradient elastic solid. The effectiveness of the proposed formulations is demonstrated via numerical examples, where remarkable length-scale effects can be found in the optimized topologies of gradient elastic solids as compared with linear elastic solids.

Keywords

Topology optimization Gradient elasticity (GE) Staggered gradient elasticity (SGE) Length-scale effect Hermite finite elements 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The presented work is supported in part by the US National Science Foundation through Grant CMS-1055314. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

  1. Aifantis EC (1992) On the role of gradients in the localization of deformation and fracture. Int J Eng Sci 30(10):1279–1299CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Altan B, Aifantis EC (1992) On the structure of the mode III crack-tip in gradient elasticity. Scr Metall Mater 26(2):319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askes H, Aifantis EC (2011) Gradient elasticity in statics and dynamics: an overview of formulations, length scale identification procedures, finite element implementations and new results. Int J Solids Struct 48(13):1962–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Askes H, Morata I, Aifantis EC (2008) Finite element analysis with staggered gradient elasticity. Comput Struct 86(11):1266–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):635–654MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(9):2143–2158MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruggi M, Taliercio A (2012) Maximization of the fundamental eigenfrequency of micropolar solids through topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(4):549–560MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001a) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26–27):3443–3459. doi: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00278-4 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001b) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26):3443–3459CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen PW, Klarbring A (2008) An introduction to structural optimization, vol 153. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  13. Cosserat E, Cosserat F (1909) Théorie des corps déformables. ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Deaton JD, Grandhi RV (2014) A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(1):1–38MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eringen AC (1965) Linear theory of micropolar elasticity. DTIC DocumentGoogle Scholar
  16. Eschenauer HA, Olhoff N (2001) Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review*. Appl Mech Rev 54(4):331–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleck N, Hutchinson J (1997) Strain gradient plasticity. Adv Appl Mech 33:296–361MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Fried E, Gurtin ME (2006) Tractions, balances, and boundary conditions for nonsimple materials with application to liquid flow at small-length scales. Arch Ration Mech Anal 182(3):513–554. doi: 10.1007/s00205-006-0015-7 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Green AE, Rivlin RS (1964) Multipolar continuum mechanics. Arch Ration Mech Anal 17(2):113–147MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Javili A, dell’Isola F, Steinmann P (2013) Geometrically nonlinear higher-gradient elasticity with energetic boundaries. J Mech Phys Solids 61(12):2381–2401. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.06.005 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Kröner E (1963) On the physical reality of torque stresses in continuum mechanics. Int J Eng Sci 1(2):261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakes R (1995) Experimental methods for study of Cosserat elastic solids and other generalized elastic continua. Continuum models for materials with microstructure 1–25Google Scholar
  23. Li L, Khandelwal K (2014) Two-point gradient-based MMA (TGMMA) algorithm for topology optimization. Comput Struct 131:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li L, Khandelwal K (2015a) An adaptive quadratic approximation for structural and topology optimization. Comput Struct 151:130–147. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li L, Khandelwal K (2015b) Topology optimization of structures with length-scale effects using elasticity with microstructure theory. Comput Struct 157:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li L, Khandelwal K (2015c) Volume preserving projection filters and continuation methods in topology optimization. Eng Struct 85:144–161. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu S, Su W (2010) Topology optimization of couple-stress material structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 40(1–6):319–327MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Mindlin RD (1964) Micro-structure in linear elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 16(1):51–78MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Mindlin R, Eshel N (1968) On first strain-gradient theories in linear elasticity. Int J Solids Struct 4(1):109–124CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Mindlin R, Tiersten H (1962) Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 11(1):415–448MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Papanicolopulos SA, Zervos A, Vardoulakis I (2009) A three-dimensional C1 finite element for gradient elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77(10):1396–1415. doi: 10.1002/nme.2449 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Petera J, Pittman JFT (1994) Isoparametric Hermite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37(20):3489–3519. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620372006 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Polizzotto C (2003) Gradient elasticity and nonstandard boundary conditions. Int J Solids Struct 40(26):7399–7423. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.06.001 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Polizzotto C (2013) A second strain gradient elasticity theory with second velocity gradient inertia – part I: constitutive equations and quasi-static behavior. Int J Solids Struct 50(24):3749–3765. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Polizzotto C (2016) A note on the higher order strain and stress tensors within deformation gradient elasticity theories: physical interpretations and comparisons. Int J Solids Struct 90:116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rovati M, Veber D (2007) Optimal topologies for micropolar solids. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(1):47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ru C, Aifantis EC (1993) A simple approach to solve boundary-value problems in gradient elasticity. Acta Mech 101(1–4):59–68MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25(4):493–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sigmund O, Maute K (2012) Sensitivity filtering from a continuum mechanics perspective. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(4):471–475MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stölken J, Evans A (1998) A microbend test method for measuring the plasticity length scale. Acta Mater 46(14):5109–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Su W, Liu S (2015) Topology design for maximization of fundamental frequency of couple-stress continuum. Struct Multidiscip Optim 1–14Google Scholar
  44. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes- a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Tenek LT, Aifantis E (2002) A two-dimensional finite element implementation of a special form of gradient elasticity. Comput Model Eng Sci 3(6):731–742MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Toupin RA (1962) Elastic materials with couple-stresses. Arch Ration Mech Anal 11(1):385–414MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Veber D, Taliercio A (2012) Topology optimization of three-dimensional non-centrosymmetric micropolar bodies. Struct Multidiscip Optim 45(4):575–587MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang F, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2011) On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(6):767–784CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Zervos A (2008) Finite elements for elasticity with microstructure and gradient elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73(4):564–595MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations