Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 1157–1172 | Cite as

Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: Eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design

  • Andrew T. GaynorEmail author
  • James K. Guest
RESEARCH PAPER

Abstract

Additively manufactured components often require temporary support material to prevent the component from collapsing or warping during fabrication. Whether these support materials are removed chemically as in the case of many polymer additive manufacturing processes, or mechanically as in the case of (for example) Direct Metal Laser Sintering, the use of sacrificial material increases total material usage, build time, and time required in post-fabrication treatments. The goal of this work is to embed a minimum allowable self-supporting angle within the topology optimization framework such that designed components and structures may be manufactured without the use of support material. This is achieved through a series of projection operations that combine a local projection to enforce minimum length scale requirements and a support region projection to ensure a feature is adequately supported from below. The magnitude of the self-supporting angle is process dependent and is thus an input variable provided by the manufacturing or design engineer. The algorithm is demonstrated on standard minimum compliance topology optimization problems and solutions are shown to satisfy minimum length scale, overhang angle, and volume constraints, and are shown to be dependent on the allowable magnitudes of these constraints.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing 3D printing Projection methods Anchors Design for additive manufacturing Self-supporting Overhang features 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors dedicate this paper to George Rozvany, Founder President of the International Society for Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (ISSMO) and Founding Editor of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, for his tremendous, pioneering research in the fields of structural and topology optimization, and for his friendship and support of the senior author.

This research was partially supported by an appointment of the first author to the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (USARL) administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USARL, and partially supported by the US National Science Foundation under award 1462453. The authors also thank Krister Svanberg for kindly providing the MMA optimizer code. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, or the Army Research Lab.

References

  1. Bendsøe M (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1(4):193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(9):2143–2158MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruns T, Tortorelli D (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26-27):3443–3459CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloots M, Spierings A, Wegener K (2013) Assessing new support minimizing strategies for the additive manufacturing technology SLM. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams CB, Wang CC, Shin YC, Zhang S, Zavattieri PD (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaynor AT, Guest JK (2014) Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing: Considering Maximum Overhang Constraint. 15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AviationGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaynor AT, Meisel NA, Williams CB, Guest JK (2014) Multiple-material topology optimization of compliant mechanisms created via polyjet three-dimensional printing. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(6):061,015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gorny B, Niendorf T, Lackmann J, Thoene M, Troester T, Maier H (2011) In situ characterization of the deformation and failure behavior of non-stochastic porous structures processed by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 528(27):7962–7967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guest J, Prévost J, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238–254MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Guest JK (2009a) Imposing maximum length scale in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37 (5):463–473Google Scholar
  12. Guest JK (2009b) Topology optimization with multiple phase projection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(1-4):123–135Google Scholar
  13. Guest J K (2014) Projection-based topology optimization using discrete object sets. ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Buffalo, NY, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  14. Guest JK (2015) Optimizing the layout of discrete objects in structures and materials: A projection-based topology optimization approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:330–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guest JK, Smith Genut LC (2010) Reducing dimensionality in topology optimization using adaptive design variable fields. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(8):1019–1045zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Guest JK, Zhu M (2012) Casting and milling restrictions in topology optimization via projection-based algorithms. ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. 913–920Google Scholar
  17. Guest JK, Asadpoure A, Ha S H (2011) Eliminating beta-continuation from heaviside projection and density filter algorithms. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(4):443–453MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Ha SH, Guest JK (2014) Optimizing inclusion shapes and patterns in periodic materials using discrete object projection. Struct Multidiscip Optim:1–16Google Scholar
  19. Hu K, Jin S, Wang C C (2015) Support slimming for single material based additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 65:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R, Young P (2013) Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213(7):1019–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jansen M, Lombaert G, Diehl M, Lazarov B, Sigmund O, Schevenels M (2013) Robust topology optimization accounting for misplacement of material. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(3):317–333MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: A method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mercelis P, Kruth JP (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12(5):254–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mumtaz K, Vora P, Hopkinson N (2011) A method to eliminate anchors/supports from directly laser melted metal powder bed processes. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  25. Poulsen T (2003) A new scheme for imposing a minimum length scale in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57(6):741–760MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Rozvany G (1996) Some shortcomings in Michell’s truss theory. Struct Optim 12(4):244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rozvany G, Birker T (1995) Generalized Michell structures - exact least-weight truss layouts for combined stress and displacement constraints: Part I - general theory for plane trusses. Struct Optim 9(3-4):178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rozvany G, Gollub W (1990) Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports-I. Int J Mech Sci 32(12):1021–1043CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Rozvany G (1998) Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization. Struct Optim 15(1):42–48CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25(4):493–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(4-5):401–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 22(2):116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Svanberg K (1987) Method of moving asymptotes - a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas D (2009) The development of design rules for selective laser melting. University of Wales Institute, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  35. Vandenbroucke B, Kruth J (2007) Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang F, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O (2011) On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(6):767–784CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu C, Chai W, Huang Y, Markwald R (2012) Scaffold-free inkjet printing of three-dimensional zigzag cellular tubes. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(12):3152–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu S, Cai Y, Cheng G (2010) Volume preserving nonlinear density filter based on heaviside functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(4):495–505MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou M, Rozvany G (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1-3):309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou M, Lazarov BS, Wang F, Sigmund O (2015) Minimum length scale in topology optimization by geometric constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:266–282MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Manufacturing Technology BranchWeapons and Materials Research Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, RDRL-WMM-DAberdeenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations