Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 1003–1016 | Cite as

An active learning kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables

  • Xufeng Yang
  • Yongshou LiuEmail author
  • Yi Gao
  • Yishang Zhang
  • Zongzhan Gao
Research Paper

Abstract

Hybrid reliability analysis (HRA) with both random and interval variables is investigated in this paper. Firstly, it is figured out that a surrogate model just rightly predicting the sign of performance function can meet the requirement of HRA in accuracy. According to this idea, a methodology based on active learning Kriging (ALK) model named ALK-HRA is proposed. When constructing the Kriging model, the presented method only finely approximates the performance function in the region of interest: the region where the sign tends to be wrongly predicted. Based on the constructed Kriging model, Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is carried out to estimate both the lower and upper bounds of failure probability. ALK-HRA is accurate enough with calling the performance function as few times as possible. Four numerical examples and one engineering application are investigated to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

Keywords

Hybrid reliability Random variable Interval variable Active learning Kriging model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Aerospace Support Fund (NBXW0001) and Foundation Research Funds of Northwestern Polytechnical University (JCY20130123).

References

  1. Au S, Papadimitriou C, Beck J (1999) Reliability of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple design points. Struct Saf 21:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balesdent M, Morio J, Marzat J (2013) Kriging-based adaptive importance sampling algorithms for rare event estimation. Struct Saf 44:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bect J, Ginsbourger D, Li L et al (2012) Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure. Stat Comput 22:773–793zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bichon B, Eldred M, Swiler L et al (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46:2459–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bichon B, McFarland J, Mahadevan S (2011) Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:1386–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du X (2007) Interval reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Du X (2008) Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Design (ASME) 130:1401–1410Google Scholar
  8. Dubourg V, Sudret B, Bourinet J-M (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44:673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumasa A, Echard B, Gaytona N et al (2013) AK-ILS: an active learning method based on kriging for the inspection of large surfaces. Precis Eng 37:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M et al (2013) A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elishakoff I (1995a) Essay on uncertainties in elastic and viscoelastic structures: from A M. Freudenthal’s criticisms to modern convex modeling. Comput Struct 56:871–895zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elishakoff I (1995b) Discussion on: a non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 17:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elishakoff I (1999) Are probabilistic and anti-optimization approaches compatible? whys and hows in uncertainty modelling: probability, fuzziness and antioptimization. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Gablonsky J (1998) Implementation of the DIRECT Algorithm. Center for Research in Scientific Computation, Technical Rept. CRSC-TR98-29, North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC, AugGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo J, Du X (2009) Reliability sensitivity analysis with random and interval variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78:1585–1617zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo S, Lu Z (2002) Hybrid probabilistic and non-probabilistic model of structural reliability. Chinese J Mech Strength 24:524–526Google Scholar
  18. Huang B, Du X (2008) Probabilistic uncertainty analysis by mean-value first order saddlepoint approximation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang C, Lu G, Han X et al (2012) A new reliability analysis method for uncertain structures with random and interval variables. Int J Mech Mater Des 8:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Global Optim 13:455–492zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaymaz I (2005) Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lophaven S, Nielsen H, Sondergaard J (2002) DACE, a matlab Kriging toolbox, version 2.0. Tech. Rep. IMM-TR-2002-12; Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
  23. Luo Y, Kang Z, Alex L (2009) Structural reliability assessment based on probability and convex set mixed model. Comput Struct 87:1408–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luo X, Li X, Zhou J et al (2012) A Kriging-based hybrid optimization algorithm for slope reliability analysis. Struct Saf 34:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Möller B, Beer M (2008) Engineering computation under uncertainty - capabilities of non-traditional models. Comput Struct 86:1024–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Picheny V, Ginsbourger D, Roustant O et al (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region. J Mech Design 132:071008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qin Q, Lin D, Mei G et al (2006) Effects of variable transformations on errors in FORM results. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 91:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qiu Z, Elishakoff I (2001) Anti-optimization technique-a generalization of interval analysis for nonprobabilistic treatment of uncertainty. Chaos Soliton Fract 12:1747–1759zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qiu Z, Wang J (2010) The interval estimation of reliability for probabilistic and non-probabilistic hybrid structural system. Eng Fail Anal 17:1142–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ranjan P, Bingham D, Michailidis G (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes. Technometrics 50:527–541MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma G, Martin J (2009) MATLAB®: a language for parallel computing. Int J Parallel Prog 37(1):3–36zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang J, Qiu Z (2010) The reliability analysis of probabilistic and interval hybrid structural system. Appl Math Model 34:3648–3658zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang X, Qiu Z, Elishakoff I (2008) Non-probabilistic set-theoretic model for structural safety measure. Acta Mech 198:51–64zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang P, Lu Z, Tang Z (2013) An application of the Kriging method in global sensitivity analysis with parameter uncertainty. Appl Math Model 37:6543–6555MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wei P, Lu Z, Hao W et al (2012) Efficient sampling methods for global reliability sensitivity analysis. Comput Phys Commun 183:1728–1743zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiao N, Huang H, Wang Z et al (2012) Unified uncertainty analysis by the mean value first order saddlepoint approximation. Struct Multidisc Optim 46:803–812zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xufeng Yang
    • 1
  • Yongshou Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yi Gao
    • 1
  • Yishang Zhang
    • 1
  • Zongzhan Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Aircraft Reliability Engineering Department of Engineering MechanicsNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations