Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 621–630 | Cite as

Suspension system performance optimization with discrete design variables

  • Thomas H. Langer
  • Thorkil K. Iversen
  • Ole Ø. Mouritsen
  • Morten K. Ebbesen
  • Michael R. Hansen
Industrial Application

Abstract

Suspension systems on commercial vehicles have become an important feature meeting the requirements from costumers and legislation. The performance of the suspension system is often limited by available catalogue components. Additionally the suspension performance is restricted by the travel speed which highly influences the ride comfort. In this article a suspension system for an articulated dump truck is optimized in sense of reducing elapsed time for two specified duty cycles without violating a certain comfort threshold level. The comfort threshold level is here defined as a whole-body vibration level calculated by ISO 2631-1. A three-dimensional multibody dynamics simulation model is applied to evaluate the suspension performance. A non-gradient optimization routine is used to find the best possible combination of continuous and discrete design variables including the optimum operational speed without violating a set of side constraints. The result shows that the comfort level converges to the comfort threshold level. Thus it is shown that the operational speed and hence the operator input influences the ride comfort level. Three catalogue components are identified by the optimization routine together with a set of continuous design variables and two operational speeds one for each load case. Thus the work demonstrates handling of human factors in optimization of a mechanical system with discrete and continuous design variables.

Keywords

Ride comfort Whole-body vibration Off-highway vehicles Suspension Hydraulic-mechanical system design Discrete design variables 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research work is funded by an Industrial PhD-grant, journal no. 08-036080, from the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation under the Danish Ministry for Science, Technology and Innovation.

References

  1. Andersson J (2000) A survey of multiobjective optimization in engineering design. Technical LiTH-IKP-R-1097. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. Box MJ (1965) A new method of constraint optimization and a comparison with other methods. Comput J 8: 42–52MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buzdugan LI, Balling O, Lee PC, Balling C, Freeman JS, Huck F (1999) Multirate integration for real-time simulation of wheel loader hydraulics. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1999 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference, Las Vegas, NV, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Dudzinski PA (2005) Lenksysteme für Nutzfahrzeuge. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Els PS (2005) The applicability of ride comfort standards to off-road vehicles. J Terramechs 42(1):47–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2004.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Union (2002) Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding exposure of workers to the risks arising from the physical agents (vibration). European ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  7. European Union (2006) Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC. European ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  8. Filla R, Palmberg JO (2003) Using dynamic simulation in the development of construction machinery. In: Proceedings of the eight Scandinavian international conference on fluid power, Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Giliomee CL (2005) Mathematical modelling of hydraulic accumulators. University of Pretoria EtdGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzalez F, Gonzalez M, Cuadrado J (2009) Weak coupling of multibody dynamics and block diagram simulation tools. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference. ASME, San Diego (CA), USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin MJ, Howarth HVC, Pitts PM, Fischer S, Kaulbars U, Donati PM, Bereton PF (2006) Guide to good practice on wholebody vibration. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/63655/. Accessed 20 Nov 2011
  12. Hansen MR, Andersen TO (2005) Design optimization of hydraulically actuated lifting table using mapping techniques. In: Proceedings of the ninth Scandinavian international conference on fluid power SICFP, Linköping, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansson P (1995) Optimization of agricultural tractor cab suspension using the evolution method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 12:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO (1997) ISO 2631-1 mechanical vibration and shock evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 1: General requirements. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO (2002) ISO 5008 Agricultural wheeled tractors and field machinery—measurement of whole-body vibration of the operator. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. Jönsson P, Löfroth C (2007) RESULT: stor besparingspotential med bränslesnål skotning (Significant savings with fuel-efficient logging). Tech. Rep. 12, Skogforsk, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  17. Langer TH, Mouritsen OØ, Ebbesen MK, Hansen MR (2009) A tire model for off-highway simulation and comfort evaluation. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference, San Diego (CA), USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Langer TH, Christensen BB, Mouritsen OØ, Hansen MR (2010) Optimization of front axle suspension system of articulated dump truck. In: Proceedings of the first joint international conference on multibody system dynamics, Lappeenranta, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayton AG (2009) Evaluation of whole-body vibration exposures for haulage truck and loader operators in quarry operations. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference, San Diego (CA), USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Nikravesh PE (1988) Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  21. Rasmussen PW, Iversen F, Halling B, Hounsgaard G, Mølbak HG, Kristensen FD, Lyngbæk E, Rasmussen NB, Jessen BB, Jannerup O (1996) Hydraulik Ståbi. Teknisk Forlag A/S, KøbenhavenGoogle Scholar
  22. Rimell AN, Mansfield NJ (2007) Design of digital filters for frequency weightings required for risk assessments of workers exposed to vibration. Ind Health 45:512–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saeki M (2002) Path following control of articulated vehicle by backward driving. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on control applicationsGoogle Scholar
  24. Savaresi SM, Poussot-Vassal C, Spelta C, Sename O, Dugard L (2011) Semi-Active Suspension Control for Vehicles. Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiemessen IJ, Hulshof CTJ, Frings-Dresen MHW (2007) An overview of strategies to reduce whole-body vibration exposure on drivers: a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon 37:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toscano J (2009) Improving operator comfort. http://www.sae.org/mags/sohe/6727. Accessed 20 Nov 2011
  27. Tüchsen F, Feveile H, Christensen KB, Krause N (2010) The impact of self-reported exposure to whole-body-vibrations on the risk of disability pension among men: a 15 year prospective study. BMC Public Health 10(305). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458- 10-305
  28. Uys PE, Els PS, Thoresson M (2007) Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds. J Terramechs 44(2):163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Velmurugan P, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Sankaranarayanasamy K (2011) Whole body vibration analysis for suspended cabin tractor semitrailer drivers. J Exp Techn . doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2011.00786.x Google Scholar
  30. Wikström B, Kjellberg A, Dallner M (1991) Whole-body vibration. A comparison of different methods for the evaluation of mechanical shocks. Int J Ind Ergon 7(1):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas H. Langer
    • 1
  • Thorkil K. Iversen
    • 1
  • Ole Ø. Mouritsen
    • 2
  • Morten K. Ebbesen
    • 3
  • Michael R. Hansen
    • 3
  1. 1.Research and Development DepartmentA/S Hydrema ProduktionStøvringDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringAalborg UniversityAalborg ØDenmark
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringUniversity of AgderGrimstadNorway

Personalised recommendations