Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 125–136

Aero-mechanical optimisation of a structural fan outlet guide vane

Industrial Application

Abstract

The aero-mechanical optimisation of a fan outlet guide vane (OGV) in the bypass duct of a modern turbofan engine is presented. The purpose of the described outlet guide vane arrangement is to remove the swirl from the flow coming from the fan and to connect the engine core structurally with the bypass duct and the engine mounts respectively. For that reason the outlet guide vanes have to fulfill aerodynamic requirements—such as low pressure loss and large working range and turning of the absolute flow to 0 degree—as well as the structural requirement to withstand the engine loads in all operating conditions. Such an arrangement has the advantage, that additional struts downstream of the fan outlet guide vane become obsolete, which is beneficial for the engine length and weight and hence the engine specific fuel consumption. At the same time the structural and aerodynamic requirements on such an outlet guide vane are intuitively contradictory. Therefore the design is more complex than for a conventional purely aerodynamic guide vane. To achieve the different requirements the conventional iterative design process has been replaced by a multi-disciplinary approach, which delivers an aero-mechanically optimised fan outlet guide vane geometry based on aerodynamic and mechanical boundary conditions and constraints. The prescribed boundary conditions are the structural load cases (flight conditions) and the aerodynamic inlet and outlet conditions for the fan design point. In addition an existing bypass duct geometry is used to get a valid comparison with a conventionally designed outlet guide vane/strut arrangement. In the structural optimisation, carried out as a parameter study, the effect of several geometrical parameters is investigated using the software ABAQUS. The aerodynamic optimisation is performed using the 2D-CFD-solver MISES on individual profile sections such that a minimum pressure loss and a maximum working range is achieved. For that purpose the profile shape is modified freely taking into account the constraints from the structural optimisation. A 3D-RANS-CFD analysis of the optimised vane and the comparison with the conventional vane/strut arrangement confirmed the improved performance of the chosen design approach and showed a significant reduction in pressure loss (ΔP/D) of nearly 20% compared to the conventional OGV/strut arrangement, leading to an SFC reduction of about 0.5%.

Keywords

Outlet guide vane Fan Bypass duct 

Nomenclature

\(\upbeta _{2}\)

Outlet angle

CFD

Computational fluid dynamics

D

Dynamic pressure

DoE

Design of experiment

Δ

Difference

ff

Fitness function

mm

Millimeter

MTO

Maximum take-off

MRT

Maximum reverse thrust

N

Newton

P

Total pressure

RANS

Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes

(S)OGV

(Structural) outlet guide vane

SFC

Specific fuel consumption

WEM

Whole engine model

\(\upomega\)

Loss

2D/3D

Two/three-dimensional

References

  1. Clemen C, Stark U (2003) Compressor blades with sweep and dihedral: a parameter study. In: 5th European conference on turbomachinery/Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  2. Drela M, Youngren H (1996) A users’s guide to MISES 2.4. MIT Computational Aerospace Sciences LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  3. Falkenauer E (1994) Genetic algorithms and grouping problems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning. Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Gustavsson R (2006) Design study of advanced metallic structural integrated fan outlet guide vanes in civil jet engines. Master’s Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Division of CAD, Lulea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  6. Holewa A, Kröger G, Nicke E, Clemen C, Herzog H (2009) Optimisation of the struts in a bypass duct of a civil aircraft engine to minimize the circumferential pressure variation. ISABE-2009-1152Google Scholar
  7. Hughes CE (2001) Aerodynamic performance of scale-model turbofan outlet guide vanes designed for low noise. NASA/TM-2001-211352, AIAA-2202-0374Google Scholar
  8. Lapworth L (2004) HYDRA-CFD: a framework for collaborative cfd development”. In: International conference on scientific and engineering computation (IC-SEC), Singapore, 30 June–02 July 2004Google Scholar
  9. Oessenich R (2004) Kosten- und gewichtsoptimierte Designkonzeptstudie eines Intermediate Compressor Gehäuses (IMC) für eine zukünftige Zweiwellen-Triebwerksandwendung. Diploma-thesis at Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG, Dahlewitz, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Shahpar S, Lapworth L (2003) PADRAM: parametric design and rapid meshing system for turbomachinery optimisation. In: Paper GT-2003-38698, ASME turbo expo, Atlanta Georgia, 16–19 June 2003Google Scholar
  11. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439Google Scholar
  12. Voss C, Nicke E (2008) Automatische Optimierung von Verdichterstufen. Technical Library Hannover, University Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Walker AD, Carotte JF, McGuirk JJ (2006) Enhanced external aerodynamic performance of a generic combustor using an integrated ogv/prediffuser design technique. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2006, Barcelona, Spain, GT2006-90184, vol 129, pp 80–93Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KGBlankenfelde-MahlowGermany

Personalised recommendations