Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 231–242 | Cite as

Geometrical aspects of optimum truss like structures

  • Arkadiusz Mazurek
  • William F. Baker
  • Cenk Tort
Research Paper

Abstract

The authors obtain graphical rules to construct discrete optimum structures without the use of analytical or numerical optimization processes. Structures investigated are limited to those having a single loaded point and two points of support (three-point problems). The cost of structures is assumed to be proportional to their theoretical weight and to a performance index. The performance index is derived using the Lagrange multiplier method to minimize deflection of the loaded point with the given total volume of material. Solutions of simple problems, obtained with a gradient-based minimizing procedure, lead through a series of observations to the generalized solution of optimum discrete structures. The authors determine that optimum discrete structure for three-point problems can be described using the angles between four truss elements connected in every non-support node. These four angles are the same for every node of the structure.

Keywords

Discrete optimum Axial only optimum structures Michell cantilever Michell truss Hencky Net Topology optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. G. H. Paulino and Ms. L. Stromberg at The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Dr. Juan Carrion at Skidmore, Owings and Merrill for their excellent suggestions during the preparation of this paper.

References

  1. Achtziger W (1997) Topology optimization of discrete structures: an introduction in view of computational and nonsmooth aspects. In: Rozvany GIN (ed) Topology optimization in structural mechanics. Springer, Vienna, pp 57–100Google Scholar
  2. Baker WF (1992) Energy-based design of lateral systems. Struct Eng Int 2:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckers M, Fleury C (1997) A primal–dual approach in truss topology optimization. Comput Struct 64(1–4):77–88zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan ASL (1962) The design of Michell optimum structures. Ministry of Aviation Aeronautical Research Council Report No 3303Google Scholar
  5. Dewhurst P (2001) Analytical solutions and numerical procedures for minium-weight Michell structures. J Mech Phys Solids 49:445–467zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewhurst P, Fang N, Srithongchai S (2009) A general boundary approach to the construction of Michell truss structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:373–384CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Eschenauer H, Olhoff N, Schnell W (1997) Applied structural mechanics: fundamentals of elasticity, load-bearing structures, structural optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 313Google Scholar
  8. Friedman A (1971) Advanced calculus. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Graczykowski C, Lewiński T (2006a) Michell cantilevers constructed within trapezoidal domains—part I: geometry of Hencky nets. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:27–45Google Scholar
  10. Graczykowski C, Lewiński T (2006b) Michell cantilevers constructed within trapezoidal domains—part II: virtual displacement fields. Struct Multidisc Optim 32:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hemp WS (1973) Optimum structures. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirsch U (1997) Reduction and expansion processes in topology optimization. In: Rozvany GIN (ed) Topology optimization in structural mechanics. Springer, Vienna, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  13. Lewiński T, Rozvany GIN (2007) Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization II: three-sided polygonal supports. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martínez P, Martí P, Querin OM (2007) Growth method for size, topology, and geometry optimization of truss structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michell AGM (1904) The limits of economy of material in frame structures. Philat Mag 8:589–597Google Scholar
  16. Nguyen TH, Paulino GH, Song J, Le CH (2010) A computational paradigm for multiresolution topology optimization (MTOP). Struct Multidisc Optim 41:525–539CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Prager W (1970) Optimization of structural design. J Optim Theory Appl 6(1):1–21zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Prager W (1978a) Nearly optimal design of trusses. Comput Struct 8:451–454zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prager W (1978b) Optimal layout of trusses with finite numbers of joints. J Mech Phys Solids 26:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rozvany GIN (1996) Some shortcomings in Michell’s truss theory. Struct Optim 12:244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Talischi C, Paulino GH, Pereira A, Menezes IFM (2009) Polygonal finite elements for topology optimization: a unifying paradigm. A unifying paradigm. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82:671–698Google Scholar
  22. Zhou K, Li J (2004) The exact weight of discretized Michell trusses for a central point load. Struct Multidisc Optim 28:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arkadiusz Mazurek
    • 1
  • William F. Baker
    • 1
  • Cenk Tort
    • 1
  1. 1.Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLP.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations