The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights
- 8k Downloads
As a common concept in multi-objective optimization, minimizing a weighted sum constitutes an independent method as well as a component of other methods. Consequently, insight into characteristics of the weighted sum method has far reaching implications. However, despite the many published applications for this method and the literature addressing its pitfalls with respect to depicting the Pareto optimal set, there is little comprehensive discussion concerning the conceptual significance of the weights and techniques for maximizing the effectiveness of the method with respect to a priori articulation of preferences. Thus, in this paper, we investigate the fundamental significance of the weights in terms of preferences, the Pareto optimal set, and objective-function values. We determine the factors that dictate which solution point results from a particular set of weights. Fundamental deficiencies are identified in terms of a priori articulation of preferences, and guidelines are provided to help avoid blind use of the method.
KeywordsMulti-objective optimization Weighted sum Preferences
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gembicki FW (1974) Performance and sensitivity optimization: a vector index approach. PhD dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
- Gennert MA, Yuille AL (1988) Determining the optimal weights in multiple objective function optimization. In: Second international conference on computer vision (held in Los Alamos, CA), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, pp 87–89Google Scholar
- Goicoechea A, Hansen DR, Duckstein L (1982) Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hwang C-L, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. In: Beckmann M, Kunzi HP (eds) Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, no 186. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Kassaimah SA, Mohamed AM, Kolkailah FA (1995) Bi-criteria optimum design of laminated plates under uniform load and shear. In: Proceedings of the 27th international SAMPLE technical conference (held in Albuquerque, NM), 27, pp 731–737Google Scholar
- Lin JG (1975) Three methods for determining Pareto-optimal solutions of multiple-objective problems. In: Ho YC, Mitter SK (eds) Directions in large-scale systems. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Marler RT (2009) A study of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering applications. VDM, SaarbruckenGoogle Scholar
- Stadler W, Dauer JP (1992) Multicriteria optimization in engineering: a tutorial and survey. In: Kamat MP (ed) Structural optimization: status and promise. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Yoon KP, Hwang C-L (1995) Multiple attribute decision making, an introduction. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar