A computational paradigm for multiresolution topology optimization (MTOP)
This paper presents a multiresolution topology optimization (MTOP) scheme to obtain high resolution designs with relatively low computational cost. We employ three distinct discretization levels for the topology optimization procedure: the displacement mesh (or finite element mesh) to perform the analysis, the design variable mesh to perform the optimization, and the density mesh (or density element mesh) to represent material distribution and compute the stiffness matrices. We employ a coarser discretization for finite elements and finer discretization for both density elements and design variables. A projection scheme is employed to compute the element densities from design variables and control the length scale of the material density. We demonstrate via various two- and three-dimensional numerical examples that the resolution of the design can be significantly improved without refining the finite element mesh.
KeywordsTopology optimization Density mesh Design variable Multiresolution Finite element mesh Projection scheme
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidisc Optim 1(4):193–202Google Scholar
- Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):635–654Google Scholar
- Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 96–100Google Scholar
- de Sturler E, Paulino GH, Wang S (2008) Topology optimization with adaptive mesh refinement. In: Proceeding of the 6th international conference on computational of shell and spatial structures, IASS-IACM, 28–31 May 2008. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Diaz AR, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 10(1):40–45Google Scholar
- Paulino GH, Almeida SRM, Silva ECN (2008) Pattern repetition in topology optimization of functionally graded material. In: Proceedings of the multiscale, multifunctional and functionally graded materials conference, 22–25 September 2008. Sendai, JapanGoogle Scholar
- Paulino GH, Pereira A, Talischi C, Menezes IFM, Celes W (2008) Embedding of superelements for three-dimensional topology optimization. In: Proceedings of Iberian Latin American congress on computational methods in engineering (CILAMCE)Google Scholar
- Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Multidisc Optim 4(3–4):250–252Google Scholar
- Sigmund O, Peterson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Multidisc Optim 16(1):68–75Google Scholar