Advertisement

Pattern optimization of eccentrically loaded multi-fastener joints

  • A. OinonenEmail author
  • P. Tanskanen
  • T. Björk
  • G. Marquis
Industrial Application

Abstract

For structural joints subject to dynamic loading, the fatigue strength is controlled by local stresses. For steel plate structures joined with fasteners, fatigue is governed by local friction and slip near the fasteners. As a working hypothesis for this study, a “weakest link” approach has been adopted. An optimum fastener pattern is attained by reducing the shear load in the most severely loaded fastener in the group. In this study, a typical eccentric multi-fastener bracket-to-beam joint was studied using constrained geometric optimization. Alternate assumptions concerning the distribution of the direct shear force between fasteners in a group were assessed. An analytical expression for non-uniform direct shear force resulted in an optimized fastener pattern with approximately 20% lower von Mises equivalent strain. The comparative finite element method based topology optimization analysis resulted in a contour, which was in close agreement with the fastener pattern attained analytically by exploiting geometry optimization.

Keywords

Fatigue design Multi-fastener joints Structural optimization Topology optimization Geometric optimization 

References

  1. Arnovlević I (1909) Inanspruchnahme der Anschlussnieten elastischer Stäbe. Zeitschrift für Architektur und Ingenieurwesen XIV:89–106Google Scholar
  2. Birkemoe PC, Srinivasan R (1971) Fatigue of bolted high strength structural steel. J Struct Div 97:935–951Google Scholar
  3. Bleich F (1924) Theorie und Berechnung der Eisernen Brücken. Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, 581 ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford SF, Kulak GL (1971) Eccentrically loaded bolted connections. J Struct Div 97:765–783Google Scholar
  5. Davis RE, Woodruff GB, Davis HE (1939) Tension tests of large riveted joints. Am Soc Civ Eng Trans 2084:1193–1299Google Scholar
  6. Galambos TV, Reinhold TA, Ellingwood B (1982) Serviceability limit states: connection slip. J Struct Div 108:2668–2680Google Scholar
  7. Gullander P (1914) Eccentric rivet connections. Eng Rec 70:518Google Scholar
  8. Hansen NG (1959) Fatigue tests of joints of high strength steels. J Struct Div 85:51–69Google Scholar
  9. Higdon A, Ohlsen EH, Stiles WB, Weese JA, Riley WF (1976) Mechanics of materials, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, 756 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Higgins TR (1964) New formulas for fasteners loaded off center. Eng News-Rec 21:102–104Google Scholar
  11. Hobbacher A (2007) Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. International Institute of Welding, IIW document XIII-2151-07/XV-1254-07, Paris, 149 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Kulak GL (1975) Eccentrically loaded slip-resistant connections. Eng J 12:52–55Google Scholar
  13. Kulak GL, Fisher JW, Struik JHA (1987) Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 333 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuzmanović BO, Willems N (1977) Steel design for structural engineers. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 509 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. McCormac JC (1992) Structural steel design: ASD method, 4th edn. HarperCollins Inc., New York, 726 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Michell AGM (1904) The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. Philos Mag 8:589–597Google Scholar
  17. Moisseiff LS, Hartmann EC, Moore RL (1943) Riveted and pin-connected joints of steel and aluminum alloys. Am Soc Civ Eng Trans 2233:1359–1399Google Scholar
  18. Muir LS, Thornton WA (2004) Exploring the true geometry of the inelastic instantaneous center method for eccentrically loaded bolt groups. In: Bijlaard FSK, Gresnigt AM, van der Vegte GJ (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on connections in steel structures V: behaviour, strength & design, Amsterdam, 3–4 June 2004, pp 281–286Google Scholar
  19. Reemsnyder HS (1975) Fatigue life extension of riveted connections. J Struct Div 101:2591–2608Google Scholar
  20. Reilly C (1870) Studies of iron girder bridges, recently executed, illustrating some applications of the modern theory of the elastic resistance of materials. Minutes Proc Inst Civ Eng XXIX:403–500Google Scholar
  21. Rutenberg A (1984) Nonlinear analysis of eccentric bolted connections. Eng J 21:227–236Google Scholar
  22. Salmon CG, Johnson JE (1996) Steel structures: design and behavior, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1024 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. SAS IP Inc. (2004) ANSYS release 9.0 documentation: chapter 20. Design optimization & advanced analysis techniques guide: chapter 2. Topological optimizationGoogle Scholar
  24. SFS-ENV 1993-1-3 Eurocode 3: design of steel structures. Part 1–3. General rules, supplementary rules for cold formed thin gauge members and sheeting. Finnish Standards Association, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  25. Shermer CL (1971) Plastic behavior of eccentrically-loaded connections. Eng J 8:48–51Google Scholar
  26. Surtees JO, Pape ED (1979) Bolt force distribution in friction grip eccentric shear joints. Proc Inst Civ Eng 67:801–816Google Scholar
  27. Surtees JO, Gildersleeve CP, Watts CJ (1981) A general tabular method for elastic and plastic analysis of eccentrically loaded fastener groups. Struct Eng 59A:202–208Google Scholar
  28. Swift T (1984) Fracture analysis of stiffened structure. In: Chang JB, Rudd JL (eds) Damage tolerance of metallic structures: analysis methods and applications. ASTM STP 842, Ann Arbor, pp 69–107Google Scholar
  29. Tanskanen P (2002) The evolutionary structural optimization method: theoretical aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:5485–5498zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. The MathWorks (2008) Optimization toolbox: constrained optimization: sequential quadratic programming (SQP). Accessed 6 Oct 2008. Available via http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/toolbox/optim/index.html
  31. Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Oinonen
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Tanskanen
    • 1
  • T. Björk
    • 1
  • G. Marquis
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Fatigue and StrengthLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.Department of Applied MechanicsHelsinki University of TechnologyHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations