Pareto frontier for simultaneous structural and manufacturing optimization of a composite part

  • H. Ghiasi
  • D. Pasini
  • L. Lessard


Optimized design of composite structures requires simultaneous optimization of structural performance and manufacturing process. Such a challenge calls for a multi-objective optimization. Here, a generating multi-objective optimization method called normalized normal constraint method, which attains a set of optimal solutions and allows the designer to explore design alternatives before making the final decision, is coupled with a local-global search called constrained globalized bounded Nelder–Mead method. The proposed approach is applied to the design of a Z-shaped composite bracket for optimization of structural and manufacturing objectives. Comparison of the results with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) shows that when only a small number of function evaluations are possible and a few Pareto optima are desired, the proposed method outperforms NSGA-II in terms of convergence to the true Pareto frontier. The results are validated by an enumeration search and by exploring the neighbourhood of the final solutions.


Multi-objective optimization Composite materials Pareto frontier Global optimization Simultaneous optimization 


  1. Abouhamze M, Shakeri M (2007) Multi-objective stacking sequence optimization of laminated cylindrical panels using a genetic algorithm and neural networks. Compos Struct 81(2):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adali S (1983) Multiobjective design of an antisymmetric angle-ply laminate by non-linear programming. ASME J Mech Transm Autom Des 105:214–219Google Scholar
  3. Adali S, Walker M, Verijenko VE (1996) Multiobjective optimization of laminated plates for maximum prebuckling, buckling and postbuckling strength using continuous and discrete ply angles. Compos Struct 35:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costin DP, Wang BP (1993) Optimum design of a composite structure with manufacturing constrains. Thin-walled Struct 17:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deka DJ, Sandeep G, Chakraborty D, Dutta A (2005) Multiobjective optimization of laminated composites using finite element method and genetic algorithm. J Reinf Plast Compos 24(3):273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghiasi H, Pasini D, Lessard L (2008) Constrained globalized Nelder-Mead method for simultaneous structural and manufacturing optimization of a composite bracket. J Compos Mater 42(7):717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson JL, Gurdal Z, Loos AC (1999) Combined structural and manufacturing optimization of stiffened composite panels. J Aircr 36(1):246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphrey DG, Wilson JR (2000) A revised simplex search procedure for stochastic simulation response surface optimization. INFORMS J Comput 12(4):272–283CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Kere P, Koski J (2002) Multicriterion optimization of composite laminates for maximum failure margins with an interactive descent algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 23:436–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kere P, Lento J (2005) Design optimization of laminated composite structures using distributed grid resources. Compos Struct 71(3–4):435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kere P, Lyly M, Koski J (2003) Using multicriterion optimization for strength design of composite laminates. Compos Struct 62:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE (1998) Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim 9(1):112–147zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Riche R, Saouab A, Breard J (2003) Coupled compression RTM and composite lay up optimization. Comput Sci Tech 63(1):2277–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luersen MA, Le Riche R (2004) Globalized Nelder–Mead method for engineering optimization. Comput Struct 82:2251–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manne PM, Tsai SW (1998) Design optimization of composite plates: part II—structural optimization by ply drop targeting. J Compos Mater 32(6):572–598Google Scholar
  18. Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multiobjective optimization methods. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:369–395CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Megson THG (1999) Aircraft structures for engineering students, 3rd edn. Arrowsmith, BristolGoogle Scholar
  20. Messac A, Ismail-Yahaya A, Mattson CA (2003) The normalized normal constraint, method for generating the Pareto frontier. Struct Multidisc Optim 25(2):86–98CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohan Rao AR, Arvind N (2005) A scatter search algorithm for stacking sequence optimisation of laminate composites. Compos Struct 70:383–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) Simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Omkar SN, Mudigere D, Naik GN, Gopalakrishnan S (2008) Vector evaluated particle swarm optimization (VEPSO) for multi-objective design optimization of composite structures. Comput Struct 86:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pagano NJ, Pipes RB (1989) Interlaminar response of composite materials. In: Pagano NJ (ed) Composite materials series, vol 5. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Pareto V (1906) Manuale di economica politica, Societa Editrice Libraria, Milan (translated into English by AS Schwier as Manual of Political Economy, edited by AS Schwier and AN 1971). AM Kelley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Park CH, Lee WI, Kim SJ, Han WS, Vautrin A (2001) Simultaneous optimization of design and manufacture of composite structures. Collect Tech Paper Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf 1:186–196Google Scholar
  28. Park CH, Lee W, Han WS, Vautrin A (2003) Weight minimization of composite laminated plates with multiple constraints. Compos Sci Technol 63(7):1015–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Park CH, Lee W, Han WS, Vautrin A (2004) Simultaneous optimization of composite structures considering mechanical performance and manufacturing cost. Compos Struct 65(1):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park CH, Lee W, Han WS, Vautrin A (2005) Multiconstraint optimization of composite structures manufactured by resin transfer molding process. J Compos Mater 39(4):347–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pelletier JL, Vel SS (2006) Multi-objective optimization of fiber reinforced composite laminates for strength, stiffness and minimal mass. Comput Struct 84:2065–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saravanos DA, Chamis CC (1992) Multiobjective shape and material optimization of composite structures including damping. AIAA 30(3):805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Srinivas N, Deb K (1995) Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2(3):221–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suresh S, Sujit PB, Rao AK (2007) Particle swarm optimization approach for multi-objective composite box-beam design. Compos Struct 81(4):598–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsai SW (1992) Theory of composites design, think composites. Division of ILT Corporation, DaytonGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker M, Smith R (2003) A technique for the multiobjective optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and finite element analysis. Compos Struct 62(1):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker M, Reiss T, Adali S (1997) Multiobjective design of laminated cylindrical shells for maximum torsional and axial buckling loads. Comput Struct 62(2):237–242zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang BP, Costin DP (1992) Optimum design of a composite structure with three types of manufacturing constraints. AIAA J 30(6):1667–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang K, Kelly D, Dutton S (2002) Multi-objective optimisation of composite aerospace structures. Compos Struct 57(1):141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watkins RI, Morris A (1987) A multi-criteria objective function optimization scheme for laminated composites for use in multilevel structural optimization schemes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 60:233–251zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations